Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Roy--
Rowing is a technical challenge.
To be a great lightweight, you need to have a natural, sustainable stroke that pulls an easy 13 SPI.
Can you figure it out?
Leadville says that it's quick and easy to figure out, if you have the right coach.
Do you have the right coach?
ranger
Rowing is a technical challenge.
To be a great lightweight, you need to have a natural, sustainable stroke that pulls an easy 13 SPI.
Can you figure it out?
Leadville says that it's quick and easy to figure out, if you have the right coach.
Do you have the right coach?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Rocket Roy
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 338
- Joined: October 16th, 2006, 3:59 pm
- Location: London
Re: Ranger's training thread
Why are you obsessed with the FM?
Why not make it 100k, sounds more impressive no?
Why not make it 100k, sounds more impressive no?
Lwt 55+ World Record Holder 6.38.1 (2006-2018)
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
Are you talking about rowing or erging? You don't know much about the requirements of racing when it comes to rowing. How many OTW events have you completed?ranger wrote:Rowing is a technical challenge.
To be a great lightweight, you need to have a natural, sustainable stroke that pulls an easy 13 SPI.
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
I do, just like the nutty pro, roy is a few years older, so 6.40 will be out of his reach, 6.50 would be great at his age.snowleopard wrote:Sure, free rate. Can't see that being a problem.ranger wrote:So, at that HR and rest period, Roy will want to bring that 5 x 1K @ 1:47 down to 1:40 over the next six months in order to be ready for a 6:40 2K.snowleopard wrote:Roy Brook's scores for a recent 5 x 1K @ 24
Re: Ranger's training thread
Henry, Roy, Snow', Byron, Paul, et al....
Isn't it time to merely congratulate the old scrawny man on his "rowing well" and acknowledge the impasse with his ever bothering to complete anything truly outstanding anymore? Wouldn't that be appropriate attention? He has no taste for achievement or competition. All he wants is to post,post,post: dreams of what he'll never do. We see this quite frequently in old guys who drink too much...
If we just say "great work" and "atta boy" and stuff in that vein, he'll know we appreciate him for what he really is...
an attention hog.
It would be a nice change to resist engaging in overly repetitious jabs at a fake.
Sure he rows all his strokes at 13 spi!
Sure a FM at 1:45 pace is just around the corner!
In cyberspace anything is possible.
None of us really expect to see him row in the flesh nor will we ever get the chance.
Let's support the fantasy as it's the only thing he has left to hold on to....
Hail ranger, GTSSB !
*greatest thing since sliced bread
Isn't it time to merely congratulate the old scrawny man on his "rowing well" and acknowledge the impasse with his ever bothering to complete anything truly outstanding anymore? Wouldn't that be appropriate attention? He has no taste for achievement or competition. All he wants is to post,post,post: dreams of what he'll never do. We see this quite frequently in old guys who drink too much...
If we just say "great work" and "atta boy" and stuff in that vein, he'll know we appreciate him for what he really is...
an attention hog.
It would be a nice change to resist engaging in overly repetitious jabs at a fake.
Sure he rows all his strokes at 13 spi!
Sure a FM at 1:45 pace is just around the corner!
In cyberspace anything is possible.
None of us really expect to see him row in the flesh nor will we ever get the chance.
Let's support the fantasy as it's the only thing he has left to hold on to....
Hail ranger, GTSSB !
*greatest thing since sliced bread
Re: Ranger's training thread
The distance enforces the HR limitation.Rocket Roy wrote:Why are you obsessed with the FM?
You can't do a FM at much over 75% HRR, which is pretty near UT2.
No need to race a FM, really.
You can also just test your UT2 pace for 90min.
But that's quite a bit more complicated and questionable, given the HR data needed--maxHR, restingHR, %HRR, etc.
No HR monitoring and calculations are needed to get a good 2K prediction from a FM trial.
It's a race.
Just row 42K as fast as you can.
See what you get.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
What do you do for 5K OTW?leadville wrote:Sculling is Not so complicated that it takes seven plus years to get it right.
How many times have you won the Head of the Charles?
If you haven't won, what has been your highest finish?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I have three WR rows OTErg. But none of them were done "rowing well."mikvan52 wrote:Isn't it time to merely congratulate the old scrawny man on his "rowing well" and acknowledge the impasse with his ever bothering to complete anything truly outstanding anymore? Wouldn't that be appropriate attention? He has no taste for achievement or competition.
They were done at max drag, rowing _very_ badly--short sliding, diving at the catch, hauling anchor with my upper body, dragging my legs behind, both catching and finishing with my back.
I didn't know how to row.
Achievement?
I don't consider something an achievement if I have already done it--repeatedly.
So, I don't have any interest in piling up another list of WR 2Ks, rowing badly at max drag.
My interest in doing a 2K, rowing well (13 SPI) at low drag (120 df.), fully prepared, is exactly an interest in achievement, doing something that is _better_ than what I have done before.
For me personally, I think that rowing well (13 SPI) at low drag (120 df.), vis-a-vis rowing badly (10 SPI) at max drag (200+ df.), will be worth seven seconds per 500m in a 2K OTErg.
Relative to what I could do OTErg ten years ago as a total novice not knowing how to row, over 2K, this seven seconds per 500m will give me three seconds per 500m in pace above and beyond the standard decline with age among veterans of four seconds per 500m a decade.
6:28 ten years ago will now be 6:16.
In terms of wattage, three seconds per 500m in a 2K is the equivalent of six seconds per 500m in a FM.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on August 15th, 2011, 8:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
That's a fantastic achievement.ranger wrote: I have three WR rows OTErg. But none of them were done "rowing well."
They were done at max drag, rowing _very_ badly--short sliding, diving at the catch, hauling anchor with my upper body, dragging my legs behind, both catching and finishing with my back.
Well done.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Re: Ranger's training thread
Sure.KevJGK wrote:That's a fantastic achievement.ranger wrote: I have three WR rows OTErg. But none of them were done "rowing well."
They were done at max drag, rowing _very_ badly--short sliding, diving at the catch, hauling anchor with my upper body, dragging my legs behind, both catching and finishing with my back.
Well done.
But once it is done, it can no longer be an achievement to do it again.
The achievement was a matter of race preparation and fitness.
It had nothing to do with rowing well (technique).
Pace in rowing is always a _combined_ product of (1) the quality of your fitness and (2) the quality of your technique.
So, in spite of the achievement with fitness, since 2002, I have still had quite a bit of potential still to tap, if I could improve my technique.
I have now done that.
In my estimation, fitness and technique are about equally responsible for 2K scores.
Compared to a rower who is unfit and unable, at the same rate, a rower who is fit and able goes along at a pace that is about 20 seconds per 500m faster.
Half of that margin is due to fitness.
And half is due to technique.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
ranger wrote:The distance enforces the HR limitation.Rocket Roy wrote:Why are you obsessed with the FM?
You can't do a FM at much over 75% HRR, which is pretty near UT2.
ranger
Tell these guys then
Eddie Fletcher recorded these HR's during these Marathon rows
Anna Bailey (50-59 hwt) 2:53 86% HRR (WR)
Anne Yates (50-59 lwt) 3:10 84% HRR (WR)
Alex Brown (50-59 hwt) 2:41 85% HRR (British Record)
Mark Whyman (40-49 hwt) 2:37 84% HRR (PB)
Last edited by mrfit on August 15th, 2011, 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Why do novices do so well on the erg? Super fitness? Why do more experienced rowers lose this super fitness?ranger wrote:
In my estimation, fitness and technique are about equally responsible for 2K scores.
ranger
Re: Ranger's training thread
Ranger- When do you sleep? Posts at 1:30am until 4:45am? Then more starting at 7am. I assume you were doing your 20k on the erg between 5 and 7am.
1968 78kg 186cm
Re: Ranger's training thread
Brilliant assessment, Rich.ranger wrote:Sure.KevJGK wrote:That's a fantastic achievement.ranger wrote: I have three WR rows OTErg. But none of them were done "rowing well."
They were done at max drag, rowing _very_ badly--short sliding, diving at the catch, hauling anchor with my upper body, dragging my legs behind, both catching and finishing with my back.
Well done.
But once it is done, it can no longer be an achievement to do it again.
The achievement was a matter of race preparation and fitness.
It had nothing to do with rowing well (technique).
Pace in rowing is always a _combined_ product of (1) the quality of your fitness and (2) the quality of your technique.
So, in spite of the achievement with fitness, since 2002, I have still had quite a bit of potential still to tap, if I could improve my technique.
I have now done that.
In my estimation, fitness and technique are about equally responsible for 2K scores.
Compared to a rower who is unfit and unable, at the same rate, a rower who is fit and able goes along at a pace that is about 20 seconds per 500m faster.
Half of that margin is due to fitness.
And half is due to technique.
ranger
Glad you shared this.
Can it ever be overemphasized that pace is due to fitness & technique?
Leave it to you to keep our eyes on the prize!
Last edited by mikvan52 on August 15th, 2011, 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Remember, he only takes good strokes, all at 13 SPI, and examines his technique as he goes along. This makes for plenty of stopping and starting, so why not get in a post or two, or edit an existing one? Helps enforce the HR limitation, you knownharrigan wrote:Ranger- When do you sleep? Posts at 1:30am until 4:45am? Then more starting at 7am. I assume you were doing your 20k on the erg between 5 and 7am.
it also allows us to receive his pearls of wisdom as soon as possible, which I'm sure you will agree is something very valuable to all of us. Thrilling to get the dispatches from the front lines describing his advances into unexplored territory, rowing better than any old man his age and weight has ever done on a piece of gym equipment! His mommy and daddy must be just bursting with pride!