Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » September 1st, 2010, 3:39 pm

lancs wrote:Not man enough to row any kind of trial?
Lancs, rowing slowly at 6-8 seconds per 500m off of what you used to do, as you are doing now, is not the height of virtue, either.

No?

I have three WR rows.

Nothing to prove there.

My work over the last few years has been on technique, in particular, increasing my stroking power.

So my emphasis hasn't been on just rowing fast.

My emphasis has been on rowing faster.

At my age, when your fitness is declining, you only row faster by increasing your stroking power, by improving your technique.

Working this increased stroking power up into trials is a new experience for me.

Uncharted territory.

So I will just feel my way along.

Sure, I intend to do some at-home 2K trials, but only when I think I am ready.

And anyway, the only "trials" that will count are my 2Ks at BIRC and WIRC.

I started some sharpening today, so this is a good.

Over the next six months, I am going to do a lot of rowing, 13 SPI @ 32 spm, in whatever formats I can dream up.

For you, the 30s lwt WR is 13 SPI @ 35.5.

Hmm.

A bunch of low rate rowing at 10.5 SPI, as you are doing now (1:55 @ 22 spm) is probably not going to do it.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
chgoss
10k Poster
Posts: 1060
Joined: March 25th, 2006, 1:38 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by chgoss » September 1st, 2010, 4:01 pm

ranger wrote:
lancs wrote:Not man enough to row any kind of trial?
Lancs, rowing slowly at 6-8 seconds per 500m off of what you used to do, is not the height of virtue, either.
well, NOT doing a timed piece, just so that you dont have to face the fact that the best 2k you can do today (9/1/10) isnt going to be sub 7, is no virtue either..
52 M 6'2" 200 lbs 2k-7:03.9
1 Corinthians 15:3-8

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by lancs » September 1st, 2010, 4:03 pm

ranger wrote:Working this increased stroking power up into trials is a new experience for me.
Well I'd hurry up and do at least something to show all your hard work has been worth it. The rate at which your anaerobic threshold is declining (which it is, whether you like it or not) means that you're times will, without exception, continue to get slower and slower. If you're not smart about things you'll struggle to get that 60s WR next year and you can pretty much forget about Roy's 55s WR right now. It's too quick for you.

And as for the dig at my current training times, fair point. But I'm enjoying getting fit again and at least I don't shy away from seeing where I am in my training.. :wink:

KevJGK
2k Poster
Posts: 480
Joined: June 9th, 2009, 3:26 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by KevJGK » September 1st, 2010, 4:07 pm

Virtue my ass.

What you do with your training is of course your prerogative.

The point is you have stated repeatedly that you would do a 2K trial today. If you don’t want to do a 2K trial today then of course that’s fine. If you never want to do a 2K trial then of course that is also fine.

It might be an idea though to stop publicly stating ad nauseam that you are going to do a 2K trial on such and such a date and that you will post the results here. Because if you repeatedly say you are going to do something it is not unreasonable for people to expect you to do it.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011

whp4
6k Poster
Posts: 665
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:09 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by whp4 » September 1st, 2010, 4:12 pm

ranger wrote:
lancs wrote:Not man enough to row any kind of trial?
Lancs, rowing slowly at 6-8 seconds per 500m off of what you used to do, as you are doing now, is not the height of virtue, either.

No?

I have three WR rows.

Nothing to prove there.
Your former world record rows are no more interesting than all of the other now broken world records before them. You are a has-been lamely struggling to escape the shadow of your betters, whose records you are unable to match despite years of training and trying (all the while protesting that you hadn't even tried or prepared, an excuse that lost its potency for most of us when we said farewell to the elementary school playground).

So I will just feel my way along.

Sure, I intend to do some at-home 2K trials, but only when I think I am ready.

And anyway, the only "trials" that will count are my 2Ks at BIRC and WIRC.
Rowing right at your targets, fitness is great, stroke is fixed, but you aren't ready. Same shit, different season.

Over the next six months, I am going to do a lot of lying about my rowing, in whatever formats I can dream up.
Corrected for accuracy.

DUThomas
2k Poster
Posts: 297
Joined: August 8th, 2007, 12:28 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by DUThomas » September 1st, 2010, 4:22 pm

KevJGK wrote:Because if you repeatedly say you are going to do something it is not unreasonable for people to expect you to do it.
You reasonably thought that ranger would actually do it? :roll:
David -- 45, 195, 6'1"

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1264886662.png[/img]

KevJGK
2k Poster
Posts: 480
Joined: June 9th, 2009, 3:26 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by KevJGK » September 1st, 2010, 4:39 pm

DUThomas wrote: You reasonably thought that ranger would actually do it? :roll:
I said if you repeatedly say you are going to do something it is not unreasonable for people to expect you to do it.

Personally I dont think ranger will ever post a training result.
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by lancs » September 1st, 2010, 5:22 pm

KevJGK wrote:Personally I dont think ranger will ever post a training result.
I suspect you're right on this. As far as I'm aware, he's never posted a single training/timed result other than his 2ks. I guess now that his 5k, for example, is around the 17:45 mark he won't ever post another as it's just not that impressive. Pretty sad really....

User avatar
Steve G
2k Poster
Posts: 312
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 4:02 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Steve G » September 1st, 2010, 6:47 pm

Worthless piece of crap, if i say I will do something I would at least attempt it, another dns Rich.
Why do people bother trying to assist you when you throw it in their face?
Why should we know believe you will appear at BIRC and WIRC when you will be on public display, your only recent events have been small time with no splits or recorded SPM etc!

Steve
FORUM FLYERS
PBs all 50+ LW
500--1.33.3 / 1K--3.17.9 / 2K--6.55.0 /5K 18.16.2 / 6K 22.05 / 10K--37.43.9 /30m 8034m / HM 1.23.58
UK 65 LW 64Kgs

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » September 1st, 2010, 7:16 pm

Steve G wrote:Worthless piece of crap, if i say I will do something I would at least attempt it, another dns Rich.
That is why you are unsuccessful as a rower, and I am successful.
Steve G wrote: Why do people bother trying to assist you when you throw it in their face?
Who can assist me?

Byron certainly can't.
Steve G wrote:Why should we know believe you will appear at BIRC and WIRC when you will be on public display, your only recent events have been small time with no splits or recorded SPM etc
Believe what you want. I am not going to BIRC and WIRC to be "on public display." I am going to BIRC and WIRC to set the 55s and 60s lwt WRs at a level that will never be bested: 6:16 at 60.

The "public" doesn't have anything to do with it--or my competition.

It is just me and the erg.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » September 1st, 2010, 7:21 pm

KevinJGK wrote: If you don’t want to do a 2K trial today then of course that’s fine. If you never want to do a 2K trial then of course that is also fine.
Really?

Then why is everyone eager to see me post "training results"?

Sounds as though it is not at all O.K.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » September 1st, 2010, 7:24 pm

whp4 wrote:Rowing right at your targets, fitness is great, stroke is fixed, but you aren't ready.
True.

I'm not ready.

I won't be ready for another three months.

When is BIRC?

Ah, yes,

Three months from now.

Oh well.

I guess I'll only be ready in time for BIRC instead of three months early.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » September 1st, 2010, 7:37 pm

o.k., o.k.

No more "intentions," or promises.

I'll just show up and row at BIRC and WIRC.

See you there!

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by mikvan52 » September 1st, 2010, 8:13 pm

ranger wrote:
mikvan52 wrote:(Y)ou never have to worry about it again.
Indeed.

I don't think that those who have mastered a skill need to "worry" about it again.

"Monitoring" isn't worrying.

It is just disciplined action--which is a delight.

Learning a skill is something pretty different from delighting in skillful performance, as all tennis players are painfully aware.

ranger
SO.... Rich
EXPLAIN: Why is the following is an example of mastered perfect rowing form that is both perfect for the erg and transfers well to the water.



You are truly hilarious!

A sculler cannot row this way and move a boat with anything that approaches remarkable speed... Just look at the way your hands have to go over your knees on the recovery :idea: Your blade would be forced into the water... on the recovery... :( :|
You also pause at the release... deadly (on the water) ... ok (on the erg) After all, on the erg there is no equivalent of boat momentum to kill.

Please rest assured that I don't want to criticize your Model D/E erging... But if you put that D or E on slides it would ram the stops... This would show you how ineffective a water stroke you've "perfected"... on the erg.

Another observation:
You do not maintain the paces you claim for any substantial distance on the water.. You approach is to add extra wattage at the catch and hope for the best with inferior technique. Result.. short (inconsequential) bursts of speed.

I know these are harsh words... You deserve them because of your ridiculous claims and faulty observations which you repeat endlessly as if we should think they are facts...

"I am going to BIRC and WIRC to set the 55s and 60s lwt WRs at a level that will never be bested: 6:16 at 60."

Rich. Give it up.
60 yr old lightweights will never erg 6:!6 for 2k ... everyone knows that including you.

mrfit
2k Poster
Posts: 293
Joined: September 19th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by mrfit » September 1st, 2010, 10:11 pm

cute legs though!

Locked