Data collection

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
Post Reply
brookeansley
Paddler
Posts: 1
Joined: April 11th, 2024, 10:34 am

Data collection

Post by brookeansley » April 11th, 2024, 10:44 am

Hi!

I'm a graduate student at the University of Georgia and I am conducting a research project on the effects that height, weight, shoe size, and age have on rowing performance. I have created this questionnaire to collect data. I need 50 observations at a minimum so will appreciate any responses provided! Thank you in advance.

https://forms.gle/spLi9xWNT13sqRFc8

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10430
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Data collection

Post by Dangerscouse » April 11th, 2024, 2:54 pm

Done
50 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

MPx
10k Poster
Posts: 1251
Joined: October 30th, 2016, 1:38 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Data collection

Post by MPx » April 11th, 2024, 2:59 pm

Me too...

One observation - it asks for 500 and 2k PRs - easy enough to enter. But in my case I did them 13 years ago so can't really correlate vs age.
Mike - 67 HWT 183

Image

Sakly
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3255
Joined: January 13th, 2022, 10:49 am

Re: Data collection

Post by Sakly » April 11th, 2024, 4:04 pm

Done.
Had I filled this form a year ago, the results would deviate much 😄
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:27.1
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log

rleeden
Paddler
Posts: 13
Joined: July 4th, 2023, 6:17 am

Re: Data collection

Post by rleeden » April 12th, 2024, 2:21 am

Done

Another observation, is you ask for shoe size, but you don't specify which sizing system. I am size 10 (UK), 11 (US) or 45 (EU), and I believe there are further systems for Japan and Australia and probably others.
Male 54 - 74.4kg 188cm - Restarted rowing Feb. 2023 (after a 30 year break!)

Sakly
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3255
Joined: January 13th, 2022, 10:49 am

Re: Data collection

Post by Sakly » April 12th, 2024, 2:38 am

rleeden wrote:
April 12th, 2024, 2:21 am
Done

Another observation, is you ask for shoe size, but you don't specify which sizing system. I am size 10 (UK), 11 (US) or 45 (EU), and I believe there are further systems for Japan and Australia and probably others.
Because of this I added "Eur" to my number, observed the same.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:27.1
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log

p_b82
5k Poster
Posts: 543
Joined: August 8th, 2022, 1:24 pm
Location: South Somerset, UK

Re: Data collection

Post by p_b82 » April 12th, 2024, 5:05 am

Isn't it missing a very important metric of training volume?

I mean with respect, you will find that typically the bigger/heavier a person is, the generally larger shoe size. Numerous studies have already proved that long leavers generally equate to good erg performances. (with a lot of the assumptions ruled out scientifically)

But by not including the training volume a person does (with a bias towards exercise that benefits rowing) you're not actually able to compare apples to apples imo.
A 7' monster who sits on the couch all day who's never sat on an erg will very likely give much poorer and lower figures than some-one 5' who trains appropriately every day. And the focus on 500m & 2k as performance markers will trend towards the bigger/stronger athlete vs the more aerobically fit who can manage 5k and upwards better.

Apologies, a bit of a tangent to the request, but part of my job falls into meaningful dataset analysis; and one of the things that is always important to avoid is falling into a bias confirmation trap. Also avoid datasets that don't provide specific enough datapoints to draw conclusions that aren't general ones.
M 6'4 born:'82
PB's
'23: 6k=25:23.5, HM=1:36:08.0, 60'=13,702m
'24: 500m=1:37.7, 2k=7:44.80, 5k=20:42.9, 10k=42:13.1, FM=3:18:35.4, 30'=7,132m
Logbook

Post Reply