Watts vs. 500m split times

From the CRASH-B's to an online challenge, discuss the competitive side of erging here.
Post Reply
stanley1x
Paddler
Posts: 3
Joined: May 23rd, 2006, 6:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Watts vs. 500m split times

Post by stanley1x » January 28th, 2008, 6:21 pm

Is amyone aware of a table which compares 500m split times on the erg with their equivalent watts? Thanks

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Watts vs. 500m split times

Post by Bob S. » January 28th, 2008, 6:46 pm

stanley1x wrote:Is amyone aware of a table which compares 500m split times on the erg with their equivalent watts? Thanks
Use this:

http://www.machars.net/

It is better than the table which has large gaps.

Bob S.

User avatar
michaelb
2k Poster
Posts: 469
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:10 pm
Location: Burlington, Vermont

Post by michaelb » January 28th, 2008, 9:43 pm

this is my simple chart. I think it is easier to get a sense of the relationship from a chart that shows a range. I have this taped to my C2 from years ago, although I don't really look at it much these days:

1:10 pace=1020 watts
1:15 pace=830 watts
1:20 pace= 684 watts
1:25 pace= 570 watts
1:30 pace= 480 watts
1:35 pace= 408 watts
1:40 pace= 350 watts
1:45 pace=302 watts
1:50 pace=263 watts
1:55 pace=230 watts
2:00 pace=203 watts
2:05 pace=179 watts
2:10 pace=159 watts
2:15 pace=142 watts
2:20 pace=128 watts
2:25 pace=115 watts
2:30 pace=104 watts
M 51 5'9'' (1.75m), a once and future lightweight
Old PBs 500m-1:33.9 1K-3:18.6 2K-6:55.4 5K-18:17.6 10K-38:10.5 HM-1:24:00.1 FM-3:07.13

User avatar
kirbyt
Paddler
Posts: 39
Joined: June 23rd, 2007, 2:36 pm

Post by kirbyt » January 28th, 2008, 10:13 pm

A couple of months ago, I was obsessed with breaking 6:40. I made a try or two practically every weekend. Kept handling down with 400-600 to go. Seeing the splits in the 1:39's seemed to freak me out. I even resorted to using watts, knowing that I just had to average 350+. That didn't work either but I was intrigued by the fact that the watts seemed more exact than the /500m pacing ie. one pull would be 349 then 351 etc. , we're talking about some very slight differences here. It was interesting; haven't used it since though, there's just something about the watts that makes you feel like you're dealing with a machine. :wink:

Kirby
MLWT 45yrs. 5'11" 165lbs.[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1184995103.png[/img]

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Post by NavigationHazard » January 28th, 2008, 10:15 pm

There's also this chart I posted a while back:

http://www.c2forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=52376#52376
67 MH 6' 6"

User avatar
PaulS
10k Poster
Posts: 1212
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by PaulS » January 29th, 2008, 11:50 am

Image
Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."

stanley1x
Paddler
Posts: 3
Joined: May 23rd, 2006, 6:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Watts vs 500m split

Post by stanley1x » January 29th, 2008, 3:07 pm

Thank you all. Very helpful. Jonathan: see you in Boston.

WingedFoot
Paddler
Posts: 31
Joined: January 31st, 2008, 12:48 pm
Location: New York

Post by WingedFoot » January 31st, 2008, 1:15 pm

kirbyt wrote:A couple of months ago, I was obsessed with breaking 6:40.
And by the looks of your signature you achieved that goal! Congratulations B)
"Sit up like a doberman staring at a piece of steak"

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1201805699.png[/img]

User avatar
kirbyt
Paddler
Posts: 39
Joined: June 23rd, 2007, 2:36 pm

Post by kirbyt » February 3rd, 2008, 11:28 pm

Thanks, WingedFoot, I did. By the looks of your sig., you are very fast. :shock:

Kirby
MLWT 45yrs. 5'11" 165lbs.[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1184995103.png[/img]

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » February 13th, 2008, 1:39 am

Thanks for the watts charts. Very helpful.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

Post Reply