bloomp wrote:And compared to my Hudson, your Fluid is a piece of garbage. Also, if you somehow became ME (Paul Bloom) you might gain 5s/500m OTW, but no boat will make you that much faster.
Sure, because of your age, weight, and skill.
But, hey.
The numbers are interesting.
For instance, if Mike VB can do 1:48 for 5K on the erg, the best he could do for 5K OTW is 2:00 pace, 20:00, or 19:20 for 3 miles at the Head of the Charles.
For lightweights, 12 seconds per 500m is pretty much a limit on the gap between a 5K on the erg and a 5K on the water.
But what if I do 1:39 for 5K on the erg--at 60 years old?
Hmm.
This would mean that my limit OTW for 5K would be 1:51 pace, if my weight were minimal and skills maximal.
That's 18:30 for 5K, 17:50 for 3 miles.
That's encouraging, no?
2:00 pace is pretty much the best that any 60s/Veteran rower has ever done the Head of the Charles.
Sure, I still have a lot to learn and lot of work to do OTW.
But when all is said and done, I think I will rate 30-32 spm OTW over 5K.
Mike VB's preference is something closer to 25 spm.
And he is not alone in this.
Because of lifelong neglect, and therefore loss of aerobic capacity, veteran (i.e., 60s) OTW rowers can't both row well and get the rate up.
If they try, they run out of air.
Their major limitation is not technical.
Theeir major limitation is physical/physiological.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)