Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 4:12 am

Lancs--

Have you ever tried rowing at low drag (e.g., 95 df.).

If not, why not?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

PaulH
6k Poster
Posts: 993
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:03 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by PaulH » April 13th, 2011, 4:13 am

ranger wrote:
citroen wrote:You won't show us that the FM, HM, hour, 10K, 6K, 5K
Sure I will.
I reckon that, despite 1:40 being ranger's alleged distance speed, we won't see an IND_V 2k this season below 6:40. It would be interesting to be proven wrong, but I'm not too worried.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 4:15 am

macroth wrote: start by rowing 6:00 without a break
I am starting with a FM, about two and half hours of rowing.

Sure, if I can rate 27 spm, I might do 1:45 for the FM.

That's right at 11 SPI.

4-to-1 ratio

95 df.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by hjs » April 13th, 2011, 4:16 am

ranger wrote:Lancs--

Have you ever tried rowing at low drag (e.g., 95 df.).

If not, why not?

ranger
Dangy have you ever tried to do something promise every day, if not why not ?
Last edited by hjs on April 13th, 2011, 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 4:57 am

citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
Demonstably not.

I have never rowed at 95 df. in a big ratio.

Just the opposite.

I have consistently trained and raced at max drag, or something close to max, in a low ratio.

Sure, I can pull WR pace at max drag, too, as I have done the last two years (6:41).

But I am _much_ better at low drag (95 df.).

True.

Distance rowing at 32 spm is not a new thing for me.

As I mentioned, that's what I did when I first took up rowing.

But rowing badly at max drag, back then, I only pulled 9 SPI.

Now, rowing well at low drag, I pull 11 SPI.

At 32 spm, 2 SPI is worth 64 watts, right around 7 seconds per 500.

This is the difference between 1:48 (278 watts) and 1:41 (340 watts).

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Citroen » April 13th, 2011, 6:08 am

ranger wrote:
citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
Demonstably not.
Then it must be time for you to post another (non-private) nice little (non-anchor hauling) video on uTube. We've got to see this super new stroke so we can be sure you're not lying again (as ever).

JimR
5k Poster
Posts: 544
Joined: March 20th, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by JimR » April 13th, 2011, 6:16 am

ranger wrote:
lancs wrote:stroke not ready
Sure feels great, though.
Feelings ... nothing more than feelings ...

Reminds me of a song.

JimR

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 8:24 am

Citroen wrote:
ranger wrote:
citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
Demonstably not.
Then it must be time for you to post another (non-private) nice little (non-anchor hauling) video on uTube. We've got to see this super new stroke so we can be sure you're not lying again (as ever).
It is impossible for a little old lightweight like me to anchor-haul an easy 11.5 SPI at 95 df.

It can't be done.

The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.

You have to be quick and long with your legs to get the necessary work done against such light resistance.

At 95 df., I still get 120 kg.F of peak force with my legs in the first .2 seconds of the drive.

Image


ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » April 13th, 2011, 9:24 am

ranger wrote:long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms
Are telescopic arms among your unique physical characteristics? Must be kinda hard to not move the handle while executing your Riverdance routine :roll:

KevJGK
2k Poster
Posts: 480
Joined: June 9th, 2009, 3:26 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by KevJGK » April 13th, 2011, 9:30 am

ranger wrote:The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.
I think you may be overcomplicating things a little. :idea:
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011

ThatMoos3Guy
2k Poster
Posts: 401
Joined: February 6th, 2007, 11:36 pm
Location: NH and NY

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ThatMoos3Guy » April 13th, 2011, 9:42 am

ranger wrote: The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.
Has someone been watching too many hong kong films? http://www.lovehkfilm.com/reviews_2/triple_tap.html

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 10:31 am

snowleopard wrote:Must be kinda hard to not move the handle while executing your Riverdance routine
Naw.

Your legs and core move the handle just fine, doing 75% of the work before you pull with the lats, delts, etc.

I suspect the little break in my force curve, 2/3 of the way through, is where I pull with my arms.

The darker part of the line at the top of the curve is where I finish my legs and swing my back.

The three phases of the stroke are clearly visible.

It looks as though I get about 100 kg.F with my quads, which rises to 120 kg.F when I set my heels and push with my hams and gluts and then swing my back.

Image

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8010
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Citroen » April 13th, 2011, 11:12 am

ranger wrote:Image
How about a photo or video that's less than a week old? That one from April, 6th is past it's USE-BY date.

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » April 13th, 2011, 11:15 am

Citroen wrote:
ranger wrote:Image
How about a photo or video that's less than a week old? That one from April, 6th is past it's USE-BY date.
There has been no change in my force contour when rowing at 95 df.

No need to post any more of them.

They all look the same.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » April 13th, 2011, 11:44 am

ranger wrote:Your legs and core move the handle just fine, doing 75% of the work before you pull with the lats, delts, etc.
You might want to give that a bit more thought :roll:

Locked