Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 10:40 am

snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:At 55, Mike pulled 6:45, fully prepared.

I pulled 6:29.7, unprepared and still struggling with technique,
Mike was a walkabout lwt. You were fat.

Your technique was fit for purpose.

etc. etc.
Fat is irrelevant in erging.

It doesn't make you go faster.

It doesn't make you go slower.

It just hangs there.

My heavyweight and lightweight pbs OTErg are the same: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt).

Mike and I have the same non-fat body mass.

Mike is taller than I am.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Fred
500m Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: March 24th, 2011, 1:04 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Fred » April 29th, 2011, 10:52 am

ranger wrote:
snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:At 55, Mike pulled 6:45, fully prepared.
I pulled 6:29.7, unprepared and still struggling with technique,
Mike was a walkabout lwt. You were fat.
Your technique was fit for purpose.
etc. etc.
Fat is irrelevant in erging.
It doesn't make you go faster.
It doesn't make you go slower.
Dishonest post Rich, You cant compare your HW to Mikes LW times, there is a reason there are two weight classes. Fat may not make you go faster, but loosing said fat will definitely cause you to go slower (as was demonstrated by you at BIRC this year.

You are being dishonest. You cant simultaneously claim that weight management is what caused you to do so poorly, and that weight is irrelevant.

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Bob S. » April 29th, 2011, 11:03 am

Fred wrote: You cant simultaneously claim that weight management is what caused you to do so poorly, and that weight is irrelevant.
You miss the point, Fred. He can claim any thing he pleases. Just because some claims might be contradictory is no reason that he can't make them.

Don't try to mess up this thread with logic.

Bob S.

User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by mikvan52 » April 29th, 2011, 11:15 am

Let's take the "top dog" element out of this discussion.
I have said many times that Rich has a faster record than me at 2k on the erg. Why cover old ground?

I would love to face ranger at a venue where weigh-in guidelines are strictly adhered to...
Why is it that he doesn't go to Boston anymore? :shock: :? :P

Guess I have to wait 2 more years until we're both in the same age group. Yawn....

Rich has questioned my own commitment to racing...
Answer: I care about racing on the water and do frequently.

This year, I'm going to give my old bod' a rest in anticipation for a big -6-0- coming up in 15 months. I will still race at 5k OTW. Old guys take note... It hard on you to keep hitting it hard year after year.

Will we see ranger out there OTW? I sincerely doubt it. Not with his brand of patented dolphin on a trampoline macho-stroke... :wink:
TSO's belief that concentrating exclusively on the erg makes you fast on the water is so dead wrong as to be absurd....
Wonder why he won't get some good coaching advice somewhere?.... Pig-headed, I guess.
3 Crash-B hammers
American 60's Lwt. 2k record (6:49) •• set WRs for 60' & FM •• ~ now surpassed
repeat combined Masters Lwt & Hwt 1x National Champion E & F class
62 yrs, 160 lbs, 6' ...

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 11:35 am

mikvan52 wrote:Pig-headed, I guess
Yea.

Ya got that one right.

I guess I've been a Wolverine too long.

:oops: :oops:

_Autodidact_ is a high-falutin' word for the disease.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 11:42 am

mikvan52 wrote:TSO's belief that concentrating exclusively on the erg makes you fast on the water is so dead wrong as to be absurd....
Sure, I concentrate exclusively OTErg when there is ice on the water.

Don't you?

In the summer months, I will row as much OTW as I do OTErg, hopefully 20K a day of each.

Sure, the erg can help you OTW.

If it didn't, no OTW rowers would use it.

But, glory be, it is now used universally.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 29th, 2011, 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 11:46 am

mikvan52 wrote:This year, I'm going to give my old bod' a rest in anticipation for a big -6-0- coming up in 15 months.Old guys take note... It hard on you to keep hitting it hard year after year.
Yes, I agree.

It _is_ hard on you.

Then again, at this age, any time you take off undermines fitness (aerobic capacity, strength, quickeness, etc.) that is hard to get back, probably impossible to get back.

It is gone, permanently.

One step forward, two steps back.

My strategy is to keep moving when I get injured, tired, sick, or whatever.

I try to never miss a day.

If I have injured some body part, I try to exercise everything else until I get the injured part back.

I cross-train--swim, bike, step, skip, run, etc.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Fred
500m Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: March 24th, 2011, 1:04 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Fred » April 29th, 2011, 12:19 pm

Bob S. wrote:
Fred wrote: You cant simultaneously claim that weight management is what caused you to do so poorly, and that weight is irrelevant.
You miss the point, Fred. He can claim any thing he pleases. Just because some claims might be contradictory is no reason that he can't make them.
Rich: what are your views on honesty?

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Bob S. » April 29th, 2011, 1:19 pm

mikvan52 wrote:
Guess I have to wait 2 more years until we're both in the same age group. Yawn....
You might be in the same C2 age group by then, but you will never be in the same range group as defined by TSO.

Bob S.

ben990
1k Poster
Posts: 123
Joined: January 7th, 2011, 9:00 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ben990 » April 29th, 2011, 2:09 pm

Hey, I tried to do a fast 5K during my lunch break, and I went out a little too fast and I had to take a couple of breaks around 3.5k and 4.1k. You could say I pulled a "ranger".

Don't worry though, I am not going to "Cureton" my overall time though with if's and when's.
Rich Cureton M 60 hwt 5'11" 180 lbs. 7:02.3 (lwt) 2K

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 2:39 pm

ben990 wrote:Hey, I tried to do a fast 5K during my lunch break, and I went out a little too fast and I had to take a couple of breaks around 3.5k and 4.1k. You could say I pulled a "ranger".

Don't worry though, I am not going to "Cureton" my overall time though with if's and when's.
My 5K pb is 1:43/17:10, done when I was 52.

Sure, I'll be racing 5Ks again, but probably not for a couple of months.

Now that I am 60, my target is 1:39/16:30.

Can you "Cureton" a 17:10 at 52?

Or perhaps up-stage my attempt to "Cureton" a 16:30 at 60?

My goal now is 60min at 1:43.

29 spm

11 SPI

10 MPS

3-to-1 ratio

105 df.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 29th, 2011, 2:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 2:43 pm

Bob S. wrote:
mikvan52 wrote:
Guess I have to wait 2 more years until we're both in the same age group. Yawn....
You might be in the same C2 age group by then, but you will never be in the same range group as defined by TSO.

Bob S.
No one has to wait on anything or anyone in order to row a good 2K time OTErg.

An erg race is just a race against the clock.

There is no race strategy, no wind, no waves, no course, no cold, etc.

Just you, your training, and the machine.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 29th, 2011, 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

aharmer
6k Poster
Posts: 627
Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 11:23 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by aharmer » April 29th, 2011, 2:43 pm

You can talk about your 17:10 from 8 years ago. That's it. You'll never post an IND_V 5k again, let alone something within a minute of your PB. You have every right to prove me wrong...or just talk about how you're going to.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 29th, 2011, 2:45 pm

aharmer wrote:You can talk about your 17:10 from 8 years ago. That's it. You'll never post an IND_V 5k again, let alone something within a minute of your PB. You have every right to prove me wrong...or just talk about how you're going to.
Sure, I will.

But not until I post a FM, HM, 60min, 10K, and 6K.

Race preparation is best done from the top down.

My focus now is a FM @ 1:48 and a HM @ 1:45.

The former is six seconds per 500m faster than I was eight years ago.

The latter is four seconds per 500m faster than I was eight years ago.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » April 29th, 2011, 2:46 pm

ranger wrote:No one has to wait on anything or anyone in order to row a good 2K time OTErg.
So what are you waiting for? Season 2010/11 isn't over yet.

Locked