Hrm Question
-
[old] seawind161
- Posts: 0
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Product
Just a quick question re the HR data that is listed when you call up the details of an individual row (PM3):<br /><br />I always assumed the the HR figure listed for each split was the average for that split, but I used my Polar HRM today in addition, and the averages don't even come close to agreeing. <br /><br />So I'm guessing the PM3 is listing the HR at the end of the split? And if so, what is it listing as the HR for the overall row?<br /><br />Sorry if this should be obvious...<br /><br />Pete in Atlanta
-
[old] ehagberg
- Posts: 0
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Product
On the PM3, it takes the split data and averages it to give the average for the whole row... however if you do a just row session and the last "split" is jsut a few seconds and the data in that last split is way off the rest of the splits, it'll whack the average, as all splits are weighted equally.<br /><br />Someone from C2 seemed to imply that the HR data recorded for each split _was_ supposed to be the average for each of the splits... but it could very well be just the last good reading as the split boundary was crossed.
-
[old] seawind161
- Posts: 0
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Product
Thanks, all. After a couple more sessions with the Polar it became obvious that the "HR associated with each split is the "Ending" heartrate of the split, not the average", as Mark says.<br /><br />Pete in Atlanta<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><!--QuoteBegin-mlyons+Nov 20 2005, 05:09 AM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(mlyons @ Nov 20 2005, 05:09 AM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->That is correct. The HR associated with each split is the "Ending" heartrate of the split, not the average. The summary heartrate for a workout is the equally-weighted average of the split heartrates.<br /><br />Mark <br /> </td></tr></table><br />