Rowing for weight loss or weight control? Start here.
-
hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Post
by hjs » April 4th, 2017, 2:00 am
TXSmokey wrote:When I first bought my rower I used it for a couple of weeks then I got busy at work and haven't touched it since. My plan at the time was to keep the pace I needed to pass and build up the distance. In two weeks I got up to 1250 m at a 2:10 pace, which makes me feel like I can do it. I'm not too sure how hard the last 750 m will be though. As far as running goes, it is more of a run/walk with a lot of time to pass. That is why I said the run was easier.
Motivation sounds very low... Endurancetraining needs enough time. 1250 meters is 5 min. Thats nothing, 20 min sessions are the very minimum. Do this at least 3 times a week.
Again, your health is not good. The test should be very easy to do for an average man, a good rower would hardly breath....
-
sdr2017
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 67
- Joined: February 26th, 2017, 6:29 pm
Post
by sdr2017 » April 4th, 2017, 8:26 am
I have never had to do a fitness test for work, so it is a surprising concept for me. I looked around the web and found this interesting site for Texas Troopers:
http://www.dps.texas.gov/trainingAcadem ... ements.htm
It is fun to play with their calculator. I note that the times and rankings are MUCH slower than what one might expect browsing the Concept 2 rankings. All of you people here are seriously over-achievers.
To the original poster, I am also new to rowing and followed suggestions to start the Pete's Beginner's plan. I am a few weeks in and it is going well I suspect 12 weeks in would see you passing the qualifications requirement if you are starting from a reasonable base.
Most of the people you find on this forum are in very good shape, so their standards may not translate well to my fitness level or yours. Good luck with your training.
1 min: 302 M; 500M 1:40.9; 1K 3:42.0; 2K 7:51.6; 5K 20:46; 10K 42:45.6; 30 min: 7147M
Scott
59 Yrs, 5' 7" / 177 lbs (170 cm/80 kg)
-
bisqeet
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: July 20th, 2015, 3:17 am
- Location: Bavaria, Germany
Post
by bisqeet » April 4th, 2017, 8:56 am
well - cant see me getting any faster than the required 9:38 for a 2k...
funnily if i was 10 years older it would only get me 10s more..20 years younger would still have me targeting a 9:20...
seems oddly non linear
- still think its a good idea.
our standing joke in green was at the expense of the airforce (back home for tea and medals).
they're annual test consisted of a BMI calculation.
we had to do other silly things - especially if i wanted to keep airborne / diver status (it was extra money and i liked collecting badges)
in retrospect i'm not sure which was the better
Dean
2020 Season: 196cm / 96kg : M51
Training Log - ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ -
Blog
~seven days without rowing makes one weak~
-
TXSmokey
- Paddler
- Posts: 9
- Joined: March 30th, 2017, 4:44 pm
Post
by TXSmokey » April 4th, 2017, 2:52 pm
sdr2017 wrote:I have never had to do a fitness test for work, so it is a surprising concept for me. I looked around the web and found this interesting site for Texas Troopers:
http://www.dps.texas.gov/trainingAcadem ... ements.htm
It is fun to play with their calculator. I note that the times and rankings are MUCH slower than what one might expect browsing the Concept 2 rankings. All of you people here are seriously over-achievers.
To the original poster, I am also new to rowing and followed suggestions to start the Pete's Beginner's plan. I am a few weeks in and it is going well I suspect 12 weeks in would see you passing the qualifications requirement if you are starting from a reasonable base.
Most of the people you find on this forum are in very good shape, so their standards may not translate well to my fitness level or yours. Good luck with your training.
My job uses the same standard as the Texas DPS site.
-
Rowan McSheen
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 486
- Joined: December 13th, 2014, 6:33 pm
- Location: Cornwall, UK
Post
by Rowan McSheen » April 4th, 2017, 5:50 pm
sdr2017 wrote: Most of the people you find on this forum are in very good shape, so their standards may not translate well to my fitness level or yours. Good luck with your training.
Good thought. My erg times are distinctly mediocre to average compared to those seen on this forum. Ditto my running times in races. But that's in the context of cohorts of people who by definition are considerably fitter than the bulk of the population, which is some consolation. By way of example, to join the forces my son had to do a fitness test of a 1.5 mile run in 11 mins 9 seconds or better, which I can just about do. But he was 21 and I'm 56
Stu 5' 9" 165 lb/75 kg (give or take a couple) born 1960
-
sdr2017
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 67
- Joined: February 26th, 2017, 6:29 pm
Post
by sdr2017 » April 4th, 2017, 9:00 pm
Fun with the Texas Trooper Test!
I played with the Texas Trooper website to identify the equation. They use a simple linear equation: target speed (sec) = –06806 X (weight-lb) + 713.47
This equation leads to some ludicrous targets. If you weight 1048 lb, your target time is 0 sec! Go team!
At 555 lb, your target time is less than the world record time of 5:36!
If you weigh 85 lb (like my mother) your target is just under 11 min.
It is a crazy standard. It might make more sense if they did it by height, even if it is just a simple linear fit. Unless your added weight is all muscle, this standard gets progressively harder for large people. It is probably a good fit over some narrow range, but they are clearly not paying attention to extrapolating beyond common weights.
1 min: 302 M; 500M 1:40.9; 1K 3:42.0; 2K 7:51.6; 5K 20:46; 10K 42:45.6; 30 min: 7147M
Scott
59 Yrs, 5' 7" / 177 lbs (170 cm/80 kg)
-
jamesg
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4195
- Joined: March 18th, 2006, 3:44 am
- Location: Trentino Italy
Post
by jamesg » April 5th, 2017, 5:02 am
They need to weed out the overweight unfit, and 12 weeks of 5 k a day will get anyone out of that bracket, easily. The same stuff as from day-after would keep them out too, as well as out of cardiac risk zones.
08-1940, 183cm, 83kg.
2024: stroke 5.5W-min@20-21. ½k 190W, 1k 145W, 2k 120W. Using Wods 4-5days/week. Fading fast.
-
Ombrax
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: April 20th, 2013, 2:05 am
- Location: St Louis, MO, USA
Post
by Ombrax » April 5th, 2017, 10:19 pm
TXSmokey wrote: In two weeks I got up to 1250 m at a 2:10 pace, which makes me feel like I can do it. I'm not too sure how hard the last 750 m will be though. As far as running goes, it is more of a run/walk with a lot of time to pass. That is why I said the run was easier.
If you're pushing yourself, the last 500m are always the hardest.
Instead of rowing at a 2:10 pace and building up distance until I got to 2k, I would row 2k (or a bit more) and gradually work at a faster and faster pace in successive workouts until I got down to the goal.
The good thing about not being in very good shape is that in the beginning you tend to improve quite rapidly. (unless you try to do too much too quickly, and injure yourself because your body hasn't had a chance to acclimate to the work)
-
jimmy1
- Paddler
- Posts: 20
- Joined: October 25th, 2016, 12:40 pm
Post
by jimmy1 » April 10th, 2017, 1:32 pm
sdr2017 wrote:I suspect 12 weeks in would see you passing the qualifications requirement if you are starting from a reasonable base.
If starting from a reasonable fitness base (I.e., reasonable for a state trooper - one going on tax dollars with the expectation to catch criminals) one should be *fit enough* to pass this test on day one. Easily fit enough imo. The problem is the technical side.... that is a trooper ought to be fit enough to juggle balls but it does require a basic technique set that isn't job applicable.
Still with just a basic grasp of the technical side from YouTube or a knowledgeable instructor, these times seem quite reasonable for law enforcement personnel.
-
TXSmokey
- Paddler
- Posts: 9
- Joined: March 30th, 2017, 4:44 pm
Post
by TXSmokey » May 3rd, 2017, 6:52 pm
I was able to pass the test today after only 4 weeks of practice. That includes a week off in the middle due to a kidney stone. Not as difficult as I had thought. Thanks for the advice.
-
calalli
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 86
- Joined: March 17th, 2017, 1:12 pm
- Location: Akron OH
Post
by calalli » May 3rd, 2017, 8:47 pm
Congratulations! I was wondering just today how things worked out for you. Are you going to keep going with the erg?
cal - age 55 ht 5'10" wt 205 lbs
-
TXSmokey
- Paddler
- Posts: 9
- Joined: March 30th, 2017, 4:44 pm
Post
by TXSmokey » May 3rd, 2017, 10:47 pm
I plan to keep rowing, but I'm going to mix some resistance training in with it.
-
Carl Watts
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
- Location: NEW ZEALAND
Post
by Carl Watts » May 4th, 2017, 1:40 am
I would take the rower test for sure, thats a slow time for anyone who has done even a bit of training on the erg.
The police PAT test over here is a 2.4Km run or 6 times round the track in under 12 min 15 seconds for your age, 34 non stop military press-ups and jump height test and a grip strength test and you also have to be able to tread water for 5 minutes and swim 50m and free dive for a weight.
I would have taken any form of rowing test as opposed to that !!!
-
sdr2017
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 67
- Joined: February 26th, 2017, 6:29 pm
Post
by sdr2017 » May 11th, 2017, 9:55 pm
TXSmokey,
Congratulations on passing the test!
From my own experience, I would guess that passing the kidney stone hurt more than passing the erg test.
Scott
1 min: 302 M; 500M 1:40.9; 1K 3:42.0; 2K 7:51.6; 5K 20:46; 10K 42:45.6; 30 min: 7147M
Scott
59 Yrs, 5' 7" / 177 lbs (170 cm/80 kg)
-
TXSmokey
- Paddler
- Posts: 9
- Joined: March 30th, 2017, 4:44 pm
Post
by TXSmokey » May 14th, 2017, 1:27 pm
Thanks sdr2017. Yes, the kidney stone was a lot worse than the erg test!