Hi!
I'm a graduate student at the University of Georgia and I am conducting a research project on the effects that height, weight, shoe size, and age have on rowing performance. I have created this questionnaire to collect data. I need 50 observations at a minimum so will appreciate any responses provided! Thank you in advance.
https://forms.gle/spLi9xWNT13sqRFc8
Data collection
-
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10732
- Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
- Location: Liverpool, England
Re: Data collection
Done
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman
Re: Data collection
Me too...
One observation - it asks for 500 and 2k PRs - easy enough to enter. But in my case I did them 13 years ago so can't really correlate vs age.
One observation - it asks for 500 and 2k PRs - easy enough to enter. But in my case I did them 13 years ago so can't really correlate vs age.
Mike - 67 HWT 183
Re: Data collection
Done.
Had I filled this form a year ago, the results would deviate much
Had I filled this form a year ago, the results would deviate much
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
Re: Data collection
Done
Another observation, is you ask for shoe size, but you don't specify which sizing system. I am size 10 (UK), 11 (US) or 45 (EU), and I believe there are further systems for Japan and Australia and probably others.
Another observation, is you ask for shoe size, but you don't specify which sizing system. I am size 10 (UK), 11 (US) or 45 (EU), and I believe there are further systems for Japan and Australia and probably others.
Male 54 - 74.4kg 188cm - Restarted rowing Feb. 2023 (after a 30 year break!)
Re: Data collection
Because of this I added "Eur" to my number, observed the same.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
Re: Data collection
Isn't it missing a very important metric of training volume?
I mean with respect, you will find that typically the bigger/heavier a person is, the generally larger shoe size. Numerous studies have already proved that long leavers generally equate to good erg performances. (with a lot of the assumptions ruled out scientifically)
But by not including the training volume a person does (with a bias towards exercise that benefits rowing) you're not actually able to compare apples to apples imo.
A 7' monster who sits on the couch all day who's never sat on an erg will very likely give much poorer and lower figures than some-one 5' who trains appropriately every day. And the focus on 500m & 2k as performance markers will trend towards the bigger/stronger athlete vs the more aerobically fit who can manage 5k and upwards better.
Apologies, a bit of a tangent to the request, but part of my job falls into meaningful dataset analysis; and one of the things that is always important to avoid is falling into a bias confirmation trap. Also avoid datasets that don't provide specific enough datapoints to draw conclusions that aren't general ones.
I mean with respect, you will find that typically the bigger/heavier a person is, the generally larger shoe size. Numerous studies have already proved that long leavers generally equate to good erg performances. (with a lot of the assumptions ruled out scientifically)
But by not including the training volume a person does (with a bias towards exercise that benefits rowing) you're not actually able to compare apples to apples imo.
A 7' monster who sits on the couch all day who's never sat on an erg will very likely give much poorer and lower figures than some-one 5' who trains appropriately every day. And the focus on 500m & 2k as performance markers will trend towards the bigger/stronger athlete vs the more aerobically fit who can manage 5k and upwards better.
Apologies, a bit of a tangent to the request, but part of my job falls into meaningful dataset analysis; and one of the things that is always important to avoid is falling into a bias confirmation trap. Also avoid datasets that don't provide specific enough datapoints to draw conclusions that aren't general ones.
M 6'4 born:'82
PB's
'23: HM=1:36:08.0, 60'=13,702m
'24: 500m=1:37.7, 2k=7:44.80, 5k=20:42.9, 10k=42:13.1, FM=3:18:35.4, 30'=7,132m
'25: 6k: 25:05.4
Logbook
PB's
'23: HM=1:36:08.0, 60'=13,702m
'24: 500m=1:37.7, 2k=7:44.80, 5k=20:42.9, 10k=42:13.1, FM=3:18:35.4, 30'=7,132m
'25: 6k: 25:05.4
Logbook