What Training Have You Done Today???

[old] John Rupp · Post by **[old] John Rupp** » March 19th, 2005, 3:42 pm

Congratulations, Carl!!!!

[old] John Rupp · Post by **[old] John Rupp** » March 19th, 2005, 3:44 pm

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(ninthman @ Mar 18 2005, 11:51 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>1:53 for 21.096m?<br /><br />Sounds tough.<br /> </td></tr></table><br />Naa, it's only 1:53.76 for 21097m.

[old] Carl Henrik · Post by **[old] Carl Henrik** » March 19th, 2005, 4:25 pm

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(John Rupp @ Mar 19 2005, 07:42 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>Congratulations, Carl!!!! <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />Thanks John!

[old] TRIBUM · Post by **[old] TRIBUM** » March 19th, 2005, 7:10 pm

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(CAROLE MAC @ May 20 2004, 12:01 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>Well what have you done today ??????<br /><br />Me myself and I have done 60 mins...... 13,923metres at 2.09.2 29spm ... very very chuffed(happy) big pb <img src='http://users.telenet.be/eforum/emoticon ... oticon.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />.... oh and 2500m warm down/cool down total 16423 <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />I liked the link that PaulS posted when I asked a question about gloves, and he responded with "lace"... it was you and your girlfriends in lingerie! ha! that was hilarious! (see the posts about gloves in the GENERAL posts section to find it...)

[old] EChang · Post by **[old] EChang** » March 20th, 2005, 2:31 am

multiple 2 minute pieces against the boys 1 boat and the girls 1 boat(i'm in the boys 2 boat). 30 minute jog after practice

[old] hennmart · Post by **[old] hennmart** » March 20th, 2005, 7:32 am

Today a HM in 1:22:13.2. I rowed this HM without stopping (first time).<br /><br />Hennie

[old] John Rupp · Post by **[old] John Rupp** » March 20th, 2005, 3:06 pm

Hennie,<br /><br />Nice 21.097k ... which one is right.<br /><br />EChang,<br /><br />Cute avatar but why?

[old] hennmart · Post by **[old] hennmart** » March 20th, 2005, 5:32 pm

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(John Rupp @ Mar 20 2005, 10:06 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>Hennie,<br /><br />Nice 21.097k ... which one is right.<br /> <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />John,<br /><br />Your right and I have correct it.<br /><br />Hennie

[old] chickenlegs · Post by **[old] chickenlegs** » March 23rd, 2005, 6:15 am

this evening 12 km at 1:50.0 (21 spm).<br /><br />if the bottom doesn't give become a pain, i'll try to build it up to a half marathon (21 km).

[old] neilb · Post by **[old] neilb** » March 23rd, 2005, 1:10 pm

First venture into UT1 work after 10 weeks mainly AT work.<br /><br />60 min, df115, 24 spm HR capped at 80% HRR and average HR of 76%. Split was 1:56.9 (15,397m) which seems a little slow. My 60 min PB last week was at 1:51.7 and this was done with HR no more than 85% for most of the time so adding 5 seconds for the step down in HR seems a lot.<br /><br />It took quite a while to settle into the slower pace/stroke and I am not sure it ever became as relaxed as the AT work at lower pace/ higher spm. This may be due to the fact I had cycled 20k to the gym first and/or body adjusting to the different workout. (The 60 min PB was more or less a usual 30 min AT sessison just for twice as long!)<br /><br />I will probably stick with the 60 min UT1 sessions for a few weeks and see how it settles down.<br /><br />Neil

[old] hennmart · Post by **[old] hennmart** » March 25th, 2005, 1:34 pm

Today:<br />1. 6008 m. time 22:25,1 (my 6000 time is (still) 22:34,0) <br />2. 2000 m. time 7:09,5 new PB <br />3. 5008 m. time 19:53,9 cool down<br /><br />Hennie

[old] chickenlegs · Post by **[old] chickenlegs** » March 26th, 2005, 3:11 am

1500 m x 4:<br />1:40.0<br />1:39.0<br />1:39.0<br />1:37.7<br /><br />5' rest<br /><br />

[old] hennmart · Post by **[old] hennmart** » March 26th, 2005, 4:41 am

<table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(chickenlegs @ Mar 26 2005, 10:11 AM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'>1500 m x 4:<br />1:40.0<br />1:39.0<br />1:39.0<br />1:37.7<br /><br />5' rest <br /> </td></tr></table><br /><br />Chickenlegs,<br /><br />Fast times!<br /><br />Hennie

[old] Sir Pirate · Post by **[old] Sir Pirate** » March 26th, 2005, 5:16 am

I fancied a recovery row yestrday, was going to do 30mins, then thought just stick 21097m on the clock and see how far you get. Stuck The Matrix in the DVD player and started rowing. <br />Just plodded along, finished in 80:29.5 (1:54.5) 26spm, and for the 1st time my butt cheeks don't hurt after a HM <br /><br />Another thing, watching the Matrix makes a HM fly by <br /><br />Sir Pirate<br /><br />

[old] hennmart · Post by **[old] hennmart** » March 29th, 2005, 6:52 am

Yesterday I wanted to row a HM but I had to stop after 59 min. (tired). Today I rowerd the HM and bettered my PB. It was a good row!<br /><br />Hennie