Just like the day before (2 x 15m at 2:18 split) I considered this as a steady state plus session and I also allowed my heart rate to go a bit higher than usual because I wasn't completely recovered from a little illness yet.
I ended up with a pace of 2:17 and an avergage heart rate ranging between 140 and 148.
So I was probably doing most of this session in AT zone. Had I been 100% fit, I might have wanted to spend a larger portion in UT1, but given the circumstances this was okay.
* Week 17 Day 2 [8 x 500m]
I saved the hardest session of the week for the last, since I wanted to be as much recovered from my fever as possible.
This is probably also my weakest distance, since I simply lack power for these short distances, and I'm not particularly quick neither, so I can't compensate it that way.
Last 8 x 500m session was back in week 11, so already a long time ago. Back than I paced it at 1:59 + last rep at 1:56.
So normally it should be easy to go faster this time.
However, when I looked back in my history I could only find 7 reps, so I probably did one too few last time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1138d/1138dcf9a78666989a0df06047e3a93ca77d9a8b" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Also, I was probably still recovering a bit from a flu and was doing two sessions in high UT1/AT zone over the past two days.
So all in all I was a bit uncertain on how to pace this session, so I ended up using my general rule of thumb when in doubt: going one second faster than last time.
As targeted I did the session at 1:58 + last rep at 1:54.
Despite being it a relatively limited improvement, I was very satisfied with the result, especially since I felt that I had some left in the tank in the end.
Up to week 18, which counts about 40k in total and a scary looking 4 x 2k on Day 2!
Indeed, but unlike you I usually approach these sessions as steady state (plus) sessions rather than interval sessions. One of the reasons may also be that since I started the BPP plan, I have been averaging about five sports sessions a week (rowing and indoor soccer combined), which I've never done before in my life. And since indoor soccer is already leaning more towards interval training, I feel that I would otherwise be doing a bit too much interval and not enough steady state/recovery.Nomark wrote: ↑February 26th, 2025, 6:40 amWe have had this discussion before about the long intervals falling between two stools of too short or too slow. I have decided to go more aggressive on these and treat them like interval sessions if I am well rested and try and beat my previous time. To be honest 3x10m is not far off 3x2k so I do then the same now. They are not full intensity like the shorter pieces yet, but they should get there soon as the average time target is still quite generous and it's hard to know how hard I can actually do them, so I just chip away at the times month by month.
For this reason, I also started to occasionally skip the Day 5 session when the distance of that session is too short to do it as a steady state plus session.
Since professionals often train in zone 2 (or at least that's what I've read), I assume it is not a waste to do so.Nomark wrote: ↑February 26th, 2025, 6:40 amSpeaking of pacing, I did consider doing an "active recovery" piece yesterday. My legs still ached a little from i3 days in a row totalling over 25k at a decent clip. I imagined Olympians probably feel like this a lot and can't just have a day off, so what if I did 5-8k at 2:30-2:40? Would that be worth doing? I decided to listen to my body and have a break, but I'm curious on the science and whether it's miles in the legs or just a waste of time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4faf3/4faf3cff138b7984bd1a0950d3138e560d1e0594" alt="Wink :wink:"
But I also read that taking a rest day at least once a week is necessary too.