Nomark wrote: ↑November 25th, 2024, 4:58 pm
Week 3 day 1. 6,000m. Same pace as 5,5k last week. I started going a bit fast last week so my aim was mid 2.20s at around 24 to speed up my slow stroke rate a little.
Code: Select all
Metres Time Pace Watts S/M
6,000m 28:57.8 2:24.8 115 24
1,200m 5:55.0 2:27.9 108 23
1,200m 5:47.0 2:24.5 116 24
1,200m 5:46.7 2:24.4 116 24
1,200m 5:44.3 2:23.4 119 24
1,200m 5:44.8 2:23.8 118 24
DF 125
Very pleased that I reined the pace in and almost managed a full negative split by accident. Felt reasonably good. I started slow on purpose with my fast 5.5k at the back of my mind and then struggled a bit in the middle - slept very badly last night so I'm blaming that. Pace was fine but it felt harder than I expected and the goal distance felt long. But after the first 2,500 settled in nicely and felt like I was in a true SS and could have gone the same again (I couldnt have, this is the furthest I've ever rowed. But I *felt* like I could've!). I was also able to row quite consistently with the live split time not changing by even a second for several strokes in a row (a new one for me!). And I got to watch Brad Pitt and Eric Bana fight each other in Troy for entertainment, so all in all a very enjoyable half hour. HR hit a high of 100 apparently. Don't believe the Fitbit (it was 152 yesterday after getting Christmas decs down from the loft!) so might ask Santa for a chest monitor.
Hopefully be able to do splits tomorrow - 2x2,000m at around 2.20-2.22. Sounds easy - touch wood.
Just note that even if it feels quite hard, you
canrow faster - you have it in you. Our brain deliberately restricts our max effort. I find with good music I can significantly speed up and still not be that hard.
[3 x 1000m / 3min rest] – A new interval session now, working around the same intensity as the 6 x 500m session you did in week 1 (and perhaps as an optional session last week). Try for the same pace you did for that session in week 1.
The target was completely conservative. I managed 4:17.x r22, 4:16.x r23, and 4:10.x r23 at UT1 (the first 2 lower end, the last one upper end). I should increase my intensity to AT (can speak a couple words pace). Perhaps I start at 2:07 and go lower, or even be more ambitious and try a 2:05-2:06 target.
Before that I warmed up with ~2:25 strapless at r18, with some very strong strokes at 2:01 r20. Then I did some 1:58 ish strokes at r20. I wasn't tired after that... it was just my warmup. But yes, I understand the difficulty. That's why I need to row.
Using the force curves for Concept 2 for my warmup (used Skillrow for the rows)... the first half is decent but the second half is quite tragic - going down and then the force curve only going down a bit before gradually going down. Bad transition between upper body and legs.
Day 3 I will keep a 2:18 split but progressively lower the stroke rate to 18 or even 17, in preparation for my 1:59.x 20-minute r20 ~2 months later. I don't have high hopes for it but I will continue rowing more and refining my technique. That's my only hope...
This is what happens when you start rowing without experience in high school. Without a huge fitness base it's gonna be difficult to catch up to university standards even in a relatively lenient place.
I had eggs after my training. I need the protein I can get to build muscle, and bulk up a couple kilos before my semester 2 tryouts.
PS. Wow Nomark. Your SS is mid 2:20s and yet your intervals are nearly 2:00. What a huge differenve! Meanwhile my SS is 2:18 at UT2 while I am struggling to get my intervals to 2:05 let alone 2:00 (tho to be fair I did the 2:05 one at upper UT1, not above AT). Your 2k is a 8:10, meanwhile... I am not sure if I have a 8:10 2k right now.
While I am still significantly slower in SS (though to be fair I plan to stick at UT2 pace and lower my stroke rate to 18) and especially intervals (beginners going sub 2:00 or close on intervals, versus my lagging 2:07 now) I have now closed part of the gap, and at least 20 minute r20 in a bit over 2 months does not seem delusional for now.