Display for avg/500m
Display for avg/500m
Hello! I am very confused on the timing of the display. I have been doing the row for a few years now but I wanted to train to go faster. I found multiple YT videos for sub 7, which is what I want but when following along I realized, even with the same pace and pulling with back my AVE shows like 30s more than others. Below is what I normally do, then below that is what I tried to follow, but mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?
Avg 35s/m
2000m
Avg time 8:33
2:06 AVE/500m
Drag factor avg 137
Below is one of the links I was following in pace.
30s/m
2000m
Time 6:58
1:45 AVE/500M
https://youtu.be/H6ob3xQYhhM?si=-6BBHvTG_VBWHQIh
Avg 35s/m
2000m
Avg time 8:33
2:06 AVE/500m
Drag factor avg 137
Below is one of the links I was following in pace.
30s/m
2000m
Time 6:58
1:45 AVE/500M
https://youtu.be/H6ob3xQYhhM?si=-6BBHvTG_VBWHQIh
Re: Display for avg/500m
There are two ways to increase your pace: (1) pull harder; (2) increase your stroke rate.
Your stroke rate is plenty high, so I suggest you pull harder.
If your pull is speed limited you can try higher df; otherwise maybe even lower df. Lower df gives you faster drive which is fine so long as you pull just as hard.
If you play with the PM5 you can make it display your force curve. I don't usually but you might find it useful.
Your stroke rate is plenty high, so I suggest you pull harder.
If your pull is speed limited you can try higher df; otherwise maybe even lower df. Lower df gives you faster drive which is fine so long as you pull just as hard.
If you play with the PM5 you can make it display your force curve. I don't usually but you might find it useful.
Re: Display for avg/500m
You need to understand that the power that goes into the machine is not entirely depending on the strokes per minute and the length/form of the stroke. So if two persons pull at the same rate with the same stroke length, their pace can easily differ by 30s/500 or even more.
The pace is mainly depending on the strokes length and the acceleration during the drive. Pushing harder at the same rate with the same length gives you more acceleration (shorter drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes at the same acceleration (longer drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes with more acceleration = much faster pace. All at the same rate.
The pace is mainly depending on the strokes length and the acceleration during the drive. Pushing harder at the same rate with the same length gives you more acceleration (shorter drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes at the same acceleration (longer drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes with more acceleration = much faster pace. All at the same rate.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 304
- Joined: September 16th, 2023, 8:07 am
- Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: Display for avg/500m
Rowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously
Re: Display for avg/500m
Unless the group agrees on a certain pace, then you can also have the same distance. That is what we do with the saturday group rows on EXR: several people have agreed to always row the same pace durng that session, allowing groups to form around them. We start all at the same time, the groups form naturally, and the pace groups finish together.hikeplusrow wrote: ↑August 13th, 2024, 8:39 amRowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously
Re: Display for avg/500m
Most people cannot maintain a strong stroke at 35 strokes per minute for 2k. Remember that the "boat" keeps moving between strokes and so you want to produce strong strokes so that it is travelling fast. Then we go up the slide at a controlled pace to give your muscles time to recover sufficiently to repeat the strong stroke to accelerate the "boat" again. You are using quite a high DF. You might like to try lowering this to see if this allows you to get a smoother faster drive. It is common at the gym to see people at 35+ SpM pulling paces that would take>10min for a 2k and usually stopping exhausted after 500m or so, so your performance is better than most.
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 304
- Joined: September 16th, 2023, 8:07 am
- Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: Display for avg/500m
Good idea. I hadn't thought of that.JaapvanE wrote: ↑August 13th, 2024, 9:17 amUnless the group agrees on a certain pace, then you can also have the same distance. That is what we do with the saturday group rows on EXR: several people have agreed to always row the same pace durng that session, allowing groups to form around them. We start all at the same time, the groups form naturally, and the pace groups finish together.hikeplusrow wrote: ↑August 13th, 2024, 8:39 amRowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously
Re: Display for avg/500m
It's pretty possible with a quick recovery back up the slide to pull lightly with a slowish drive and have a high s/m with a slowish average pace. With good technique you pull hard and fast and have a quick drive, and then recover back up the slide slowly.Fox97 wrote: ↑August 13th, 2024, 6:41 amHello! I am very confused on the timing of the display. I have been doing the row for a few years now but I wanted to train to go faster. I found multiple YT videos for sub 7, which is what I want but when following along I realized, even with the same pace and pulling with back my AVE shows like 30s more than others. Below is what I normally do, then below that is what I tried to follow, but mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?
Avg 35s/m
2000m
Avg time 8:33
2:06 AVE/500m
Drag factor avg 137
Below is one of the links I was following in pace.
30s/m
2000m
Time 6:58
1:45 AVE/500M
https://youtu.be/H6ob3xQYhhM?si=-6BBHvTG_VBWHQIh
That said. My first attempt at a 2k was exactly the same as yours (8min 33sec) as you can see in my signature. If you are extremely light and short like myself(60kg/173cm) it's not that bad a time at all for a first shot I don't think, however if you are a fair bit heavier and taller than me then you need to pull a bit harder as you should be beating a flyweight like me.
Once you pull a bit harder your s/m will inevitably come down to mid/high twenties I imagine but that's not a bad thing and gives room for improvement with more fitness.
Age 52....Weight 61 Kg....
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]
Re: Display for avg/500m
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
Re: Display for avg/500m
I think this is a distinction without a difference. If you want to lift a piano, you push with your legs, arguably more than you pull with your arms. But you're still lifting. Same with rowing. Thinking about what muscles you are using is a distraction. You want to yank the handle back as hard as you can as far as you can, without losing your balance at the end.
Re: Display for avg/500m
No it's not broke.mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?
The machine is for training. We train by doing what we can. But not too much.
Rowing is a very difficult sport, it won't come immediately, so keep trying.
The machine measures a thing called Work; but some of us can do more work than others, depending on how big, how old and what sex we are.
In any case your 2:06 pace is 175Watt, so you're certainly not just idling along, like I do at 120W.
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.
Re: Display for avg/500m
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but lowering the drag factor a bit 'might' help to get a good drive speed dependent on how big and powerful you are. Certainly helps skinny me to be at a df of around 110 instead of 140.
Age 52....Weight 61 Kg....
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 245
- Joined: February 14th, 2020, 10:05 pm
Re: Display for avg/500m
I’ll second the 110 DF for this LW as well. To each his own…
65 5’-11” 72.5 kg
Re: Display for avg/500m
No lightweight here (neither a big heavyweight ), using ca. 140 for 2ks. But on my steadies on low rates I like to reduce drag to 100+- a few points.Joebasscat wrote: ↑August 14th, 2024, 5:46 amI’ll second the 110 DF for this LW as well. To each his own…
On higher rates the more aggressive slow down of the flywheel is ok, as you pick up again earlier compared to a low rate steady.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log