Given that, why are you proposing to race at BIRC at 31 spm?ranger wrote:Give or take a bit, if you consider 36 spm as an ideal racing rate for the erg, in the lightweight male ranks
Ranger's training thread
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
Wow.
This is sharpening nirvana.
I am now pulling 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI), just naturally.
That is, I am rowing perfectly for a lightweight of any age--at 1K pace and rate.
Relaxed and smooth.
Butta.
Well, that's all she wrote in terms of sharpening workouts.
All I need to do every day is sit down on the erg, warm up, and then do as much 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI) as I can, until it is second nature to me.
Doesn't matter how I do it.
Heck, I can do it any old way but loose.
Take 20 strokes.
Take 60 strokes.
Take 30 strokes.
Take 100 strokes.
Do it again.
'
Do it again.
Do it again.
Do it for a couple of hours a session, who cares how.
What does it matter?
For a 60-year-old lwt, 1:30 @ 37 (13 SPI) is so good, it's ridiculous.
No 55s/60s lwt can row 1:30 flat out for 500m.
When I turn 60 this winter, 1:30 becomes 2K - 10.5 pace.
If I get 1:30 @ 37 spm done for 8 x 500m (3:30 rest) and a 1K trial, what then?
The 60s lwt WR for 1K is 1:37.2/3:14.4.
(And then there is this: Dan Staite cheated, and Kent Timm is some sort of shadowman that no one has ever seen.)
There's that seven seconds per 500m again!
1000 2:56.7 23 Daniel Teoli L M USA 2011 Witnessed at Public Club
1000 2:57.0 13 Dan Warren L M USA 2000 Historical record*
1000 2:57.8 32 Dan Staite L M GBR 2006 PM3/PM4 verification code
1000 2:59.0 46 Kent Timm L M USA 2005 Historical record*
1000 3:03.3 50 Steven Geary L M NZL 2008 2007 Australasian Games
1000 3:14.4 60 Mark Thomas L M USA 2011 PM3/PM4 verification code
1000 3:27.7 12 Marian Uroic L M HRV 2004 Historical record*
1000 3:29.1 70 Roger Bangay L M GBR 2008 Witnessed at Public Club
1000 3:47.2 80 Dean Smith L M USA 2007 PM3/PM4 verification code
I guess it's three months of 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI) from here on out to WIRC.
If I sharpen at this speed (1:30) and effectiveness (13 SPI) for three months, building up more and more efficiency as the days go by, my 2K goal is secure.
By WIRC 2011, I will be the best I can be:
6:16 for 2K--at 60.
ranger
This is sharpening nirvana.
I am now pulling 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI), just naturally.
That is, I am rowing perfectly for a lightweight of any age--at 1K pace and rate.
Relaxed and smooth.
Butta.
Well, that's all she wrote in terms of sharpening workouts.
All I need to do every day is sit down on the erg, warm up, and then do as much 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI) as I can, until it is second nature to me.
Doesn't matter how I do it.
Heck, I can do it any old way but loose.
Take 20 strokes.
Take 60 strokes.
Take 30 strokes.
Take 100 strokes.
Do it again.
'
Do it again.
Do it again.
Do it for a couple of hours a session, who cares how.
What does it matter?
For a 60-year-old lwt, 1:30 @ 37 (13 SPI) is so good, it's ridiculous.
No 55s/60s lwt can row 1:30 flat out for 500m.
When I turn 60 this winter, 1:30 becomes 2K - 10.5 pace.
If I get 1:30 @ 37 spm done for 8 x 500m (3:30 rest) and a 1K trial, what then?
The 60s lwt WR for 1K is 1:37.2/3:14.4.
(And then there is this: Dan Staite cheated, and Kent Timm is some sort of shadowman that no one has ever seen.)
There's that seven seconds per 500m again!
1000 2:56.7 23 Daniel Teoli L M USA 2011 Witnessed at Public Club
1000 2:57.0 13 Dan Warren L M USA 2000 Historical record*
1000 2:57.8 32 Dan Staite L M GBR 2006 PM3/PM4 verification code
1000 2:59.0 46 Kent Timm L M USA 2005 Historical record*
1000 3:03.3 50 Steven Geary L M NZL 2008 2007 Australasian Games
1000 3:14.4 60 Mark Thomas L M USA 2011 PM3/PM4 verification code
1000 3:27.7 12 Marian Uroic L M HRV 2004 Historical record*
1000 3:29.1 70 Roger Bangay L M GBR 2008 Witnessed at Public Club
1000 3:47.2 80 Dean Smith L M USA 2007 PM3/PM4 verification code
I guess it's three months of 1:30 @ 37 spm (13 SPI) from here on out to WIRC.
If I sharpen at this speed (1:30) and effectiveness (13 SPI) for three months, building up more and more efficiency as the days go by, my 2K goal is secure.
By WIRC 2011, I will be the best I can be:
6:16 for 2K--at 60.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
31 spm is all that is necessary at this point.snowleopard wrote:Given that, why are you proposing to race at BIRC at 31 spm?ranger wrote:Give or take a bit, if you consider 36 spm as an ideal racing rate for the erg, in the lightweight male ranks
I'll just play it safe this time around.
No such thing come winter, though.
At the WIRC qualifiers, and WIRC itself, I'll let out all the stops.
If I am not sharp by then, I'll never be.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
There is certainly _some_ loss of aerobic capacity with age.snowleopard wrote:Given that, why are you proposing to race at BIRC at 31 spm?ranger wrote:Give or take a bit, if you consider 36 spm as an ideal racing rate for the erg, in the lightweight male ranks
No reason to row badly because of this, but there _would_ be a reason to lower the rate a bit to compensate for the loss of aerobic capacity, especially if you are 60, as I am (not 55, 50, 40, or 30).
My max HR is still _very_ high, given my age, 190 bpm, but it's not 220 bpm, as it probably was when I was 20.
So, if lightweights continue to row well (13 SPI), eventually, what we might see is this:
age/rate
20 36 spm
30 35 spm
40 34 spm
50 33 spm
55 32 spm
60 31 spm
13 SPI @ 32 spm is 6:16.
13 SPI @ 31 spm is 6:20.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I see it's "all she wrote" time again in rangerland, like it is every few days or weeks. How many times have you stated "I just need to do X and Y and the game is won", only to change your mind over and over again?
THIS, however, is good news:
At long last, all this squawking about a 6:16 2K will have to end.
Of course, why you would want to hold back at BIRC and need tree more months to sharpen is baffling.
THIS, however, is good news:
So by the end of the season, you will have to either admit that 6:4x is the best you can do fully sharpened, or concede that 6:4x is the best you'll ever do sharpened or unsharpened, which is the same thing since you'll never be sharp.At the WIRC qualifiers, and WIRC itself, I'll let out all the stops.
If I am not sharp by then, I'll never be.
At long last, all this squawking about a 6:16 2K will have to end.
Of course, why you would want to hold back at BIRC and need tree more months to sharpen is baffling.
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
Re: Ranger's training thread
In recent times, no 55s lwt has done 8 x 500m (3:30 rest) at better than 1:38, which predicts a 6:44 2K.
ranger
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Every time I was in a new training band (UT2, UT1, AT, TR), as I met my goals.macroth wrote:How many times have you stated "I just need to do X and Y and the game is won"
The training band I am in now is the last one: AN.
So, I am now in the final stage of race preparation.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
Good ideaTomR wrote:lancs,lancs wrote:I'm still not sure why you persist in making claims such as this, when you, I and everyone else here knows you can't do four of them. It must be something to do with your childhood I assume. Did your parents not give you enough recognition or something?ranger wrote:I am now working on 500s, 1:34 @ 32 spm (13 SPI).
Sure, if I get to 20 of them over the next two weeks, I'll post the screen shot.
The next thing I'm wondering is after BIRC & WIRC (and any combination of 2 from DNS/DNF/7:11/6:43), what will your pathology let you post from then on? I mean, seriously, after another season of missing your long-stated goal of 6:16 by 25 seconds can't let you carry on with the bullshit.
Can it?
You don't expect him to show up and race at BIRC do you? The mods here should tell him "no race, no post."
Or he might could do a Dwayne Adams and set off at 1.34, then roll off the erg after 30 seconds with a broken back.
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: Ranger's training thread
ranger wrote: November 8 2010
31 spm is all that is necessary at this point.
I'll just play it safe this time around.
No such thing come winter, though.
At the WIRC qualifiers, and WIRC itself, I'll let out all the stops.
If I am not sharp by then, I'll never be.
ranger
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
So your predicted 6:20 will be rowed at 31 spm?ranger wrote:31 spm is all that is necessary at this point.snowleopard wrote:Given that, why are you proposing to race at BIRC at 31 spm?ranger wrote:Give or take a bit, if you consider 36 spm as an ideal racing rate for the erg, in the lightweight male ranks
Re: Ranger's training thread
Mike VB, the current 55s lwt hammer, does 500m, flat out, 1:31 @ 46 spm (9.8 SPI).
ranger
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yep.snowleopard wrote:So your predicted 6:20 will be rowed at 31 spm?
At Baltimore in 2006, I did 1:37.4 @ 31 spm for 2K, but that was at high drag, still struggling with technique, and without sharpening.
I am quite a bit better than that now.
I now row well (13 SPI) at low drag (120 df.), and I am sharpening to race.
I think I'll now pull 1:35 @ 31 spm (13 SPI) for 2K.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on November 8th, 2010, 6:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Liar, liar, pitiful liar.ranger wrote:Every time I was in a new training band (UT2, UT1, AT, TR), as I met my goals.macroth wrote:How many times have you stated "I just need to do X and Y and the game is won"
The training band I am in now is the last one: AN.
So, I am now in the final stage of race preparation.
ranger
"1:30 @ 37 spm" (11/8)
"32 spm " (11/4)
"1:35 @ 31 spm" (10/26)
"1:35 @ 33 spm" (10/23)
"1:32 @ 36 spm" (10/21)
"1:37 @ 30 spm" (9/19) (nice symmetry with today's post, by the way)
Each time, you claimed you "just" needed to keep sharpening at these paces and rates (and these only) and 6:20/6:16 was yours at BIRC/WIRC. What "training bands" did you reach between 10/21 and 10/26?
Anyway, since you're not actually doing any significant work at any of those paces, it doesn't really matter.
Just another sign, along with your sweep stroke, rope skipping and stepper nonsense, that you're in full panic mode.
43/m/183cm/HW
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
All time PBs: 100m 14.0 | 500m 1:18.1 | 1k 2:55.7 | 2k 6:15.4 | 5k 16:59.3 | 6k 20:46.5 | 10k 35:46.0
40+ PBs: 100m 14.7 | 500m 1:20.5 | 1k 2:59.6 | 2k 6:21.9 | 5k 17:29.6 | HM 1:19:33.1| FM 2:51:58.5 | 100k 7:35:09 | 24h 250,706m
Re: Ranger's training thread
Yes, I am doing all three.macroth wrote:your sweep stroke, rope skipping and stepper
Skipping is a great warm up for rowing, a mild but great full body exercise.
Stepping is a very relaxing, effective, and safe way to cross-train. I use it for weight reduction.
Using a sweep stroke motion relaxes your shoulders (in an alternating way) at the catch, which, in turn, helps you achieve maximal compression/length.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 936
- Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am
Re: Ranger's training thread
That was a hwt row. You will be a lwt at BIRC.ranger wrote:Yep.snowleopard wrote:So your predicted 6:20 will be rowed at 31 spm?
At Baltimore in 2006, I did 1:37.4 @ 31 spm for 2K, but that was at high drag, still struggling with technique, and without sharpening.