EastClintwood wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 5:01 am
But I am of course interested in seeing progress. And when I see people rowing SS at ~2:05 with a HR of ~120, I start to wonder if I'll ever get somewhere close to that point when I'm now at ~2:20 with a HR of ~140? Even when I stick to a consistent routine, this seems completely out of reach. And as I said, it's not like I'm a complete unhealthy, overweighted sports noobie. I also wouldn't expect a big jump due to noobie gains anymore, as I'm already 12 weeks on the rower.
I'm just curious why my base fitness seems so bad and where I could get. Oh and while we're at it: I was doing a 2k a month ago and ended at 7:48. I know it's a big jump but would you think it's realistic to make it to a sub7 one day? If yes, how long would that probably take?
And one last thing: you recommended to go up to 20 spm. Whats the point in that compared to 18 spm?
Don't lose sight of the fact that you might be more suited to faster / shorter types of sports. Physiology and genetics matter, so you might be more fast twitch dominant, so endurance is harder to make progress on.
You've been rowing for 12 weeks, which is a very short period of time. It's a common issue for someone who is generally fit & active to be more impatient on the rower. It hurts the ego to go from really competent, maybe even advanced, at other sports to a beginner at rowing.
I've not got much historic data for my HR for steady sessions, mainly as I didn't start using it regularly until about two years ago, but my HR was circa 130 for a 2:05 session back then. Also IIRC, Buchan Cameron, a former GB rower, mentioned how his UT2 was circa 2:02 to start with but it's probably more like 1:48 now.
It takes a lot of time for it to reduce, but I'd also add that even though mine is circa 120 for that pace, I've seen plenty of people with higher a HR that are still quicker than me overall. It's not something that wholly dictates your ability, and I've failed quite a lot of sessions when my HR is still only at circa 90%. I'd also like to add that I've been rowing, on and off, for almost 23 years.
Mitchell has covered the stroke rate question. I personally find r18, at a faster pace, is a harder effort than r20 or r22, so it's finding what suits you, and your HR may drop slightly an increase in stroke rate.
Sub 7 is the gold standard for a reason: it's hard, and not everyone will be able to do it. Keep focused on smaller bite sized chunks, and when you can relatively comfortably reach 7:30, or maybe even closer to 7:20, then you're in the right place to start considering sub 7, but it's still a lot of effort.
51 HWT; 6' 4"; 1k= 3:09; 2k= 6:36; 5k= 17:19; 6k= 20:47; 10k= 35:46 30mins= 8,488m 60mins= 16,618m HM= 1:16.47; FM= 2:40:41; 50k= 3:16:09; 100k= 7:52:44; 12hrs = 153km
"You reap what you row"
Instagram: stuwenman