Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
RowRinseRepeat
500m Poster
Posts: 58
Joined: September 2nd, 2018, 2:16 pm

Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by RowRinseRepeat » September 24th, 2018, 3:52 pm

Can anyone recommend a good method for measuring Max HR, especially with stepped intervals (a member in Sydney mentioned the Australian Institute of Sports stepped method, where a person is measured in 6 intervals and the Max is taken in the last interval).

User avatar
Mark E
2k Poster
Posts: 297
Joined: July 29th, 2018, 1:26 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Mark E » September 24th, 2018, 4:11 pm

RowRinseRepeat wrote:
September 24th, 2018, 3:52 pm
Can anyone recommend a good method for measuring Max HR, especially with stepped intervals (a member in Sydney mentioned the Australian Institute of Sports stepped method, where a person is measured in 6 intervals and the Max is taken in the last interval).
It sounds like you already have a protocol in mind, but in my experience a true max heart rate is best achieved during a set of medium-length intervals, like 3 X 1000 meters or similar. The rest interval should not be should be equal or less than the work interval. Of course, the effort level has to be at 11 on a scale of 1-10.

A 2K erg test should get to a very similar number, but anything much beyond 2K is suspect because although the effort may be 100 percent the role of pacing concerns, and the rising level of lactate accumulation, means that longer tests are not as likely to produce the highest possible beats per minute.
6 feet, 180 lbs. 52 years old, 2K PR 6:27 (forever ago) 7:25 (modern day, at altitude)

RowRinseRepeat
500m Poster
Posts: 58
Joined: September 2nd, 2018, 2:16 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by RowRinseRepeat » September 24th, 2018, 4:28 pm

Thanks Mark, not wedded to any particular method, just looking for good interval methods as I've read many people require several intervals in order to hit a max HR, so appreciate the advice.

So you would do 3 x 1000 intervals, and the two rest periods in between should not be longer than the length of the high intensity 1000 meter interval? And the HR max measure would be taken at the end of the 3rd 1000 meter interval, of course rowing at "11" on a scale of 1-10?

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Citroen » September 24th, 2018, 4:43 pm

Take a look at page 19 (onwards) in Eddie Fletcher's marathon guide: https://indoorsportservices.co.uk/train ... n/download

iant187
Paddler
Posts: 34
Joined: April 24th, 2018, 10:40 am

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by iant187 » September 24th, 2018, 5:07 pm

I think there was a method in the old Concept 2 training guide, where you progressively stepped up in Watt increments.
I'll see if I can find it.

User avatar
Mark E
2k Poster
Posts: 297
Joined: July 29th, 2018, 1:26 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Mark E » September 24th, 2018, 5:34 pm

RowRinseRepeat wrote:
September 24th, 2018, 4:28 pm
Thanks Mark, not wedded to any particular method, just looking for good interval methods as I've read many people require several intervals in order to hit a max HR, so appreciate the advice.

So you would do 3 x 1000 intervals, and the two rest periods in between should not be longer than the length of the high intensity 1000 meter interval? And the HR max measure would be taken at the end of the 3rd 1000 meter interval, of course rowing at "11" on a scale of 1-10?
That would do the trick for me.
6 feet, 180 lbs. 52 years old, 2K PR 6:27 (forever ago) 7:25 (modern day, at altitude)

User avatar
Remo
1k Poster
Posts: 144
Joined: October 17th, 2017, 7:21 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Remo » September 24th, 2018, 11:27 pm

I have found this method is pretty accurate using a interval of 3x4:00/3:00active rest :

"Find your exact maximum heart rate

Warm up thoroughly so you start sweating.
Do two intervals, each four minutes long. During the intervals you should be too short of breath to talk. Intersperse each interval with three minutes of active rest.
Start the third interval, but two minutes in, run as fast as you can until you're too exhausted to continue. Your HRmax will be the highest heart rate you reach. The heart will reach a plateau at which it cannot beat any faster, regardless of how much you increase the workload."
Ref: https://www.ntnu.edu/cerg/hrmax (about 2/3rds down the page).

Your max HR will vary a little day to day depending on your sleep, your warmup, recent workouts, cardiac drift, and other unquantifiable stuff.

As long as you have a good warmup, you will get a good reading HRMax reading from an all out 2k. I occasionally hit it on long, hard interval sets, or at the end of a hard 5k.
Stewart MH 63+ https://log.concept2.com/profile/4926
Started rowing in 1975.

jamesg
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4194
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
Location: Trentino Italy

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by jamesg » September 25th, 2018, 2:26 am

See https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_di_Conconi

The English version has less detail.

The test serves to identify the AT, not max HR, but no doubt this will be seen. By definition aerobic work is below AT, anaerobic above, so we don't need to know the Max HR to set HR bands, if we know our AT and the Rest HR.

This removes any uncertainty in calculation of AT from Max HR; max drops with age, as we know, but AT also depending on training, not necessarily.

To do the Conconi (or any other similar) test, we can use a C2 erg showing Watts. In HR theory the W/HR curve shows the AT threshold as an inflection point. We can then estimate the band levels in Watts as well as HR.

The aerobic bands would be say max 70, 85 and 100% of AT Watts or of AT HR Range.
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.

User avatar
Gammmmo
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: March 26th, 2016, 1:12 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Gammmmo » September 25th, 2018, 2:43 am

Some thoughts:

1. Don't overthink it
2. Stepped test like the Conconi one over ~10-12mins would be a good idea
3. Warm up well including some time at high intensities
4. Be mindful of ambient temperature, health and warming up too much going into the test - all can affect the "right" result
5. Ideally repeat another day under as many conditions being the same as possible
6. Be well rested going into the rest
Paul, 49M, 5'11" 83kg (sprint PBs HWT), ex biker now lifting
Deadlift=190kg, LP=1:15, 100m=15.7s, 1min=350m Image
Targets: 14s (100m), 355m+ 1min, 1:27(500m), 3:11(1K)

Erg on!

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by hjs » September 25th, 2018, 3:23 am

RowRinseRepeat wrote:
September 24th, 2018, 3:52 pm
Can anyone recommend a good method for measuring Max HR, especially with stepped intervals (a member in Sydney mentioned the Australian Institute of Sports stepped method, where a person is measured in 6 intervals and the Max is taken in the last interval).
Simple, row 10/15 minites pretty hard, you should start breathing hard, when you feel you are close to having to slow down, start sprinting for a last max burst.

User avatar
gregsmith01748
10k Poster
Posts: 1359
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Hopkinton, MA

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by gregsmith01748 » September 25th, 2018, 1:52 pm

Hi,

If you want to use the AIS protocol, here is a write up about my experience with it.

https://wordpress.com/post/quantifiedro ... .com/15829

I measured lactate when I did it, but that's optional. The HR I got with the test ended up about 5 bpm below the max that I've seen in other sessions. I have seen my highest HRs at the very end of long time trials like a 10K or 60'.
Greg
Age: 55 H: 182cm W: 90Kg
Image

RowRinseRepeat
500m Poster
Posts: 58
Joined: September 2nd, 2018, 2:16 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by RowRinseRepeat » September 25th, 2018, 3:12 pm

Thank you Remo, Mark, gregsmith01748, hjs, Gammmmo, jamesg, iant187 and Citroen - these were all great, easy to follow suggestions. I like a stepped method because in my experience it takes time to get to a max HR.

Going to wait a bit before do a test to give ourselves time to heal from 2 1/2 weeks of bad form where we were pulling too hard with arms which caused both of us develop a bit of a shoulder/upper arm inflammation in one arm. In the meantime when we row we'll be careful not to pull too hard and keep it at a smooth 65-70% and maybe dial back to rowing every other day. The toughest part is knowing how long to rest from rowing to give the shoulder time to heal. Tendons always seem to take longer to adjust to new forces than muscle.

Allan Olesen
5k Poster
Posts: 548
Joined: April 27th, 2018, 6:40 am

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Allan Olesen » September 25th, 2018, 3:37 pm

As written earlier in the thread, there are better ways than max HR if one wants to accurately determine one's training zones.

So I wonder why so many of you have this desire to know your max HR. How does it benefit you?

RowRinseRepeat
500m Poster
Posts: 58
Joined: September 2nd, 2018, 2:16 pm

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by RowRinseRepeat » September 25th, 2018, 3:40 pm

Allan what are the better ways? I'm interested in it for purposes of knowing best training zones for better fitness and training.

Allan Olesen
5k Poster
Posts: 548
Joined: April 27th, 2018, 6:40 am

Re: Good Method for Measuring Max HR?

Post by Allan Olesen » September 25th, 2018, 5:09 pm

Zones based on lactate threshold.

I may be too influenced by Joe Friel, but I consider zones based on max HR a crude instrument from old days.

When you train in the upper zones, the target is often to train some aspect of your lactate handling. To get the correct effect of this training, you have to hit some rather narrow HR ranges relative to your lactate threshold.

So it seems logical to go the direct way and place the zones relatively to your lactate threshold instead of going the indirect way and place them relatively to your max. heart rate.

Post Reply