Feedback for a photo
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Feedback for a photo
Hi my name is Nick and I want to start rowing for a club in the future. I'm 37 years old and have started using an indoor rower to get fit enough to join a club . I'm going to post this picture and hope that anyone can tell me if it's any good . I've got the resistance just above 4. I have done 2000 meters on resistance 5 at 7:00.
- Attachments
-
- IMAG0077_1_1.jpg (74.89 KiB) Viewed 7490 times
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8075
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Feedback for a photo
Was that a warm-up? Or a serious row?
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Re: Feedback for a photo
I had done a 2000 in 7:85 prior to doing that 4000 in the picture . So yes it was serious. I take it. It's slow ?? Remember I'm new to rowing.
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Feedback for a photo
Search for dragfactor (re level)CannonFodder wrote:I had done a 2000 in 7:85 prior to doing that 4000 in the picture . So yes it was serious. I take it. It's slow ?? Remember I'm new to rowing.
Look at the concept2 rankings to give you an idea what is good.
Your rating 35 (strokes per minute) is very high for the given pace. This points to an inefficient technique, you don,t use a full stroke.
Erging depends a lot on seize, how tall are you? Strong rowers are often tall 1.9/200 meters.
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Re: Feedback for a photo
Oh? That's very interesting as I'm trying my best to get my technique right, but did think that I wasn't using a full stroke . I'm over 5f 7 inches tall. . I use resistance 4. On a concept 11 rower . I'll check concept 11 ratings out 

-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Re: Feedback for a photo
Oh boy!!! Just checked the rankings out for concept 11 . Wow I've got some work to do!! I have to get my Technique sorted 

- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Feedback for a photo
Yep, your height you can,t change. Look on youtube for some examples.CannonFodder wrote:Oh boy!!! Just checked the rankings out for concept 11 . Wow I've got some work to do!! I have to get my Technique sorted
Re: Feedback for a photo
Don't ignore Henri's advice to check up on drag factor. The damper setting is not the full story and it is not really a resistance in the usual sense. Check out the C2 home website. It has an enormous amount of information, including a page about the damper lever (Damper setting 101?). It takes a little surfing around on the site to get the full benefit of it, but it is worth doing. There is a lot there about technique, including a section about common errors and correcting them.CannonFodder wrote:Oh boy!!! Just checked the rankings out for concept 11 . Wow I've got some work to do!! I have to get my Technique sorted
You reported a 2k time of 7:85, so I assume that it was a typo. If the 7 is correct, it could be OK. 7:00 is not a bad time for a short 37 year old man. However, 7:59 would be very slow. You didn't report your weight. At 5'7" you should be in the lightweight bracket (165# or less), otherwise there is a weight issue unless you are bulked up a lot from weight lifting.
Bob S.
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Re: Feedback for a photo
I have done a 2000 meter at 7 :00. But never done it since. The 7:85 wasn't a typo. I've only been doing rowing for about 5 months now. So very new to it all.
My body build is athletic. And I'm a very dedicated person and I'm aiming to race for a club in the future. Plus I would never ever lie about any times I've done.
My body build is athletic. And I'm a very dedicated person and I'm aiming to race for a club in the future. Plus I would never ever lie about any times I've done.

- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8075
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Feedback for a photo
It must be a typo unless there are more than 60 seconds in a minute in your Universe.CannonFodder wrote:The 7:85 wasn't a typo.
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 7
- Joined: April 12th, 2015, 9:14 am
Re: Feedback for a photo
Omg !! That was meant to be 7:58 !!!! So so sorry!!!
Re: Feedback for a photo
Don't sweat it. Been there; done that. Often enough that I finally resorted to very careful proofing, especially numbers. Even so, an occasional screwup still sneaks in.CannonFodder wrote:Omg !! That was meant to be 7:58 !!!! So so sorry!!!
Bob S.