Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 1:21 pm

Hey.

I hear that most people think that the way to get rich is to buy high and sell low.

Go figure.

It is now a documented fact.

The investment strategies of the average individual investor are _less_ fruitful than doing nothing.

The things people think they should do with their money, and are often moved to do, are not only unfruitful.

They are detrimental!

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 1:32 pm

Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).

This work is now done.

Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?

We'll soon see.

I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Citroen » April 21st, 2011, 2:28 pm

ranger wrote:
Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).

This work is now done.

Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?

We'll soon see.

I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).

ranger
Where's the IND_V 6:16?
Where's the IND_V 1:44 FM?
Why can't I find a result from you that's better than your 7:02 2K?

Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?

The videos and photos are either ancient history, or irrelevant short distances with funky force curves.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 2:55 pm

citroen wrote:Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?
Nope.

As the times over distances rowed in the rankings illustrate, everyone is neglecting technique, so (after a very short while) they are just getting worse and worse.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 2:57 pm

citroen wrote:funky force curves
There is nothing more telling about your rowing than your force curve.

It's the sine qua non of training.

If you aren't effective and efficient in your rowing, even if you are fast, you are falling _waaay_ short of your potential.

You might be fit, but you are wasting your time and energy!

High peak forces reflect quick legs, good timing, and complex footwork.

Short drive times indicate high ratios.

The former adds effectiveness.

The latter, efficiency.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by jliddil » April 21st, 2011, 3:14 pm

Citroen wrote:
ranger wrote:
Citroen wrote:I think many of us follow this thread hoping for a verifiable result to be posted
I have posted the results of my work on technique--in various forms (videos, screen shots, trials, etc.).

This work is now done.

Will this work on technique have a bearing on my distance times and 2K?

We'll soon see.

I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (95 df.).

ranger
Where's the IND_V 6:16?
Where's the IND_V 1:44 FM?
Why can't I find a result from you that's better than your 7:02 2K?

Have they changed the ranking system to use SPI and df values or is it still the traditional distance over time?

The videos and photos are either ancient history, or irrelevant short distances with funky force curves.
Of course as usual he completed ignored your question and cam back with a nonsense answer
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » April 21st, 2011, 3:29 pm

ranger wrote:
citroen wrote:funky force curves
There is nothing more telling about your rowing than your force curve.

It's the sine qua non of training.
It says nothing about _rowing_ and very little about one's erging.

it's a one stroke stunt; a cameo. Anyone could be taught to replicate your precious force curve in a matter of hours.

Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.

Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.

Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.

leadville
2k Poster
Posts: 320
Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
Location: Vermont and Connecticut

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by leadville » April 21st, 2011, 4:35 pm

bellboy wrote:
ausrwr wrote:
ranger wrote:So.

Here is your chance to be helpful and positive, Henry.

What do you think I should do in order to pull a lwt 6:16?

Any ideas?

ranger
Rich, the only way you're going to pull a 6:16 LWT is to follow EE into a bar and dose his drink with Rohypnol.


Post of the year without question!
Careful, he may be on the next plane headed east...
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Bob S. » April 21st, 2011, 4:55 pm

snowleopard wrote: Crikey Bob! Do you think I (or anyone else) am expecting a sensible answer?

Beware of occupying the moral high ground, nothing here is quite what it seems :lol:
Well, you do have a point there. As far as high moral ground is concerned, it is obvious that I have no claim to that. My own posting establishes the fact the I read the thread (well the responses, at least) and that alone is enough to give the lie to any such claim

Bob S.

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Bob S. » April 21st, 2011, 5:00 pm

snowleopard wrote:For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
That may be true for diehard ergers, but real rowers have a lot more options, ranging on up to ocean crossings.

Bob S.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 5:56 pm

snowleopard wrote:t's a one stroke stunt
No, as I have demonstrated, the force curves on all of my strokes look the same.

That's true for everyone.

Rowing is repetitive.

Just more of the same, more of the same.

The force curve tells you what you are doing with your technique.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 6:03 pm

snowleopard wrote:Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.
Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.
What does a season have to do with my rowing goals?

I have three WR rows.

I have won all of the major championships.

Last year no one my age came within 20 seconds of my 2K, even though I didn't prepare for my races.

My goal now is to row to the limits of my potential.

That's a trick, not a one-season affair.

My potential, I think, is about three seconds per 500m faster than my pb.

You don't get that done by racing.

You get that done by overcoming your weaknesses, which I have now done.

To focus on outcomes elides an interest in training altogether.

The outcome is the result of the training.

The outcome is not the training.

For those who have prepared to race many times, race preparation is also not training.

No one ever got any better from race preparation.

Those who just prepare to race, and race, prepare to race, and race, just get worse and worse, especially if they are aging.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 21st, 2011, 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

aharmer
6k Poster
Posts: 627
Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 11:23 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by aharmer » April 21st, 2011, 6:25 pm

ranger wrote:
snowleopard wrote:Training is about outcomes. If you don't subscribe to that you are just exercising. You're a cellar rat.
Outcomes measure the effectiveness of your training. For ergers and rowers the only outcome that really counts is the 2K.
Your season's best is a 7:02 and change. More than a 100 watts away from your self-declared potential.
What does a season have to do with my rowing goals?

I have three WR rows.

I have won all of the major championships.

Last year no one my age came within 20 seconds of my 2K, even though I didn't prepare for my races.

My goal now is to row to the limits of my potential.

That's a trick, not a one-season affair.

My potential, I think, is about three seconds per 500m faster than my pb.

You don't get that done by racing.

You get that done by overcoming your weaknesses, which I have now done.

To focus on outcomes, elides an interest in training altogether.

The outcome is the result of the training.

The outcome is not the training.

For those who have prepared to race many times, race preparation is also not training.

No one ever got any better from race preparation.

Those who just prepare to race, and race, prepare to race, and race, just get worse and worse, especially if they are aging.

ranger
Congrats to you for overcoming all of your weaknesses over the last 6 years of training. We'll see the fruits of that labor in a 1:48 FM by the end of this weekend, or have plans changed?

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 21st, 2011, 6:29 pm

aharmer wrote:Congrats to you for overcoming all of your weaknesses over the last 6 years of training. We'll see the fruits of that labor in a 1:48 FM by the end of this weekend, or have plans changed?
No change in plans.

The plan is to keep rowing a lot of 1:48 @ 23-25 spm (11-12 SPI), steady state, HR at 155 bpm (75% HRR), until I can do it for a FM.

Sure, I think that should be soon, especially since I am now done teaching until September.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 21st, 2011, 6:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Carl Watts
Marathon Poster
Posts: 4688
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 4:35 pm
Location: NEW ZEALAND

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Carl Watts » April 21st, 2011, 6:32 pm

The current season ends on 1st May 2011.

This is an important message to let everyone know to check the date on there computer as it appears some people still have it set for 6 or 7 years ago.
Carl Watts.
Age:56 Weight: 108kg Height:183cm
Concept 2 Monitor Service Technician & indoor rower.
http://log.concept2.com/profile/863525/log

Locked