Ps ctc Dirk in the house..
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
OK Shawn - go for it! Could defo be top 3 on this one.hjs wrote:Ps ctc Dirk in the house..
Cerainly don,t think you will/should alter your training, you are a pure strenghtbased athlete, aerobic training does go well with this. Improving your aerobic fitness will no doubt lower the other side of the spectrum. Toprowers seldom have good 500/1k scores, because 2k is much more aerobicly based plus otw weight is important, getting stronger will build muscle, in a boat not direct a plus.Shawn Baker wrote: Henry- a few points of discussion
- believe me I am reminded of the aerobic component of a 1k everyday![]()
Whether or not my training scheme is appropriate is fairly irrelevant to me as 1: my desire to do the aerobic work that many would recommend (even if I had the extra time) is pretty close to zero-2- the way I am training now allows me to get both stronger and hit rowing PRs-granted to this point they have been low pull, 1 min and 500m- but I'd say almost no one would recommend doing a 500m time trial every day (albeit most were rate restricted)- I'd say most would say the intense work every day leads to overtraining, burnout or injury- that has not been my experience thus far as I was able to add over 100 watts to my low pull, take 2 seconds off my already decent 500 time and add about 10 m to my 1 min row all in the space of about 3 months- possibly the fact that my diet tends to favor higher fat oxidation and thus less oxidative stress (at least that is what some believe
)- also a daily 1k at a fairly intense effort I would argue is building aerobic capacity- also I agree 3secs is not enough and I will generally be looking at 4 secs this 1k training cycle
Cheers Paul, see it a bit differentpaul45 wrote:
Very strong 300 there Henry.