Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Lancs--
Have you ever tried rowing at low drag (e.g., 95 df.).
If not, why not?
ranger
Have you ever tried rowing at low drag (e.g., 95 df.).
If not, why not?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I reckon that, despite 1:40 being ranger's alleged distance speed, we won't see an IND_V 2k this season below 6:40. It would be interesting to be proven wrong, but I'm not too worried.ranger wrote:Sure I will.citroen wrote:You won't show us that the FM, HM, hour, 10K, 6K, 5K
Re: Ranger's training thread
I am starting with a FM, about two and half hours of rowing.macroth wrote: start by rowing 6:00 without a break
Sure, if I can rate 27 spm, I might do 1:45 for the FM.
That's right at 11 SPI.
4-to-1 ratio
95 df.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
Dangy have you ever tried to do something promise every day, if not why not ?ranger wrote:Lancs--
Have you ever tried rowing at low drag (e.g., 95 df.).
If not, why not?
ranger
Last edited by hjs on April 13th, 2011, 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Demonstably not.citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
I have never rowed at 95 df. in a big ratio.
Just the opposite.
I have consistently trained and raced at max drag, or something close to max, in a low ratio.
Sure, I can pull WR pace at max drag, too, as I have done the last two years (6:41).
But I am _much_ better at low drag (95 df.).
True.
Distance rowing at 32 spm is not a new thing for me.
As I mentioned, that's what I did when I first took up rowing.
But rowing badly at max drag, back then, I only pulled 9 SPI.
Now, rowing well at low drag, I pull 11 SPI.
At 32 spm, 2 SPI is worth 64 watts, right around 7 seconds per 500.
This is the difference between 1:48 (278 watts) and 1:41 (340 watts).
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Ranger's training thread
Then it must be time for you to post another (non-private) nice little (non-anchor hauling) video on uTube. We've got to see this super new stroke so we can be sure you're not lying again (as ever).ranger wrote:Demonstably not.citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
Re: Ranger's training thread
Feelings ... nothing more than feelings ...ranger wrote:Sure feels great, though.lancs wrote:stroke not ready
Reminds me of a song.
JimR
Re: Ranger's training thread
It is impossible for a little old lightweight like me to anchor-haul an easy 11.5 SPI at 95 df.Citroen wrote:Then it must be time for you to post another (non-private) nice little (non-anchor hauling) video on uTube. We've got to see this super new stroke so we can be sure you're not lying again (as ever).ranger wrote:Demonstably not.citroen wrote:Your rowing is no different now to how it ever was
It can't be done.
The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.
You have to be quick and long with your legs to get the necessary work done against such light resistance.
At 95 df., I still get 120 kg.F of peak force with my legs in the first .2 seconds of the drive.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
Are telescopic arms among your unique physical characteristics? Must be kinda hard to not move the handle while executing your Riverdance routineranger wrote:long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms
Re: Ranger's training thread
I think you may be overcomplicating things a little.ranger wrote:The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 401
- Joined: February 6th, 2007, 11:36 pm
- Location: NH and NY
Re: Ranger's training thread
Has someone been watching too many hong kong films? http://www.lovehkfilm.com/reviews_2/triple_tap.htmlranger wrote: The triple tap at the footplate (toe-heel-toe) matching the triplet of leg levers (quads-hams&gluts-calves) has to be complete before the midpoint of the drive and the swing of the back, long before any engagement of the delts, lats, and arms.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Naw.snowleopard wrote:Must be kinda hard to not move the handle while executing your Riverdance routine
Your legs and core move the handle just fine, doing 75% of the work before you pull with the lats, delts, etc.
I suspect the little break in my force curve, 2/3 of the way through, is where I pull with my arms.
The darker part of the line at the top of the curve is where I finish my legs and swing my back.
The three phases of the stroke are clearly visible.
It looks as though I get about 100 kg.F with my quads, which rises to 120 kg.F when I set my heels and push with my hams and gluts and then swing my back.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Ranger's training thread
How about a photo or video that's less than a week old? That one from April, 6th is past it's USE-BY date.ranger wrote:
Re: Ranger's training thread
There has been no change in my force contour when rowing at 95 df.Citroen wrote:How about a photo or video that's less than a week old? That one from April, 6th is past it's USE-BY date.ranger wrote:
No need to post any more of them.
They all look the same.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
You might want to give that a bit more thoughtranger wrote:Your legs and core move the handle just fine, doing 75% of the work before you pull with the lats, delts, etc.