Display for avg/500m

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
Fox97
Paddler
Posts: 2
Joined: August 13th, 2024, 6:31 am

Display for avg/500m

Post by Fox97 » August 13th, 2024, 6:41 am

Hello! I am very confused on the timing of the display. I have been doing the row for a few years now but I wanted to train to go faster. I found multiple YT videos for sub 7, which is what I want but when following along I realized, even with the same pace and pulling with back my AVE shows like 30s more than others. Below is what I normally do, then below that is what I tried to follow, but mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?

Avg 35s/m
2000m
Avg time 8:33
2:06 AVE/500m
Drag factor avg 137

Below is one of the links I was following in pace.
30s/m
2000m
Time 6:58
1:45 AVE/500M

https://youtu.be/H6ob3xQYhhM?si=-6BBHvTG_VBWHQIh

gvcormac
6k Poster
Posts: 647
Joined: April 20th, 2022, 10:27 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by gvcormac » August 13th, 2024, 7:55 am

There are two ways to increase your pace: (1) pull harder; (2) increase your stroke rate.

Your stroke rate is plenty high, so I suggest you pull harder.

If your pull is speed limited you can try higher df; otherwise maybe even lower df. Lower df gives you faster drive which is fine so long as you pull just as hard.

If you play with the PM5 you can make it display your force curve. I don't usually but you might find it useful.

Sakly
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3355
Joined: January 13th, 2022, 10:49 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by Sakly » August 13th, 2024, 8:19 am

You need to understand that the power that goes into the machine is not entirely depending on the strokes per minute and the length/form of the stroke. So if two persons pull at the same rate with the same stroke length, their pace can easily differ by 30s/500 or even more.
The pace is mainly depending on the strokes length and the acceleration during the drive. Pushing harder at the same rate with the same length gives you more acceleration (shorter drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes at the same acceleration (longer drive time) = faster pace. Longer strokes with more acceleration = much faster pace. All at the same rate.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log

hikeplusrow
2k Poster
Posts: 304
Joined: September 16th, 2023, 8:07 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by hikeplusrow » August 13th, 2024, 8:39 am

Rowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously :)

JaapvanE
10k Poster
Posts: 1301
Joined: January 4th, 2022, 2:49 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by JaapvanE » August 13th, 2024, 9:17 am

hikeplusrow wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 8:39 am
Rowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously :)
Unless the group agrees on a certain pace, then you can also have the same distance. That is what we do with the saturday group rows on EXR: several people have agreed to always row the same pace durng that session, allowing groups to form around them. We start all at the same time, the groups form naturally, and the pace groups finish together.

iain
10k Poster
Posts: 1122
Joined: October 11th, 2007, 6:56 am
Location: Reading, UK

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by iain » August 13th, 2024, 9:27 am

Most people cannot maintain a strong stroke at 35 strokes per minute for 2k. Remember that the "boat" keeps moving between strokes and so you want to produce strong strokes so that it is travelling fast. Then we go up the slide at a controlled pace to give your muscles time to recover sufficiently to repeat the strong stroke to accelerate the "boat" again. You are using quite a high DF. You might like to try lowering this to see if this allows you to get a smoother faster drive. It is common at the gym to see people at 35+ SpM pulling paces that would take>10min for a 2k and usually stopping exhausted after 500m or so, so your performance is better than most.
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/

hikeplusrow
2k Poster
Posts: 304
Joined: September 16th, 2023, 8:07 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by hikeplusrow » August 13th, 2024, 10:33 am

JaapvanE wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 9:17 am
hikeplusrow wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 8:39 am
Rowalongs are best done to time rather than distance, as everyone finishes simultaneously :)
Unless the group agrees on a certain pace, then you can also have the same distance. That is what we do with the saturday group rows on EXR: several people have agreed to always row the same pace durng that session, allowing groups to form around them. We start all at the same time, the groups form naturally, and the pace groups finish together.
Good idea. I hadn't thought of that.

dabatey
2k Poster
Posts: 485
Joined: September 9th, 2021, 12:27 pm

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by dabatey » August 13th, 2024, 10:54 am

Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 6:41 am
Hello! I am very confused on the timing of the display. I have been doing the row for a few years now but I wanted to train to go faster. I found multiple YT videos for sub 7, which is what I want but when following along I realized, even with the same pace and pulling with back my AVE shows like 30s more than others. Below is what I normally do, then below that is what I tried to follow, but mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?

Avg 35s/m
2000m
Avg time 8:33
2:06 AVE/500m
Drag factor avg 137

Below is one of the links I was following in pace.
30s/m
2000m
Time 6:58
1:45 AVE/500M

https://youtu.be/H6ob3xQYhhM?si=-6BBHvTG_VBWHQIh
It's pretty possible with a quick recovery back up the slide to pull lightly with a slowish drive and have a high s/m with a slowish average pace. With good technique you pull hard and fast and have a quick drive, and then recover back up the slide slowly.

That said. My first attempt at a 2k was exactly the same as yours (8min 33sec) as you can see in my signature. If you are extremely light and short like myself(60kg/173cm) it's not that bad a time at all for a first shot I don't think, however if you are a fair bit heavier and taller than me then you need to pull a bit harder as you should be beating a flyweight like me.

Once you pull a bit harder your s/m will inevitably come down to mid/high twenties I imagine but that's not a bad thing and gives room for improvement with more fitness.
Age 52....Weight 61 Kg....
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]

Fox97
Paddler
Posts: 2
Joined: August 13th, 2024, 6:31 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by Fox97 » August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm

Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by Citroen » August 13th, 2024, 1:47 pm

Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
Or better, try to PUSH with your legs, since rowing is a legs sport.

gvcormac
6k Poster
Posts: 647
Joined: April 20th, 2022, 10:27 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by gvcormac » August 13th, 2024, 7:40 pm

Citroen wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 1:47 pm
Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
Or better, try to PUSH with your legs, since rowing is a legs sport.
I think this is a distinction without a difference. If you want to lift a piano, you push with your legs, arguably more than you pull with your arms. But you're still lifting. Same with rowing. Thinking about what muscles you are using is a distraction. You want to yank the handle back as hard as you can as far as you can, without losing your balance at the end.

jamesg
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4191
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
Location: Trentino Italy

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by jamesg » August 14th, 2024, 1:33 am

mine still shows over an extra 30s/m. Is mine broke or is something else happening?
No it's not broke.

The machine is for training. We train by doing what we can. But not too much.

Rowing is a very difficult sport, it won't come immediately, so keep trying.

The machine measures a thing called Work; but some of us can do more work than others, depending on how big, how old and what sex we are.

In any case your 2:06 pace is 175Watt, so you're certainly not just idling along, like I do at 120W.
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.

dabatey
2k Poster
Posts: 485
Joined: September 9th, 2021, 12:27 pm

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by dabatey » August 14th, 2024, 2:46 am

Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but lowering the drag factor a bit 'might' help to get a good drive speed dependent on how big and powerful you are. Certainly helps skinny me to be at a df of around 110 instead of 140.
Age 52....Weight 61 Kg....
Row 26 Aug 21 to Mar 22. Cycle Mar 22 to Jun 24. Now mixing the 2.
2K 8.02.3 (23 Oct 21)...7.37.0(15 Mar 22)
5K 22.14 (2 Oct 21)
Resting HR 45 (was 48 in 2021)....Max HR (Seen) 182 [185 cycling]

Joebasscat
2k Poster
Posts: 245
Joined: February 14th, 2020, 10:05 pm

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by Joebasscat » August 14th, 2024, 5:46 am

dabatey wrote:
August 14th, 2024, 2:46 am
Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but lowering the drag factor a bit 'might' help to get a good drive speed dependent on how big and powerful you are. Certainly helps skinny me to be at a df of around 110 instead of 140.
I’ll second the 110 DF for this LW as well. To each his own…
65 5’-11” 72.5 kg

Sakly
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3355
Joined: January 13th, 2022, 10:49 am

Re: Display for avg/500m

Post by Sakly » August 14th, 2024, 6:52 am

Joebasscat wrote:
August 14th, 2024, 5:46 am
dabatey wrote:
August 14th, 2024, 2:46 am
Fox97 wrote:
August 13th, 2024, 12:52 pm
Thank you for the replies. I will work on the form and try and pull harder.
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but lowering the drag factor a bit 'might' help to get a good drive speed dependent on how big and powerful you are. Certainly helps skinny me to be at a df of around 110 instead of 140.
I’ll second the 110 DF for this LW as well. To each his own…
No lightweight here (neither a big heavyweight :lol: ), using ca. 140 for 2ks. But on my steadies on low rates I like to reduce drag to 100+- a few points.
On higher rates the more aggressive slow down of the flywheel is ok, as you pick up again earlier compared to a low rate steady.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:16.1
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log

Post Reply