General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 9:03 am
citroen wrote:You can't measure SPI in a boat
Agreed.
But the artificial guesstimate, using watts on the erg for scalar values, is useful, nonetheless.
Just convert OTW paces to erg watts and divide by the stroke rate.
Then hold the result steady at all rates and paces.
For instance, at 8 SPI OTW, 2:00 @ 25 spm becomes 1:47 @ 35 spm, if you hold your technique steady.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Post
by Citroen » June 18th, 2011, 11:06 am
ranger wrote:citroen wrote:You can't measure SPI in a boat
Agreed.
First truth from Ranger all week.
So stop asking about SPI in a boat.
ranger wrote:
Just convert OTW paces to erg watts and divide by the stroke rate.
Then hold the result steady at all rates and paces.
Cretin. There's too many variables you're ignoring, but don't let that get in the way of Rangermath and Rangerphysics.
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 11:39 am
I was doing some nice 1:56 @ 30 spm OTW today on the big lake.
I need to try some 1Ks to see if I can hold that 7.5 SPI @ 30 spm steady for 116 strokes.
30 spm is a _very_ controlled rate for a 1K.
At my best, I think I'll rate 36 spm OTW for 1K.
36 spm @ 7.5 SPI is 1:48 pace.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
JimmyL
- Paddler
- Posts: 42
- Joined: May 14th, 2011, 3:25 pm
Post
by JimmyL » June 18th, 2011, 1:27 pm
ranger wrote:I was doing some nice 1:56 @ 30 spm OTW today on the big lake.
I need to try some 1Ks to see if I can hold that 7.5 SPI @ 30 spm steady for 116 strokes.
30 spm is a _very_ controlled rate for a 1K.
At my best, I think I'll rate 36 spm OTW for 1K.
36 spm @ 7.5 SPI is 1:48 pace.
ranger
I'm sorry if I don't understand your maths here but didn't you say earlier that you'd do a HM at 1:42?
so why can you only do a 1:48 1k?
J16, 72kg.
2k 7:08.6
2k OTW 8:01.9
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 1:53 pm
JimmyL wrote:
I'm sorry if I don't understand your maths here but didn't you say earlier that you'd do a HM at 1:42?
so why can you only do a 1:48 1k?
I didn't say I couldn't.
I haven't tried.
I think I'll start with a lot of 1Ks, 1:56 @ 30 spm.
Then, I'll slow raise the rate.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 2:02 pm
At 20 seconds per 500m over erg times, 1:56 @ 30 spm is the equivalent of 1:36 @ 30 spm (13.3 SPI) OTErg.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 2:04 pm
BTW, OTW today, I ran my HR over 160 bpm for most of the 10K.
That's pretty robust training for a 60s veteran, especially after 12K OTErg.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
Bob S.
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm
Post
by Bob S. » June 18th, 2011, 2:13 pm
JimmyL wrote:
I'm sorry if I don't understand your maths here but didn't you say earlier that you'd do a HM at 1:42?
so why can you only do a 1:48 1k?
Jimmy,
Note that the HM is for OTE and the 1k is for OTW (in a single). They are not at all comparable. The math of the OTE monitor is based on one of the fours, any one of which is a hell of a lot faster than a single (except for the first few meters).
Bob S.
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 2:17 pm
BTW, what is the best 60s OTW 1K to date?
Does anyone know?
If the 60s HOCR guys can do 2:00 pace for 5K, they should be able to do 1:50 pace for 1K.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
JimmyL
- Paddler
- Posts: 42
- Joined: May 14th, 2011, 3:25 pm
Post
by JimmyL » June 18th, 2011, 2:23 pm
Bob S. wrote:JimmyL wrote:
I'm sorry if I don't understand your maths here but didn't you say earlier that you'd do a HM at 1:42?
so why can you only do a 1:48 1k?
Jimmy,
Note that the HM is for OTE and the 1k is for OTW (in a single). They are not at all comparable. The math of the OTE monitor is based on one of the fours, any one of which is a hell of a lot faster than a single (except for the first few meters).
Bob S.
Ah I see, so he's talking about real times with the 1K?
I
J16, 72kg.
2k 7:08.6
2k OTW 8:01.9
-
Bob S.
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm
Post
by Bob S. » June 18th, 2011, 2:45 pm
JimmyL wrote:
Ah I see, so he's talking about real times with the 1K?
I
I can't say that the times are any more real than any of the rest of the stuff that he posts. I was just pointing out that, in this case, he was not making contradictory claims. Bogus, possibly, but not contradictory.
Bob S.
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 3:24 pm
Citroen wrote:
Cretin.
No.
Actually, Dougie, the cretins are those like you, who pull 7 SPI, just half a good stroke, and wouldn't know why if it bit you on the ass.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
ranger
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 11629
- Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm
Post
by ranger » June 18th, 2011, 3:28 pm
Bob S. wrote:Bogus, possibly
You mean my claim that I can probably pull 116 strokes at 30 spm OTW?
Yikes.
I'll be pretty darn surprised if, in the end, I don't pull 5K @ 30 spm OTW.
That 550 strokes.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
JimmyL
- Paddler
- Posts: 42
- Joined: May 14th, 2011, 3:25 pm
Post
by JimmyL » June 18th, 2011, 4:18 pm
ranger wrote:Bob S. wrote:Bogus, possibly
You mean my claim that I can probably pull 116 strokes at 30 spm OTW?
Yikes.
I'll be pretty darn surprised if, in the end, I don't pull 5K @ 30 spm OTW.
That 550 strokes.
ranger
just pulling 116 strokes at rate 30 means nothing.
shooting up the slide and going slow in the water can give you a rate of 30, yet no power.
J16, 72kg.
2k 7:08.6
2k OTW 8:01.9
-
Bob S.
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm
Post
by Bob S. » June 18th, 2011, 4:38 pm
JimmyL wrote:ranger wrote:Bob S. wrote:Bogus, possibly
You mean my claim that I can probably pull 116 strokes at 30 spm OTW?
Yikes.
I'll be pretty darn surprised if, in the end, I don't pull 5K @ 30 spm OTW.
That 550 strokes.
ranger
just pulling 116 strokes at rate 30 means nothing.
shooting up the slide and going slow in the water can give you a rate of 30, yet no power.
Typical Cureton
non sequitur. We had been discussing an OTE HM and an OTW 1k and he pops up with a completely different issue.
Bob S.