Workout ‘rankings’

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
Post Reply
elpaca
Paddler
Posts: 16
Joined: April 21st, 2022, 7:00 pm

Workout ‘rankings’

Post by elpaca » January 4th, 2024, 9:13 pm

Might not be an easy answer to this one but I wanted to know if you’re chasing a specific goal like 2k improvement and you have to miss a workout for whatever reason, how you decide whether to play catch up on it or just to keep going with the program?

For example - if on the Pete Plan and you miss a 4x2000m day, is it better to just get steady state 15km meters in the next day, or should you absolutely ensure that you get that middle distance pain in.

I guess I’m effectively asking the ‘value’ of each of the workouts in a plan like the PP. Might not matter too much if it’s just one or two either, but if it’s becoming a common trend then you’ll start to see negative effects?
M - '87 - 5’7” - 190lb

500m: 1:39.2 (Nov23)
1k: 3:30.5 (Dec23)
2k: 6:59.0 (Jan24)
5k: 19:18.2 (Aug23)
HM: 1:27:38.0 (Nov23)
FM: 2:58:59.5 (Apr24)

"I want you to remember two things. Do it right. Finish it. Very simple. Do it right. Finish it."

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10427
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Workout ‘rankings’

Post by Dangerscouse » January 5th, 2024, 2:11 am

The steady stuff should be there to accommodate the harder stuff, so, assuming that you're sufficiently recovered, the 4 x 2k should take priority.

I say 'should' as we're sometimes inclined to take the easier option due to laziness, or you might intuitively need an easier session, but it's an unavoidable fact that the harder sessions are where the magic happens.
50 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

aussie nick
10k Poster
Posts: 1375
Joined: June 21st, 2021, 7:12 pm

Re: Workout ‘rankings’

Post by aussie nick » January 5th, 2024, 2:57 am

elpaca wrote:
January 4th, 2024, 9:13 pm
Might not be an easy answer to this one but I wanted to know if you’re chasing a specific goal like 2k improvement and you have to miss a workout for whatever reason, how you decide whether to play catch up on it or just to keep going with the program?

For example - if on the Pete Plan and you miss a 4x2000m day, is it better to just get steady state 15km meters in the next day, or should you absolutely ensure that you get that middle distance pain in.

I guess I’m effectively asking the ‘value’ of each of the workouts in a plan like the PP. Might not matter too much if it’s just one or two either, but if it’s becoming a common trend then you’ll start to see negative effects?
for me, when I was going Pete's Plan, the two interval sessions were what I built my week around and then I did as much steady state as I could fit in...generally either 2 or 3 sessions...and occasionally one of these 'steady state' would be a harder distance piece. But I always wanted to beat my time from the previous parallel interval session 3 weeks earlier and that was how I measure my progress outside of time trials every 9 weeks
M/52/6ft/86kg
took up rowing during pandemic

500m 1.26.9
1k 3.08.2
2k 6.39.7
5k 18.02.2
30min 8008m

Post Reply