Ranger's training thread
Re: Ranger's training thread
I suspect that PaulS is right.
The most pervasive ill in training for rowing is doing too much low rate rowing.
Only return to low rate rowing when you can do 60min @ 10MPS and your 2K stroking power.
Otherwise, keep doing distance rowing.
Keep the rate up!
ranger
The most pervasive ill in training for rowing is doing too much low rate rowing.
Only return to low rate rowing when you can do 60min @ 10MPS and your 2K stroking power.
Otherwise, keep doing distance rowing.
Keep the rate up!
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 5th, 2010, 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
BTW, both Rocket Roy and Mike VB can do 60min at 10 MPS and their 2K stroking power: 1:51 @ 27 spm (9.5 SPI).
Given this, they should be doing low rate rowing to try to get more stroking power.
The next step on the 10MPS ladder is 1:47 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI).
This suggests that they should both be doing a lot of rowing at low rates and 12.2 SPI.
1:52 @ 20 spm?
In 2003, I did 60min, 1:52 @ 20 spm (12.5 SPI).
ranger
Given this, they should be doing low rate rowing to try to get more stroking power.
The next step on the 10MPS ladder is 1:47 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI).
This suggests that they should both be doing a lot of rowing at low rates and 12.2 SPI.
1:52 @ 20 spm?
In 2003, I did 60min, 1:52 @ 20 spm (12.5 SPI).
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
My goal over the next few months is to row 60min at 10 MPS and 11 SPI.
ranger
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
If I had raced it a few more times, back in 2003, I suspect I could have done 1:47 for 60min..
1:47 for 60min predicts a 1:37/6:28 2K, just what I did.
In pulling that 6:28 2K, I also used a stroking power right around 10.2 SPI.
ranger
1:47 for 60min predicts a 1:37/6:28 2K, just what I did.
In pulling that 6:28 2K, I also used a stroking power right around 10.2 SPI.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
ranger wrote:If I had raced it a few more times, back in 2003, I suspect I could have .....
Kevin
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Age: 57 - Weight: 187 lbs - Height: 5'10"
500m 01:33.5 Jun 2010 - 2K 06:59.5 Nov 2009 - 5K 19:08.4 Jan 2011
Re: Ranger's training thread
BTW, I am doing 90 rpms on my stationary bike (an old Kronos Giant), in the toughest gear, right at 30 mph, according to the gizmo that (supposedly) measures these things.
Good show.
If I can push this biking up to two hours, it will be a considerable load of work, for a cross-training routine.
Deluge of sweat during these stationary bike rides.
Steady breathing, somewhat labored, but regular, steady state, not strained.
I do't know what HR I am running whne I am biking, but I would suspect 150 bpm, low UT1.
ranger
Good show.
If I can push this biking up to two hours, it will be a considerable load of work, for a cross-training routine.
Deluge of sweat during these stationary bike rides.
Steady breathing, somewhat labored, but regular, steady state, not strained.
I do't know what HR I am running whne I am biking, but I would suspect 150 bpm, low UT1.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 5th, 2010, 6:21 am, edited 4 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Wow.
It looks as though training this summer is going to be awesome.
I think I am heading toward 6-hour sessions.
Two hours on the erg, two hours on the bike, and two hours on the water.
If I start around 4 a.m., I can be done at 10 a.m.
ranger
It looks as though training this summer is going to be awesome.
I think I am heading toward 6-hour sessions.
Two hours on the erg, two hours on the bike, and two hours on the water.
If I start around 4 a.m., I can be done at 10 a.m.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I did 1:48 for 60min, just stopping in the middle of a HM trial.KevJGK wrote:ranger wrote:If I had raced it a few more times, back in 2003, I suspect I could have .....
16.7K
Then I did 6:27.5, 6:28, 6:28.5. 6:29, 6:30, 6:32. 6:32, 6:32, 6:32, 6:33, etc., for 2K.
RANKING RESULTS 2003
Indoor Rower | Individual and Race Results | 60 minutes | Men's | All Weight Classes | Custom Age Range (50–60) | 2003 Season
1 rod freed 53 mission viejo ca USA 17132 IND
2 walter krawec 51 St. Catharines On CAN 16725 IND
3 Rich Cureton 51 Ann Arbor MI USA 16692 IND
4 Joe Greco 50 S. Burlington VT USA 16619 IND
5 Risto Ylinen 51 Vantaa FIN 16440 IND
6 dennis hastings 52 evergreen co USA 16382 IND
7 Mike Morschauser 56 Plano TX USA 16258 IND
8 Stu Miller 54 Falmouth ME USA 16191 IND
9 Peter Dreissigacker 51 Stowe VT USA 16162 IND
10 Tom Cleaver 51 Bokeelia FL USA 16152 IND
How old was I?
Just your age, Kev--and a lightweight, twenty-five pounds lighter than you.
So, competitively, the difference in our 2K times at the same age and weight, is about 45 seconds over 2K, 11 seconds per 500m.
You've got some work to do, Kev.
Work to do.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
Your transition times must be very impressive..ranger wrote:I think I am heading toward 6-hour sessions.
Two hours on the erg, two hours on the bike, and two hours on the water.
If I start around 4 a.m., I can be done at 10 a.m.
.. straight off the bike into the single that's just waiting by the dock for you?
Re: Ranger's training thread
The Huron River flows right by my subdivision, a few hundred yards from my house.lancs wrote:Your transition times must be very impressive..ranger wrote:I think I am heading toward 6-hour sessions.
Two hours on the erg, two hours on the bike, and two hours on the water.
If I start around 4 a.m., I can be done at 10 a.m.
.. straight off the bike into the single that's just waiting by the dock for you?
It only takes me a minute to get there and put in.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Ann+A ... de=ADDRESS
I keep my single in my garage, or out in the yard.
I drive it down to the river on my van.
Very quick and easy.
No dock.
I use a boat put in as an access point, right where the railroad tracks cross the river (see the map above).
I just walk my single out into the water and I am off.
It's a 6K loop down river to Barton Dam and back to the put in.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on June 5th, 2010, 12:29 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
I can't wait for the days when he does 6 hours of exercise between the hours of 4am and 10am, but somehow also managed to post here 8 times.
Re: Ranger's training thread
That would be easy.aharmer wrote:I can't wait for the days when he does 6 hours of exercise between the hours of 4am and 10am, but somehow also managed to post here 8 times.
I erg and ride in my garage, a couple of steps from my computer.
I usually do most of my posting while drinking coffee and waking up, before I erg.
It only takes a minute or so to write a post.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
As I have mentioned, this summer, for me, a first slap at a 60min trial would be just an attempt to pb, say, a few meters better than I did in 2003 (1:48, 16.7K), with a HR of about 160 bpm.
That would be pretty impressive, really.
It would indicate that my work on technique over the last eight years has overcome entirely the decline with age from 51 to 59, and then some.
It would also indicate that, at 172 bpm, right at my anaerobic threshold, rather than 160 bpm, a more middlin' UT1 HR, I might well pull my 60min target of 1:44/17.3K.
No 60s lwt has ever pulled 16K for 60min.
ranger
That would be pretty impressive, really.
It would indicate that my work on technique over the last eight years has overcome entirely the decline with age from 51 to 59, and then some.
It would also indicate that, at 172 bpm, right at my anaerobic threshold, rather than 160 bpm, a more middlin' UT1 HR, I might well pull my 60min target of 1:44/17.3K.
No 60s lwt has ever pulled 16K for 60min.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: Ranger's training thread
It might indicate those things, but you have to actually DO the piece before it does so. Probably a good first step for you would be to row an uninterrupted 60 minutes at any pace and stroke rate, as you haven't done one in years.ranger wrote:As I have mentioned, this summer, for me, a first slap at a 60min trial would be just an attempt to pb, say, a few meters better than I did in 2003 (1:48, 16.7K), with a HR of about 160 bpm.
That would be pretty impressive, really.
It would indicate that my work on technique over the last eight years has overcome entirely the decline with age from 51 to 59, and then some.
Re: Ranger's training thread
This isn't true at all.whp4 wrote:Probably a good first step for you would be to row an uninterrupted 60 minutes at any pace and stroke rate, as you haven't done one in years.
I have done lots of uninterrupted 60min rows over the last few years.
I just haven't raced them.
No reason to race until you are ready.
I seem to be pretty close to ready now.
When are you ready to do a 60min trial?
When you are rowing comfortably for sustained distances at 10MPS and your 2K SPI with a steady state HR just below your anaerobic threshold.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)