Carl Watts wrote:Lol so you think you can row a 1:26 500m and still call it sub-max ?
I think not that's my PB at 36 spm and you don't have the power to do it anymore regardless of rating.
Still it's less than a minute and a half of your time so I'm sure you can easily find the time to fit one in before you fly and rank it. But like the 2K before you go it's not going to happen.
We are however glued to the screen awaiting the result from BIRC 2010......
And you weigh 100kgs and are a younger man.
I'm not saying that you, Carl, are like this (because I do not know you)... but there are quite a few middle aged men who have (sort of) convinced themselves that they will not get slower as they age.
Perhaps that is why some newbies like the "I'm much better than that now statement" and hang on to a small expectation that ranger will do something "unprecedented".
In my forties, I was a sub 1:30 500m performer... and this was w/o the intense training similar to what I've done recently. Such training holds my 500m best at 1:30.x (fact, not "if I" or "should")
As I've watched (for the last 3 years): Newbie's come and go... after they discover that the only they get from ranger is a "HRQ" and slowly declining 2k times... albeit very very fast for his age... "Great job, TSO, now run along back your basement."
There is a salient point in all this banter:
Roy Brook is not worried about losing his record.
He and I have discussed this at length in and around the two times we sat next to an empty erg seat at CRASH-Bs.. reserved for ... the special one (TSO).