Thanks! Glad to be here
Drag Factor readings
Re: Drag Factor readings
In theory, yes. But then your pace should be way off, and the force curve would be a total mess....MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 22nd, 2023, 10:33 amI'm no techy but that was my thinking - it's a live read and should be stable, unless there's something amiss with the magnets you mention, could that be?
-
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: June 23rd, 2013, 3:32 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Drag Factor readings
95% sure to be a dirty cage and really simple 10 minute job to take the perforated strip out and clean it and the fan. DF will be >200.MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 21st, 2023, 9:21 amI live close to sea level and the rower is set up in my garage where it is currently quite cold - all of which I've read should support normal drag. I have a 90-day warranty on the machine, but I don't want the inconvenience (and shipping cost) of returning it if it can be avoided.
I'd welcome any ideas or suggestions about what the issue could be, both mechanical and electronic.
Many thanks!
Lindsay
73yo 93kg
Sydney Australia
Forum Flyer
PBs (65y+) 1 min 349m, 500m 1:29.8, 1k 3:11.7 2k 6:47.4, 5km 18:07.9, 30' 7928m, 10k 37:57.2, 60' 15368m
73yo 93kg
Sydney Australia
Forum Flyer
PBs (65y+) 1 min 349m, 500m 1:29.8, 1k 3:11.7 2k 6:47.4, 5km 18:07.9, 30' 7928m, 10k 37:57.2, 60' 15368m
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 11
- Joined: November 21st, 2023, 8:50 am
Re: Drag Factor readings
Nope, the machine was fully serviced and refurbished by the seller. Very clean everywhere.
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 11
- Joined: November 21st, 2023, 8:50 am
Re: Drag Factor readings
@jamesg - you win! The inlet had around 30-40cm clearance from the adjacent wall, so I wasn't hopeful, but when I tripled that distance the DF jumped to exactly where it should be. Great tip! ThanksMrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 22nd, 2023, 10:38 amInteresting! It is currently positioned with the inlet facing a wall close by. I will move it and check again! As for the blades, i will open it up and check. So far I've only inspected with a light through the grille and the perforated panel. That's enough to see it's very clean inside, much harder to check for missing blades. That said, the seller seems pretty thorough on the refurb, so I'll be surprised if he missed that! Thanks.
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 11
- Joined: November 21st, 2023, 8:50 am
Re: Drag Factor readings
@jamesg wins! The low DF was down to the rower being too close to a wall. It had around 30-40cm clearance, so I wasn't hopeful, but when I tripled that distance the DF jumped to instantly to where it should be. Very happy - that was the easiest possible solution
Re: Drag Factor readings
Perfect!
Happy rowing
Happy rowing
Male - '80 - 82kg - 177cm - Start rowErg Jan 2022
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
1': 358m
4': 1217m
30'r20: 8068m
30': 8,283m
60': 16,222m
100m: 0:15.9
500m: 1:26.0
1k: 3:07.8
2k: 6:37.1
5k: 17:39.6
6k: 21:03.5
10k: 36:01.5
HM: 1:18:40.1
FM: 2:52:32.6
My log
Re: Drag Factor readings
I'm very pleased for you, but surprised. Maybe you are talking about the right side of the cage (?) as that is open in my setup. But the end of my erg is only 9cm from the wall, left side 75cm, and I get >200 on 10.MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 10:35 amThe low DF was down to the rower being too close to a wall.
Mike - 67 HWT 183
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 11
- Joined: November 21st, 2023, 8:50 am
Re: Drag Factor readings
Yes, that's right, it was positioned with the grille on the right side about 30-40cm from a wall.MPx wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 12:50 pmI'm very pleased for you, but surprised. Maybe you are talking about the right side of the cage (?) as that is open in my setup. But the end of my erg is only 9cm from the wall, left side 75cm, and I get >200 on 10.MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 10:35 amThe low DF was down to the rower being too close to a wall.
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 304
- Joined: September 16th, 2023, 8:07 am
- Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Re: Drag Factor readings
I've often wondered what the parameters are with regard to this (as you do!). Do C2 have any recommendations as to how how far from a solid surface the cage needs to be?MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 3:31 pmYes, that's right, it was positioned with the grille on the right side about 30-40cm from a wall.MPx wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 12:50 pmI'm very pleased for you, but surprised. Maybe you are talking about the right side of the cage (?) as that is open in my setup. But the end of my erg is only 9cm from the wall, left side 75cm, and I get >200 on 10.MrGoodtimes75 wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2023, 10:35 amThe low DF was down to the rower being too close to a wall.
Re: Drag Factor readings
I thought this would be a reasonable place to share some recent research I did on my own Model D/PM5. That rower was new in October 2020 when I replaced my Model B/PM5. That PM5 replaced the PM (1) that came on the Model B when I bought it used in 2003.
My drag factors in standard configuration range from 78 to 213.
With cage removed (open fan) drag factor was 208.
With the cage back on but no screen, range was 99 to 333.
With the screen on but mostly blocked with tape range was 46 to 56.
With this in mind, anyone could make minor adjustment to have their drag range from 45 to 333.
We know there can be variations among machines and depend on machine cleanliness.
Obviously, you wouldn't want to go without a screen completely if there was the possibility of fingers or other objects entering the fan. Other modifications to decrease the resistance from the screen could be done if you wanted to safely increase the drag above the standard range.
My drag factors in standard configuration range from 78 to 213.
With cage removed (open fan) drag factor was 208.
With the cage back on but no screen, range was 99 to 333.
With the screen on but mostly blocked with tape range was 46 to 56.
With this in mind, anyone could make minor adjustment to have their drag range from 45 to 333.
We know there can be variations among machines and depend on machine cleanliness.
Obviously, you wouldn't want to go without a screen completely if there was the possibility of fingers or other objects entering the fan. Other modifications to decrease the resistance from the screen could be done if you wanted to safely increase the drag above the standard range.
Re: Drag Factor readings
Shock cord replacement will sort out the drag factor. You have mentioned chain and everything else apart from this. I replaced mine and the drag factor returned to where it should be at....Damper 5 (high) = 130 with new chord. Damper 5 (high) = 112 with old chord.
Reason would be loss of elasticity over time (of the shock cord).
Reason would be loss of elasticity over time (of the shock cord).
Re: Drag Factor readings
I have to agree with this ^^^^ I don't see any logical the bungee cord stiffness can have a measurable effect on the DF.
Was it just a coincidence? Perhaps during the process of changing the bungee some other variable changed that did affect the DF.
Was it just a coincidence? Perhaps during the process of changing the bungee some other variable changed that did affect the DF.
Re: Drag Factor readings
All praise to Occam's razor.Great tip!
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
Late 2024: stroke 4W-min@20-22.
Late 2024: stroke 4W-min@20-22.