Haven't I said before...?ranger wrote:Mike--
What in the _world_ are you doing mechanically and technically wrong to lose 50% of the easy power in your stroke?
My RLS beats your RWB every day these days... even on the ERG
Read my blog at concept2.co.uk for details...
The gist of it is (as I've said before):
Can you not acknowledge the following truth?
Ergers generate watts.
But the question becomes "How many of these watts are available for boat speed?"
An erger can get false positive reinforcement when he sees a great score that is not replicable OTW.
My quest is to adapt my stroke to maximize the proportion of these erg watts to harness them to move my single...
Erg scores are great, I love the challenge. But I will not mess up my chances to improve speed on the water.
But even on the erg:
What's your best 5k on the erg in the last 5 years? (IND_V only please) Mine is under 17:50 and is in the 17:50's THIS year..... You claimed to have 16:30 capability even though you are a mere 4-5 seconds faster at 2k OTErg in the same time period. Put up a score if you are so good.
More shamelesstalking about myself:
Witness my life-time PB at 1k this year: 3:40.18... What's yours again?
My stroke is getting better, not worse as I get weaker due to advancing years....
And before you go on and on with that drivel about "well, Mike has had more time in the boat than I have", remember that you claim to have SCULLED many more meters than I have in my life. My sweep rowing has been minimal since the early 1970's.
You talk about "seeing" 1:5x pace OTW. I see 1:31s.... on a calibrated top of the line device...
I erg less than 3,000k a year. You claim to erg 10,000k..
We should ask you... WTF's the matter w/ranger's training program?
But we don't need to... your results speak for themselves:
You flipped your 1x at a beginner's race on wide course. You erged one 6:41 2k and then threw in the towel on all
the summer's distance trials you were going to do...
Who in the erging community engages in RWB training besides you? If it's so fruitful for great perf's... many should.
.... No one does.. That speaks volumes...
I take your statements about others on this thread as transparent attempts to provoke. Why not consider constructive comments instead of seeminly exposing your disappointment with the stagnation of your own lack of advancement on the erg.
You remain best in the world for 2010 yet behind the WR... Congratulations for that. You should consider it an option to stop this false front "sub 6:30 2k" talk... You only confuse the newbies... Not me... I know this line of talk is a ruse.
My theory is that we are here to help each other... not saying things like you do:
"Avoid (RWB) at your peril"
RWB shows no substantial gains. You are still at virtually the same relative level as when you didn't use it: You got your WRs w/o RWB.. now you use RWB and you don't have the WR.... but, I agree(,!) you are still a great erger... yet you have no finish times or workout times OTW.... Tell us now why your gigantic volume of training does not yield OTW results... You have the entire summer off... and you don't race?
another fact... as I see it:
I began serious and comprehensive training on the erg in 2007. The result for the erg is 2 golds and a bronze at the World Championships (CRASH_B)... You won't even show up.
{rant over}