Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 28th, 2011, 1:54 pm

nharrigan wrote:Ranger- What kind of on the water training are you doing?
Is that lake long enough to row for 30 minutes without turning?
Sure.

I would say the lake is about 500 miles, north to south, perhaps 1000 miles around the perimeter.

That's a pretty nice row, no?

Image

If you don't know Lake Michigan, you should check it out.

Pretty nice body of water.

Wikipedia tells us that it is about the size of West Virginia.

:D :D

:o :shock:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Michigan

Have you ever heard of Chicago?

Or Milwaukee?

The five million people in Chicago and Milwaukee live on the shores of Lake Michigan.

The Mackinac bridge is also one of the wonders of the world, an engineering feat that fascinated scientists for decades, until it was finally accomplished.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackinac_Bridge

ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 28th, 2011, 2:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Citroen » June 28th, 2011, 2:04 pm

ranger wrote: I would say the lake is about 500 miles, north to south, perhaps 1000 miles around the perimeter.
So using applied Rangermath, in that case it has zero width. You could have looked it up in that WikiPedia entry you cite. Lake Michigan: Max. length: 307 mi (494 km), Max. width 118 mi (190 km).

TWAT.

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Citroen » June 28th, 2011, 2:10 pm

ranger wrote: The bridge at Mackinaw is also one of the wonder of the world, an engineering feat that fascinated scientists for decades, until it was finally accomplished.
Hardly a wonder. It's not even in the middle of the list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lo ... idge_spans

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by johnlvs2run » June 28th, 2011, 2:28 pm

Lake Michigan has an average length of 306 miles, and has a shoreline of 1,640 miles around including the islands.

There's a book called "A 1000 Mile Walk on the Beach", so there must be a 1000 mile route.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by NavigationHazard » June 28th, 2011, 2:43 pm

Give me an effin break. On those occasions where he rows on the big lake it's in Europe Bay. It's visible on the Google link I posted earlier. As for whether you can row for 30 minutes there without turning, of course you can. If you row slowly enough.

Forgot to add. It tales an hour to go round Europe Bay by rangercycle, so it must be 20 miles across.
67 MH 6' 6"

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by johnlvs2run » June 28th, 2011, 2:51 pm

ranger wrote:A 6:29.7 2K @ 12 spm, without even preparing for it, when I was 55.
Rich,

I am extremely impressed. Do you happen to have a video of this feat?
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by lancs » June 28th, 2011, 3:46 pm

ranger wrote:
Citroen wrote:
ranger wrote:The next demonstration will be a FM @ 1:48 (or faster).
But since you can't do 5000m @ 1:48 then how will you get to 42,195m at a pace you can't sustain?
Dougie--

I do 1:44-1:48 @ 24 spm with a HR of 155 bpm.

AT for me is 180 bpm.

A 5K is AT.
This garbled answer still doesn't explain your complete and utter absolute inability to get past 5k at your intended FM pace.

I'm genuinely interested in hearing your thoughts on why this may be.

Why can't you now row a 5k quicker than 18 minutes?

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 28th, 2011, 4:17 pm

johnlvs2run wrote:
ranger wrote:A 6:29.7 2K @ 12 spm, without even preparing for it, when I was 55.
Rich,

I am extremely impressed. Do you happen to have a video of this feat?
No video, but plenty of witnesses.

Baltimore Burn, 2006.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 28th, 2011, 4:20 pm

Navigation Hazard wrote:On those occasions where he rows on the big lake it's in Europe Bay
Nope.

When the wind is calm, or from the south, I can row from Garrett Bay to Newport Bay, quite a distance.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by johnlvs2run » June 28th, 2011, 4:24 pm

ranger wrote:
johnlvs2run wrote:
ranger wrote:A 6:29.7 2K @ 12 spm, without even preparing for it, when I was 55.
Rich,

I am extremely impressed. Do you happen to have a video of this feat?
No video, but plenty of witnesses.

Baltimore Burn, 2006.

ranger
That is awesome.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

whp4
6k Poster
Posts: 665
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:09 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by whp4 » June 28th, 2011, 4:42 pm

ranger wrote:
johnlvs2run wrote:
ranger wrote:A 6:29.7 2K @ 12 spm, without even preparing for it, when I was 55.
Rich,

I am extremely impressed. Do you happen to have a video of this feat?
No video, but plenty of witnesses.

Baltimore Burn, 2006.

ranger
You didn't row at 12 spm :roll: You don't have any witnesses who will attest to the piece being done at 12 SPI, either.

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by lancs » June 28th, 2011, 4:50 pm

ranger wrote:
Citroen wrote:
ranger wrote:The next demonstration will be a FM @ 1:48 (or faster).
But since you can't do 5000m @ 1:48 then how will you get to 42,195m at a pace you can't sustain?
Dougie--

I do 1:44-1:48 @ 24 spm with a HR of 155 bpm.

AT for me is 180 bpm.

A 5K is AT.

Hi Prof. My question earlier may have got lost within other replies so I'm repeating it.

Why can't you now row a 5k quicker than 18 minutes?

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » June 28th, 2011, 4:52 pm

BTW, if your fitness is sky high, that is, if you row OTErg for 20K a day,, and in this rowing, bust ass amazingly, the only thing that matters when you row OTW is how far you move the boat on each stroke--that is, MPS, SPI, etc.

I now do about 7.5 SPI OTW.

I am working toward 8 SPI.

Watch out!

That's as good as anyone.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 28th, 2011, 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Fred
500m Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: March 24th, 2011, 1:04 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Fred » June 28th, 2011, 4:52 pm

lancs wrote:Why can't you now row a 5k quicker than 18 minutes?
Rich will never answer that question when phrased in that manner :D

Did X back in Y, much better than that now.
Not interested in a 18 min 5k, his goal is Z
Racing your training is ruinous

but never a straight answer :D

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by NavigationHazard » June 28th, 2011, 5:36 pm

ranger wrote:
Navigation Hazard wrote:On those occasions where he rows on the big lake it's in Europe Bay
Nope.

When the wind is calm, or from the south, I can row from Garrett Bay to Newport Bay, quite a distance.

ranger
Fraud. You can row on the Panama Canal too, when the wind is calm or from the south and you're in full Glendower mode.* So can I, and so can any man. Not to mention the Volga estuary, Derwent Water, Eyre Lake (in season) and the moat around Angkor Wat. But you don't row from Garrett bay to Newport Bay. And you haven't. And you won't.

Image

That's at least a 25k round trip. Perhaps you meant to say that you bicycle the distance, at 20 mph, without pedals, dressed as Walt Whitman, while playing the Haydn "drum roll" symphony on a concertina and composing sestinas in classical Aramaic.

Fraud.


* Henry IV Part 1 Act 3 scene 1, 52-58.
67 MH 6' 6"

Locked