Master's Open Sprint Championship
Master's Open Sprint Championship
I don't know when I will start what I am about to announce, but I am going to host a Master's Open Sprint Championship. It will consist of distances ranging between 250 meters and 1000 meters. It will be based on total time over the series of races. Recently, I learned that some California racing venues have 1000 meter race categories. I am very excited about this in that I am more prepared at the moment for a 1000 meter race than a 2000 meter race.
I am think perhaps in April to give everyone some time to prepare.
I am think perhaps in April to give everyone some time to prepare.
Is this going to be an online event using rowpro?
The very best race I have seen online, and maybe heard about (although I think there have been some other great races) was the 1000m race now 2 years ago during the fall racing series. There was 8 of us in the race all at similar times, right down to the wire.
the new version of RP has the ability to race up to 16 boats, and Pete says he will turn that on at some point once all the bugs are worked out. If you are planning your event online, that would be a great feature to have ready.
The very best race I have seen online, and maybe heard about (although I think there have been some other great races) was the 1000m race now 2 years ago during the fall racing series. There was 8 of us in the race all at similar times, right down to the wire.
the new version of RP has the ability to race up to 16 boats, and Pete says he will turn that on at some point once all the bugs are worked out. If you are planning your event online, that would be a great feature to have ready.
M 51 5'9'' (1.75m), a once and future lightweight
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
- Rockin Roland
- 5k Poster
- Posts: 570
- Joined: March 19th, 2006, 12:02 am
- Location: Moving Flywheel
Thomas,
1000m is the standard distance that all masters race over on the water hence it would be the appropriate distance to race online on the erg. I'm keen to join in if it fits in with my time zone here in OZ.
Wasn't it around April when the World Online Indoor Rowing Champs use to be held? We haven't had one of those for a while. No handicapping nonsense. Just pit age group against age group. In fact we haven't had an online championship event on Rowpro yet. They were previously all on e-row software.
1000m is the standard distance that all masters race over on the water hence it would be the appropriate distance to race online on the erg. I'm keen to join in if it fits in with my time zone here in OZ.
Wasn't it around April when the World Online Indoor Rowing Champs use to be held? We haven't had one of those for a while. No handicapping nonsense. Just pit age group against age group. In fact we haven't had an online championship event on Rowpro yet. They were previously all on e-row software.
PBs: 2K 6:13.4, 5K 16:32, 6K 19:55, 10K 33:49, 30min 8849m, 60min 17,309m
Caution: Static C2 ergs can ruin your technique and timing for rowing in a boat.
The best thing I ever did to improve my rowing was to sell my C2 and get a Rowperfect.
Caution: Static C2 ergs can ruin your technique and timing for rowing in a boat.
The best thing I ever did to improve my rowing was to sell my C2 and get a Rowperfect.
Roland,
Thanks for replying to this. Good to hear from you.
Yes, that is what I want to do. An "OPEN" championship based on raw time. An idea would be somethiing like a 1000 meter piece done each weekend in the month of March with the total time being used as the winners time. So, if you are a dominate rower, then it will reflect and you will be awarded as such.
I have more ideas on this and what is driving me this direction. I will share more later.
I have not heard from Marilyn or Joachim in quite along time. Having met Joachim at Paul's house and again with Marilyn in Munich, they are really good hearted.
Later,
Thomas
Thanks for replying to this. Good to hear from you.
Yes, that is what I want to do. An "OPEN" championship based on raw time. An idea would be somethiing like a 1000 meter piece done each weekend in the month of March with the total time being used as the winners time. So, if you are a dominate rower, then it will reflect and you will be awarded as such.
I have more ideas on this and what is driving me this direction. I will share more later.
I have not heard from Marilyn or Joachim in quite along time. Having met Joachim at Paul's house and again with Marilyn in Munich, they are really good hearted.
Later,
Thomas
This is the idea.
- -1k every weekend starting the weekend of March 8,9 2008 and ending April 26/27 2008, for a total of eight weekends.
-The winner will be determined by the lowest total time (meaning we add up all the times).
-Each weekend will be capped at the best time you could receive (ie, the first weekend will be 3:25, then 3:20, then 3:15, then 3:10, then 3:05, then unlimited, then unlimited, then unlimited.
-It will be men's open and women's open.
To add:
You are allowed to miss two weekends but you have to make it up the next weekend or you can do it in advance. So, if you know you are going to miss week 2 and week 3, you could do two 1k's in week 1 and do two 1k's in week 4. The goal is to do a 1k each weekend, but in light of vacations and work commitments, it is possibly for someone to not be able to do a 1k each weekend.
You are allowed to miss two weekends but you have to make it up the next weekend or you can do it in advance. So, if you know you are going to miss week 2 and week 3, you could do two 1k's in week 1 and do two 1k's in week 4. The goal is to do a 1k each weekend, but in light of vacations and work commitments, it is possibly for someone to not be able to do a 1k each weekend.
could you explain more what you mean by this:
Can we row these as handicap rows online, so the fastest rowers wait to start? That makes the rowing more interesting for a mixed group, but makes the results in RP incorrect. At least for the first weeks until the "unlimited" weeks?
I am not sure I can race at maximum each week like that, and want to understand the sandbagging possibilities. I will never win either so scoring like this only matters for those at the top.Thomas wrote: -Each weekend will be capped at the best time you could receive (ie, the first weekend will be 3:25, then 3:20, then 3:15, then 3:10, then 3:05, then unlimited, then unlimited, then unlimited.
Can we row these as handicap rows online, so the fastest rowers wait to start? That makes the rowing more interesting for a mixed group, but makes the results in RP incorrect. At least for the first weeks until the "unlimited" weeks?
M 51 5'9'' (1.75m), a once and future lightweight
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Thinking about this more, I will take a guess:
Do you mean "capped" as in what we would call in the US "making the cut". So that everyone needs to row 3:25 or better in the first week to advance to the second week? Then 3:20 to advance to the 3rd week? So that slower rowers get eliminated and only the fastest remain to compete at the end?
If so that is fine by me. Hitting the 3:20 target is a season's goal and will be a huge PB; 3:15 may be out of reach, but I am ok with taking a shot at that.
Do you mean "capped" as in what we would call in the US "making the cut". So that everyone needs to row 3:25 or better in the first week to advance to the second week? Then 3:20 to advance to the 3rd week? So that slower rowers get eliminated and only the fastest remain to compete at the end?
If so that is fine by me. Hitting the 3:20 target is a season's goal and will be a huge PB; 3:15 may be out of reach, but I am ok with taking a shot at that.
M 51 5'9'' (1.75m), a once and future lightweight
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply. The time element is the fastest time a person could receive for that particular weekend. For example: The first weekend is 3:25. If I rowed 3:20, that is nice, but I can only be awarded a time of 3:25.
Unfortunately, I would rather stay away from handicapping. This distance is short enough that people should not get too far out.
Yes, this to encourage faster rowers and to encourage pushing ourselves.
Something just occurred to me: I don't have any idea on what times to choose for women.
Thanks for your reply. The time element is the fastest time a person could receive for that particular weekend. For example: The first weekend is 3:25. If I rowed 3:20, that is nice, but I can only be awarded a time of 3:25.
Unfortunately, I would rather stay away from handicapping. This distance is short enough that people should not get too far out.
Yes, this to encourage faster rowers and to encourage pushing ourselves.
Something just occurred to me: I don't have any idea on what times to choose for women.
So the plan appears to be to start this tomorrow. Thomas: do you have any idea how many people are interested or even know about this yet? I don't see anything on oarbits so far.
I am pretty free tomorrow, so I will put up a 1k at 16 gmt on the beta. But if anyone else puts up another row on the beta for tomorrow, I could always switch and join that instead. This week will hopefully be an "easy" row at around 3:30 for me. My understanding of the caps/targets is there no incentive to go faster than that in any week. So it doesn't get tough for me until the 3:15 week.
In terms of setting a targets for women: the men's target starts at 3:25, which is the 75% for all men over 30; the 75% for women over 30 is 4:05. But I think 4:05 is too fast practically for women, and there are only two women who have posted a time with rowpro faster than that. So I might start the women at the 50%, or 4:25, and go down from there.
I am pretty free tomorrow, so I will put up a 1k at 16 gmt on the beta. But if anyone else puts up another row on the beta for tomorrow, I could always switch and join that instead. This week will hopefully be an "easy" row at around 3:30 for me. My understanding of the caps/targets is there no incentive to go faster than that in any week. So it doesn't get tough for me until the 3:15 week.
In terms of setting a targets for women: the men's target starts at 3:25, which is the 75% for all men over 30; the 75% for women over 30 is 4:05. But I think 4:05 is too fast practically for women, and there are only two women who have posted a time with rowpro faster than that. So I might start the women at the 50%, or 4:25, and go down from there.
M 51 5'9'' (1.75m), a once and future lightweight
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13
I don't have an idea of how many people want to participate.
You may have to do this as a Time Trial, which means you are going solo and that is perfectly fine. That is why I have asked for a person who is participating to label their race as something that is distiguishable, such as, "Men's Open 1k 1st week."
I may do the 1k tomorrow but for sure on Sunday. I lifted weights tonight after work knowing I could do the 1k on Sunday.
If you are planning to participate, go ahead and proudly say so here.
Thanks,
Thomas
You may have to do this as a Time Trial, which means you are going solo and that is perfectly fine. That is why I have asked for a person who is participating to label their race as something that is distiguishable, such as, "Men's Open 1k 1st week."
I may do the 1k tomorrow but for sure on Sunday. I lifted weights tonight after work knowing I could do the 1k on Sunday.
If you are planning to participate, go ahead and proudly say so here.
Thanks,
Thomas