https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ub9DyTBTg ... JyYXkgZXJnrobhely wrote: ↑November 11th, 2023, 8:58 pmI'm really struggling to understand how not dropping the arms at low rates on long sessions doesn't waste energy. To hold the arms up high at the start of the return feels like really hard work and not sustainable, but it seems to work for some. All the coaching I've seen online also supports dropping the arms, but perhaps there are coaches out there I haven't seen who advocate differently? I'm really surprised to hear that it seems common to keep the straight line, I'd always assumed that everyone did the dip at low rates.Sakly wrote: ↑November 11th, 2023, 8:28 amFor me it's different.
On longer steady state rows I drop my arms naturally and pick them up on the catch, this is much more relaxing for me.
On hard pieces with high rates I do as described by both of you - keep a straight line, as this produces the least wobble of the chain and it's the shortest way of getting back to catch.
After much experimentation, I've arrived at the same technique as you: dropping the arms at low rates and keeping a straight line at high rates.
One thing dropping the arms is really good for is learning the correct timing of the sequence. With high arms, the knees can bend too soon on the return without a rollercoaster motion. Low arms forces the arms to get away from the body before the knees come up.
I've posted a steady state session from Eric Murray that is what I'm referring to. Fast forward to about six mins, and that's the 'straight line' that I'm taliking about.
Maybe we're talking about the same thing, as 'high arms' can be misinterpreted. I pull to my sternum so my arms aren't ever very high, and the handle will almost skim my knees as they rise and fall, but it's still a straight line to all intents and purposes. This is possibly due to my physiology / leg length
What I'm saying not to do is really drop the handle, but after watching the OP's second video, I'd also not advocate keeping the arms that high either.