Has Mike ever sunk an 8+?ranger wrote:With[sic] has to do with skill, how well you row.
Ranger's training thread
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Mike--
It's time to climb the 10 MPS ladder.
The good apples are higher up in the tree.
You won't find much good fruit scrambling around on the ground down by the trunk.
That's what ladders are for: to get you where you want to go.
1:43 @ 29 spm (11 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:47 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:51 @ 27 spm (9.5 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:55 @ 26 spm (9 SPI, 10 MPS)
ranger
It's time to climb the 10 MPS ladder.
The good apples are higher up in the tree.
You won't find much good fruit scrambling around on the ground down by the trunk.
That's what ladders are for: to get you where you want to go.
1:43 @ 29 spm (11 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:47 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:51 @ 27 spm (9.5 SPI, 10 MPS)
1:55 @ 26 spm (9 SPI, 10 MPS)
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Ah, but a cross section of the trunk would show the growth!ranger wrote: up in the tree.
You won't find much good fruit scrambling around on the ground down by the trunk.
Here are some tree rings in the 60's lwt men
60-69 light men Best times each year
2002 Philip Stubley 62 GBR
7:03.3
IND
2003 Philip Stubley 63 GBR
7:01.9
RACE
2004 Philip Stubley 63 GBR
7:01.9
RACE
2005 Roger Prowse 60 GBR
6:48.8
IND
2006 Roger Prowse 60 GBR
6:48.8
RACE
2007 Brian Bailey 61 GBR
6:42.5…………………………………World Record
RACE
2008 Brian Bailey 62 GBR
6:53.8
RACE
2009 Brian Bailey 62 GBR
6:51.8
RACE
2010 Hugh Pite 65 CAN
7:02.7
2011 Tor Arne Simonsen 60 NOR
6:51.0 RACE
Tore rides his bike most of the year... and can still get a rankings best. You just fiddle with drag factor and pointless minutia.
You've got a month... Let's see sub 6:51.0 from you. Do you acknowledge just how modest a time that would be for a potential 6:16er?
Re: Ranger's training thread
Or something to that effect.ranger wrote:Mike--
Please, please, I'm begging you, please respond to my bs about YOUR training, so we can take the focus away from the fact that I'm a lying, despicable old man and my racing career is over.
Edit:
ranger wrote:Attaboy, Mike!
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
Re: Ranger's training thread
Oh I see, it's a word order thing - "I think I'll now row..." would more conventionally be rendered "I now think I'll row..."Citroen wrote:You missed the "I think" (cross that off on your BS bingo card). The thinking is done NOW, the rowing isn't needed.PaulH wrote:Go on then - the day is young for you, so do exactly what you said; 60min, 1:43 @ 29 spm, *now*. Or does now not mean, um, now?ranger wrote: Actually, at 95 df., I think I'll now row 60min, 1:43 @ 29 spm.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Mike--
It is a pointless cop out to race, race, race, rowing badly, just to show that, sure, you can indeed row badly, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
It makes much more sense just to stop rowing badly altogether, even if it means not racing, and learn to row well.
Then, once you have learned to row well, you can race, race, race, showing that you can indeed row well, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
ranger
It is a pointless cop out to race, race, race, rowing badly, just to show that, sure, you can indeed row badly, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
It makes much more sense just to stop rowing badly altogether, even if it means not racing, and learn to row well.
Then, once you have learned to row well, you can race, race, race, showing that you can indeed row well, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I pulled WR pace for my age and weight the last two years (6:41), without even preparing for it.mikvan52 wrote:Tore rides his bike most of the year... and can still get a rankings best.
No one my age and weight had ever rowed that fast.
Tore now misses WR 2K pace for his age and weight by six seconds per 500m.
When I am fully prepared to race, my goal now is to row _faster_ than WR 2K pace for my age and weight by six seconds per 500m.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
That is funny, you are the one who races the most and for someone claiming to row 6.16 all your races are very very bad, even your 6.41ranger wrote:Mike--
It is a pointless cop out to race, race, race, rowing badly, just to show that, sure, you can indeed row badly, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
ranger
Missing a target with 25 seconds is just a firm paddle. And almost nobody races more than, although you say it is pointless yourself
Re: Ranger's training thread
Mike is referring to Tor Arne Simonsen. (Not Tore Foss)ranger wrote:I pulled WR pace for my age and weight the last two years (6:41), without even preparing for it.mikvan52 wrote:Tore rides his bike most of the year... and can still get a rankings best.
No one my age and weight had ever rowed that fast.
Tore now misses WR 2K pace for his age and weight by six seconds per 500m.
When I am fully prepared to race, my goal now is to row _faster_ than WR 2K pace for my age and weight by six seconds per 500m.
ranger
Interesting how many cyclists have been top ranking in ranger's age groups throughout the years. The triathletes, Watt and Seibach in the 50-54 group, Brooks and Hastings in the 55 to 59. Now Simonsen in the new group 60-64 .
The best ergers are not rowers at all, they are cyclists.
Get that new bike!
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
This hollow truism applies to every erger and can be discarded. Only one individual meets the exact criteria for age (to the second) and weight (to the gram).ranger wrote:No one my age and weight had ever rowed that fast.
This is why we have age categories and this is why ranger no longer competes with his peers. Or when he does he skulks from the arena and his graceless behavior in public reflects what we see here.
Re: Ranger's training thread
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Re: Ranger's training thread
Although in this case, if you stand at the 2K/6:30 mark you'll be safely out of reach.jliddil wrote:
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
Re: Ranger's training thread
None of the ergers you listed can/could pull 6:28 at just shy of 53.mrfit wrote:The best ergers are not rowers at all
Then, once they pulled a WR, none of the ergers you listed could figure out how to get better.
I did the first _and_ the second, and am in the process of doing the second again, this time in a much larger way.
As far as I know, Watt, Brook, and Hastings are no longer race on the erg.
Siebach isn't even 53 and now pulls 6:35, ten seconds slower than he was a couple of years ago.
My goal is to pull 6:16 at 60, rowing well at low drag.
Simonsen just pulled 6:51 at 60, 35 seconds slower.
So, you're right.
If you want to be the best in this sport, you don't want to be a triathlete or cyclist.
You want to learn to row OTW, as I have.
You want to be a rower.
You want to learn row well.
Rowing is significantly technical and sport-specific, even indoor rowing.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 1st, 2011, 11:17 am, edited 4 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
hjs wrote:That is funny, you are the one who races the most and for someone claiming to row 6.16 all your races are very very bad, even your 6.41ranger wrote:Mike--
It is a pointless cop out to race, race, race, rowing badly, just to show that, sure, you can indeed row badly, even when you are rowing as hard as you can.
ranger
Missing a target with 25 seconds is just a firm paddle. And almost nobody races more than, although you say it is pointless yourself
Re: Ranger's training thread
ranger wrote: My goal is to pull 6:16 at 60, rowing well at low drag.
You want to learn to row OTW, as I have.
ranger
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;