I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yes, but ranger has said these past few years that he would only go if C2 paid his way, ie if he qualified at a satellite event. This doesn't quite gel with the fact that he's filthy richGus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1138d/1138dcf9a78666989a0df06047e3a93ca77d9a8b" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
Re: Ranger's training thread
Sure.Gus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
Great posting, just the plain and simple truth, is there light at the end of the tunnel, can that really be ?ranger wrote:Sure.Gus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1138d/1138dcf9a78666989a0df06047e3a93ca77d9a8b" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Re: Ranger's training thread
A change of heart? Wonderful news! Entry deadline is this Sunday, Feb. 6th, don't miss it.ranger wrote:Sure.Gus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
About that "if I don't qualify" bit, how do you expect to qualify if you don't enter a satellite event? Are you racing in Cincinnati on the 13th after all? There's still time to sign up.
And remember, you have a race this Saturday in Detroit (non-satellite).
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 320
- Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
- Location: Vermont and Connecticut
Re: Ranger's training thread
hey rangerboy, don't forget to register. looking forward to yet another abysmal failure as you demonstrate one more time your complete inability to perform - and the incompetence of your coach!ranger wrote:Sure.Gus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 320
- Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
- Location: Vermont and Connecticut
Re: Ranger's training thread
hey rangerboy, don't forget to register. looking forward to yet another abysmal failure as you demonstrate one more time your complete inability to perform - and the incompetence of your coach!ranger wrote:Sure.Gus wrote:I keep seeing people writing about "qualifying" for CRASH-B/WIRC. There is no qualifying requirement. Anyone can enter. Even someone as slow as ranger.macroth wrote:Too bad it's not a CRASH-B qualifier either.
This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
then again, given the lack of material your coach has to deal with, it may be unfair to blame the coach.
and, given the demonstrated idiocy of the coach, it's tough to blame rangerboy.
sigh.
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b
Re: Ranger's training thread
Funny we're on page 616 of this sorry saga. It's the_only_616 this thread will ever see.
Why no Toronto race? That's_really_disappointing.
It's still snowing hard here but the roads will be all cleared by tomorrow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd901/fd901279abcd2d2cef34db976c65643b2a9df68b" alt="Razz :P"
Why no Toronto race? That's_really_disappointing.
It's still snowing hard here but the roads will be all cleared by tomorrow.
David Chmilowskyj
M 58 6ft 4in/1.94m 230lb/105kg
Team Oarsome
M 58 6ft 4in/1.94m 230lb/105kg
Team Oarsome
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Ranger's training thread
That's because of all the folks who keep feeding our favourite troll.Tinpusher wrote:Funny we're on page 616 of this sorry saga. It's the_only_616 this thread will ever see.![]()
Re: Ranger's training thread
Dougie:Citroen wrote:That's because of all the folks who keep feeding our favourite troll.Tinpusher wrote:Funny we're on page 616 of this sorry saga. It's the_only_616 this thread will ever see.![]()
It should be abundantly clear by now that the r(dot)cureton/cretin/{Bot} does not require sustenance to keep on posting
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c02/45c0292c33d03ab11614e566e80da1971b85139c" alt="Confused :?"
Let his rhyth-mysticy continue on forever! ........ "6:16 ~ forever ~ if"
BTW: I was over in Alexandria, Virginia, the other day to witness the satellite erg race there.
REAL COMPETITIORS were there: (SPOUSTA & SIEBACH & many others)... both erging times that ranger will never approach again.
Those of us posting here are only interested in the hype-o-thetical
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ecc/b8ecc92cbf5dfb63a5058b388bc38e7a51eeb0bd" alt="Crying or Very sad :cry:"
and only mildly so for the great (but relatively mundane) performances by those who remain great.
Re: Ranger's training thread
Does trying to do your best include showing up but not doing the race?ranger wrote: This year, if I don't qualify, I am going anyway, on my own coin.
I'll just drag my slow sorry ass there and try to do my best.
ranger
Re: Ranger's training thread
You're welcome.Citroen wrote: That's because of all the folks who keep feeding our favourite troll.
Re: Ranger's training thread
I'll race in Cincinnati (rather than Cleveland, as I had planned).macroth wrote:how do you expect to qualify if you don't enter a satellite event?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Naw.mikvan52 wrote:BTW: I was over in Alexandria, Virginia, the other day to witness the satellite erg race there.
REAL COMPETITIORS were there: (SPOUSTA & SIEBACH & many others)... both erging times that ranger will never approach again.
I think I'll beat Spousta at WIRC 2011.
I don't have to bother with Siebach (he is eight years younger than I am), although I think he will also be slower than I am now.
He is _certainly_ slower than I was when I was his age.
ranger
P.S. Why were you just "witnessing," rather than rowing?
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I am getting in nice 60min bike rides after rowing, although I would like to stretch both my erg sessions and my bike sessions to two hours.
Anyway, the biking is keeping my weight down.
ranger
Anyway, the biking is keeping my weight down.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)