Nice.
I'll be workin' on it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0124/d0124cea67de00af01e030201a4b2a637f1a5a19" alt="Very Happy :D"
I am a distance specialist.
For the better part of my athletic history (25 years), I was a marathon runner.
ranger
Refreshing to see you totally avoiding the question, as ever.ranger wrote:When I retire in two years, my wife and I will spend six months in Door County (May-October), four months in Ann Arbor (November, December, March, April), and two months in a southern (Sarasota?, Tempe?, San Diego?) venue (January, February), somewhere that I can row OTW in the winter.ausrwr wrote:But not exactly ownership of 2 half-million dollar homes, is it? You own a fraction of one, and the other one has only ever been as high as 80% of what you claimed.
No, I won't pay rent for the home I stay in for the six months in Door County, WI, one of the 10 best summer vacation spots in the US.
I own it.
No, I won't pay rent for staying in my Ann Arbor home, once of the ten best cities in the US to live in. I own it.
I will probably rent rather than own for wherever I stay for the two months that I will spend in a southern venue, though.
And that's o.k.
We can afford it.
ranger
How about going even more conservative, aiming at perhaps 6:42, and then upping the pace in the last 300 if you feel up to it on the day?ranger wrote:In my first race this winter at Indy on Saturday, I think it might be good to more conservative and just rate 28 spm.
If I row right through the race, holding my technique steady, I should pull 1:39/6:36.
That would be eight seconds under the qualifying standard of 6:44 for 60s hwts at WIRC 2011.
Qualifying standards for WIRC predict bronze level performances.
Then, as I sharpen harder and harder, I can up the rate 2 spm per race until Boston.
30 spm at Toronto, 32 spm at Cleveland, 34 spm at Boston.
ranger
No need to misrepresent things.mrfit wrote:What would you think if he told you that he trained on a Kurt Kenetic at an HR of 170 and 20+ miles per hour ... but later you found it was only about 17 mph?
Sure, I'll try to kick it in over the last 300m.PaulH wrote:How about going even more conservative, aiming at perhaps 6:42, and then upping the pace in the last 300 if you feel up to it on the day?
Sad to hear that. I'll go with a prediction of 6:48-6:52 then.ranger wrote:Sure, I'll try to kick it in over the last 300m.PaulH wrote:How about going even more conservative, aiming at perhaps 6:42, and then upping the pace in the last 300 if you feel up to it on the day?
28 spm is about as low as I want to rate, though.
ranger
A hwt 6:50, rowing well, at low drag, pretty prepared?PaulH wrote:I'll go with a prediction of 6:48-6:52 then
It would be nice if you put the results of this row in the long list of other rows you have promised to this season, the season before and the seasons before that oneranger wrote:I'll see if I can get in 4 x 2K @ 28 spm tomorrow and Friday.
That should tell me where I'm at.
28 spm is just a tad above the 26 spm I have been doing in my "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" sessions.
ranger
Why? Sorry, you're on your own when it comes to making up excuses. I have every confidence you'll come up with something though.ranger wrote:
A hwt 6:50, rowing well, at low drag, pretty prepared?
After last year's lwt 6:41, rowing poorly at max drag, unprepared?
Why?
ranger
And 2k is more than a tad above the uninterrupted distance you've been doing in your "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" sessions...ranger wrote:
28 spm is just a tad above the 26 spm I have been doing in my "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" sessions.
ranger
Sure.redzone wrote:And 2k is more than a tad above the uninterrupted distance you've been doing in your "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" sessions...
Not a very good one though, if memory serves. In fact, erging is the first sport in which you've had any success. Of course, the 50+ age groups, while perfectly respectable, aren't exactly teeming with top performers. At WIRC 2010, there were all of 17 competitors in the 50-54 MLW category (the one where you had your best races, 7-8 years ago), less than half of whom came in under 7:20 (winner in 6:31, with 14 seconds to spare!)ranger wrote:
I am a distance specialist.
For the better part of my athletic history (25 years), I was a marathon runner.
ranger