Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Not sure where you should be posting? Put it here.
User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by johnlvs2run » December 28th, 2023, 6:36 pm

I've been using Rayovac.
That's what the originals were. They lasted a long time and had a lower price than the others.
They were less than $4 for 4 of them a few years ago at Walmart, and now they are $7 for 4 of them.
I wonder if checking the compartment every month or so would be helpful to make sure they're not leaking.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

gvcormac
6k Poster
Posts: 676
Joined: April 20th, 2022, 10:27 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by gvcormac » December 28th, 2023, 6:42 pm

johnlvs2run wrote:
December 28th, 2023, 6:36 pm
I've been using Rayovac.
That's what the originals were. They lasted a long time and had a lower price than the others.
They were less than $4 for 4 of them a few years ago at Walmart, and now they are $7 for 4 of them.
I wonder if checking the compartment every month or so would be helpful to make sure they're not leaking.
The PM5 will warn you if the charge is low. They won't leak so long as they have a charge.

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4692
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Carl Watts » December 28th, 2023, 10:11 pm

gvcormac wrote:
December 28th, 2023, 6:42 pm
johnlvs2run wrote:
December 28th, 2023, 6:36 pm
I've been using Rayovac.
That's what the originals were. They lasted a long time and had a lower price than the others.
They were less than $4 for 4 of them a few years ago at Walmart, and now they are $7 for 4 of them.
I wonder if checking the compartment every month or so would be helpful to make sure they're not leaking.
The PM5 will warn you if the charge is low. They won't leak so long as they have a charge.
They can fail at anytime, the only technology that is pretty much 100% leakproof is Lithium.

If you wanted to go overboard you would put 6 Lithium AA batteries in the D size adapter. These would probably last 3 or 4 years in a new PM5. This is a pretty expensive option but still less than fixing the PM5 after a battery leak. The first gen PM5 did NOT have a sealed battery compartment and a leak in one of these will kill it. Gen 2 to 4 now have a sealed compartment.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

AussieTom
Paddler
Posts: 1
Joined: December 29th, 2023, 7:02 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by AussieTom » December 29th, 2023, 7:07 am

Duracells are rubbish. I've bought brand new packs of 10 and found more than half are effectively dead fresh out of the pack. I've opened new packs with batteries already leaking too. My recommendation is (made in Japan) Panasonic Evolta alkalines. Never had one fail.

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4692
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Carl Watts » December 29th, 2023, 4:58 pm

AussieTom wrote:
December 29th, 2023, 7:07 am
Duracells are rubbish. I've bought brand new packs of 10 and found more than half are effectively dead fresh out of the pack. I've opened new packs with batteries already leaking too. My recommendation is (made in Japan) Panasonic Evolta alkalines. Never had one fail.
Interesting feedback, not been that unlucky but certainly the D size has been more unreliable from new. I have had the odd one rapidly self discharge and die very early when the other one in the monitor is ok.

Ni-MH batteries like the Varta ones have come a long way, they no longer self discharge rapidly and still hold a charge 12 months out. Smart chargers for these are cheap and the AA capacity is like 2100mAhr. The PM5 current draw now is very low and with the newer TACH pickup it provides all the power to the monitor as you row so effectively while the PM5 is in standby the batteries are only backing up the date and time and the current draw is extremely low. 6 AA rechargeable's should last 12 months.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

HornetMaX
5k Poster
Posts: 523
Joined: September 14th, 2021, 5:41 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by HornetMaX » January 9th, 2024, 7:09 am

Interesting discussion.

My RowErg PM5 is almost 2.5yo and I'm still on my 1st set of D cells (original ones, Rayovac, PM5 says they are now at 40%), my SkiErg is too recent (batteries still at 99%).

I kind of like the idea of using rechargeable (Ni-MH) batteries (3xAAs + adapter or simply rechargeable Ds).
But would Ni-MH Ds be any better than Alkaline Ds in terms of leakage risk ? Or is the risk reduction there only if you move to AAs (due to lower volume) ? And are Ni-MH less risky compared to Alkaline ?

Also, I've found here some adapters 1xAA --> 1xD: of course capacity is way smaller (typically 2,000-2,400 vs 10,000mAh) but usually I have plenty of AAs at hand and it's easy to swap 2 AAs instead of puling out 6 and wait to charge them. WDYT ?
1973, 173cm (5'8"), LW, started rowing Sep 2021 (after 10 years of being a couch potato), c2 log
RowErg PBs:
Image

Dangerscouse
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10662
Joined: April 27th, 2014, 11:11 am
Location: Liverpool, England

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Dangerscouse » January 9th, 2024, 8:10 am

HornetMaX wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 7:09 am
My RowErg PM5 is almost 2.5yo and I'm still on my 1st set of D cells (original ones, Rayovac, PM5 says they are now at 40%), my SkiErg is too recent (batteries still at 99%).
I've had my erg for just over five years, and I don't think I've changed the batteries. I might have, but if I have it's not been for a few years. IIRC, there is still circa 60% charge remaining.

I'd stick with the D's if you haven't had an issue.
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km

"You reap what you row"

Instagram: stuwenman

Sakly
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 3480
Joined: January 13th, 2022, 10:49 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Sakly » January 9th, 2024, 8:55 am

Dangerscouse wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 8:10 am
HornetMaX wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 7:09 am
My RowErg PM5 is almost 2.5yo and I'm still on my 1st set of D cells (original ones, Rayovac, PM5 says they are now at 40%), my SkiErg is too recent (batteries still at 99%).
I've had my erg for just over five years, and I don't think I've changed the batteries. I might have, but if I have it's not been for a few years. IIRC, there is still circa 60% charge remaining.

I'd stick with the D's if you haven't had an issue.
My erg is reaching 2 years this month, ~4.5mm. No idea where I can lookup the battery level, but the symbol in the top bar of PM5 shows a full symbol.
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log

HornetMaX
5k Poster
Posts: 523
Joined: September 14th, 2021, 5:41 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by HornetMaX » January 9th, 2024, 9:37 am

Sakly wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 8:55 am
My erg is reaching 2 years this month, ~4.5mm. No idea where I can lookup the battery level, but the symbol in the top bar of PM5 shows a full symbol.
On the PM5 main/home screen: More Options / Utilities / Battery.
1973, 173cm (5'8"), LW, started rowing Sep 2021 (after 10 years of being a couch potato), c2 log
RowErg PBs:
Image

Willy.VdW
1k Poster
Posts: 155
Joined: September 5th, 2022, 11:31 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Willy.VdW » January 9th, 2024, 5:09 pm

Today I found a leaking AA battery in a digital (wall) thermometer.
The device draws little current and was still working normal.
The 2 AA's are in parrallel, so it runs on 1.5V and will still run for a while on just one battery.
The PM5's batteries are wired in series, but it does mean that you can't trust a battery to be
safe as long as the device containing it is still working.
The leaking battery was a...Duracell AA :shock:

gvcormac
6k Poster
Posts: 676
Joined: April 20th, 2022, 10:27 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by gvcormac » January 9th, 2024, 7:32 pm

Willy.VdW wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 5:09 pm
Today I found a leaking AA battery in a digital (wall) thermometer.
The device draws little current and was still working normal.
The 2 AA's are in parrallel, so it runs on 1.5V and will still run for a while on just one battery.
The PM5's batteries are wired in series, but it does mean that you can't trust a battery to be
safe as long as the device containing it is still working.
The leaking battery was a...Duracell AA :shock:
If they're parallel it is possible that the leaking one was dead, and the other was carrying the load.

Willy.VdW
1k Poster
Posts: 155
Joined: September 5th, 2022, 11:31 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by Willy.VdW » January 10th, 2024, 3:51 am

gvcormac wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 7:32 pm
If they're parallel it is possible that the leaking one was dead, and the other was carrying the load.
That's exactly what happened, the leaking battery had very low voltage, the other was good.
This is why I decided to share, to warn not to be confident that batteries are ok as long as
a device is (still) working.

HornetMaX
5k Poster
Posts: 523
Joined: September 14th, 2021, 5:41 am

Re: Duracell D size batteries are no longer any good.

Post by HornetMaX » January 10th, 2024, 4:17 am

Willy.VdW wrote:
January 10th, 2024, 3:51 am
gvcormac wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 7:32 pm
If they're parallel it is possible that the leaking one was dead, and the other was carrying the load.
That's exactly what happened, the leaking battery had very low voltage, the other was good.
This is why I decided to share, to warn not to be confident that batteries are ok as long as
a device is (still) working.
This is also why I was thinking about using 2xAA (NiMH) instead of 2xD (NiMH or Alkaline): having to swap/recharge them more often (let's say 2 Ds last 2 years, 2 AAs at a quarter of capacity will last 6 months, still not an annoying frequency) forces you to open the compartment more often. That (more frequent checks) plus the smaller battery volume (smaller leakage, if it happens) sounds like a nice risk reduction.

But I'm not sure how the PM5 evaluates the battery charge %, guess this will be thrown off by using NiMH and/or lower capacity batteries.

Or maybe KISS approach: just check the compartment every 2 months and stick with Ds. Money savings are not huge anyway (unless you run dozens of Ergs).
Dangerscouse wrote:
January 9th, 2024, 8:10 am
I'd stick with the D's if you haven't had an issue.
I'm a fan of "If it ain't broke, don't touch it" approach, but in this case I guess the point is that when you have the issue (D leaking), it's bad.
1973, 173cm (5'8"), LW, started rowing Sep 2021 (after 10 years of being a couch potato), c2 log
RowErg PBs:
Image

Post Reply