ranger wrote:Read the forum, numb-nuts.bellboy wrote:Who are Alexc25 and lightweight Management? Are you mucking around with quotes again?
ranger
Numb-nuts? Moi? It wasn't me that got banned for a week for missatributing quotes now was it?
ranger wrote:Read the forum, numb-nuts.bellboy wrote:Who are Alexc25 and lightweight Management? Are you mucking around with quotes again?
ranger
By what objective means are you measuring this 'good progress'?ranger wrote:it is not at all easy to post a FM @ 1:44 (the Open hwt FM WR).
<snip>
I am making good progress on it.
In standard ways.lancs wrote:By what objective means are you measuring this 'good progress'?ranger wrote:it is not at all easy to post a FM @ 1:44 (the Open hwt FM WR).
<snip>
I am making good progress on it.
My progress has been technical.lancs wrote:By what objective means are you measuring this 'good progress'?ranger wrote:it is not at all easy to post a FM @ 1:44 (the Open hwt FM WR).
<snip>
I am making good progress on it.
Perfect!mikvan52 wrote:RIch:
Here's something for you to shoot for:
A long time from now.... you should be 'rowing well' by then...
First US Head Race Nationals to be held in 2012
While most go about it in the opposite way (and therefore end up frustrated failures), if you want to row to the limits of your potential, there is only one best way to train for rowing.lancs wrote:By what objective means are you measuring this 'good progress'?ranger wrote:it is not at all easy to post a FM @ 1:44 (the Open hwt FM WR).
<snip>
I am making good progress on it.
Sure they do.macroth wrote:Three posts to answer one question, none of which actually do so
Ah. I see. This is much clearer now. All your objective evidence is still in the future, not yet done.ranger wrote:In standard ways.lancs wrote:By what objective means are you measuring this 'good progress'?
My first race will be a FM.
Then I will race the other distances, from the top down: HM, 60min, 10K, 30min, 6K, 5K.
Then I will sharpen with standard interval workouts: 4 x 2K, 4 x 1K, 8 x 500m, etc., and do sprint trials: 1K, 500m.
Then I will race.
And yet you, the greatest erger of our lifetime, could row nowhere near this pace for a FM (and I mean as a 60's hwt, ie right now, not 8 years ago)ranger wrote:the 60s hwt FM WR is 1:54 pace.
<snip>
Wretched stuff.
We'll soon see.lancs wrote:And yet you, the greatest erger of our lifetime, could row nowhere near this pace for a FM (and I mean as a 60's hwt, ie right now, not 8 years ago)ranger wrote:the 60s hwt FM WR is 1:54 pace.
<snip>
Wretched stuff.
A bit odd to call this 'wretched stuff'?