Guys guys guys...you are making it much too complicated. Farads are a unit of distance approximately 8.998 nanofarads in a kilometer. Inverse square farads are like miles per gallon (or for ergs it tells you how far you can go in a liter of gatorade). You want to express energy per stroke in square coulumbs per square farads. Sure the conversion is a bit harder but once you get used to the numbers it is just as useful as SPI.Tinus wrote:Any unit of energy can be used (calories, joules, etc.). I suggest you use Joule as unit since you also use Watts which is related.Citroen wrote:What units are you measuring "energy per stroke" with? Is that inverse square farads?Tinus wrote:Energy per stroke is very sensible. But, if you don't believe spi has sensible units why mention it?
....
.....
Strokes per minute question
Re: Strokes per minute question
Re: Strokes per minute question
You're a son of a bitch for making my head twist around in order to comprehend that...Nosmo wrote: Guys guys guys...you are making it much too complicated. Farads are a unit of distance approximately 8.998 nanofarads in a kilometer. Inverse square farads are like miles per gallon (or for ergs it tells you how far you can go in a liter of gatorade). You want to express energy per stroke in square coulumbs per square farads. Sure the conversion is a bit harder but once you get used to the numbers it is just as useful as SPI.
24, 166lbs, 5'9
Re: Strokes per minute question
mps is not energy {but wait, let's conveniently ignore reality}John Rupp wrote:.....
but it is ridiculous that you attempt to row with 2/3's more energy in each stroke.
13.3 / 8.0 = 1.66
The top rowers[...] row at 8 mps. Not 13.3 mps.
{but wait, let's conveniently ignore reality}
Re: Strokes per minute question
The trouble with nurd humor is one is usually talking to oneself.bloomp wrote:You're a son of a bitch for making my head twist around in order to comprehend that...
When I saw Citreon write "..Is that inverse square farads?" I burst out laughing, then wondered if I was the only one who found it funny. (BTW there is a mistake in what I wrote, (besides writing 'in a liter' rather then 'on a liter') which you now preserved forever by quoting me, so I'll leave it for now.)
Re: Strokes per minute question
No worries, you're in great company!Nosmo wrote:The trouble with nurd humor is one is usually talking to oneself.bloomp wrote:You're a son of a bitch for making my head twist around in order to comprehend that...
When I saw Citreon write "..Is that inverse square farads?" I burst out laughing, then wondered if I was the only one who found it funny. (BTW there is a mistake in what I wrote, (besides writing 'in a liter' rather then 'on a liter') which you now preserved forever by quoting me, so I'll leave it for now.)
24, 166lbs, 5'9
- Citroen
- SpamTeam
- Posts: 8008
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
Re: Strokes per minute question
Nosmo wrote:The trouble with nurd humor is one is usually talking to oneself.bloomp wrote:You're a son of a bitch for making my head twist around in order to comprehend that...
When I saw Citroen write "..Is that inverse square farads?" I burst out laughing,
You have to blame Bob Spenger for that one. He made me laugh when he first used the inverse sq. farad on here.
- NavigationHazard
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
- Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Re: Strokes per minute question
How about the potzrebie equivalent?
watts/rating = (watts/3.499651)/(rating/49) = (whatmeworries/baker's MAD's). And of course, 1 hah per kovac = 1 whatmeworry....
Then there's (watts/250)/rating = donkeypower/rating = ass index....
watts/rating = (watts/3.499651)/(rating/49) = (whatmeworries/baker's MAD's). And of course, 1 hah per kovac = 1 whatmeworry....
Then there's (watts/250)/rating = donkeypower/rating = ass index....
67 MH 6' 6"
Re: Strokes per minute question
Here's a photo.mikvan52 wrote:I'm not sure what C2's plans are about any further action with their new model..
NavigationHazard and I tried it at the same time at registration for CRASH-B in February.
It slides and is a shorter unit.
The feel is far less abrupt at the catch. I liked it but didn't inspect it very thoroughly...
Will try to find a photo...
The fan unit slides beneath the rail, if I remember correctly
Or, was it the foot stretcher?
The almighty hand of Nav' Haz' is trying (in vain) to get me to loosen up
3 Crash-B hammers
American 60's Lwt. 2k record (6:49) •• set WRs for 60' & FM •• ~ now surpassed
repeat combined Masters Lwt & Hwt 1x National Champion E & F class
62 yrs, 160 lbs, 6' ...
American 60's Lwt. 2k record (6:49) •• set WRs for 60' & FM •• ~ now surpassed
repeat combined Masters Lwt & Hwt 1x National Champion E & F class
62 yrs, 160 lbs, 6' ...
Re: Strokes per minute question
Possibly one of favorite posts of all time.NavigationHazard wrote:How about the potzrebie equivalent?
watts/rating = (watts/3.499651)/(rating/49) = (whatmeworries/baker's MAD's). And of course, 1 hah per kovac = 1 whatmeworry....
Then there's (watts/250)/rating = donkeypower/rating = ass index....
[url=http://www.homestarrunner.com/fhqwhgads.html]fhqwghads[/url]
Re: Strokes per minute question
I like that, but I am having a tough time trying to picture a single floating in a liter of Gatorade. Maybe it could be done if the vessel used to hold the Gatorade were the form used to make the hull of the single. Now the new erg prototype - that's a different matter. The only way I can see to work Gatorade in with that is perhaps to christen one of them with a bottle of the stuff.Nosmo wrote:The trouble with nurd humor is one is usually talking to oneself.bloomp wrote:You're a son of a bitch for making my head twist around in order to comprehend that...
When I saw Citreon write "..Is that inverse square farads?" I burst out laughing, then wondered if I was the only one who found it funny. (BTW there is a mistake in what I wrote, (besides writing 'in a liter' rather then 'on a liter') which you now preserved forever by quoting me, so I'll leave it for now.)
Bob S.
Re: Strokes per minute question
But its easier to row in gatorade then drive in gasoline.Bob S. wrote:I like that, but I am having a tough time trying to picture a single floating in a liter of Gatorade. Maybe it could be done if the vessel used to hold the Gatorade were the form used to make the hull of the single. Now the new erg prototype - that's a different matter. The only way I can see to work Gatorade in with that is perhaps to christen one of them with a bottle of the stuff.
Bob S.
(apologies to all for the thread hijack)
Re: Strokes per minute question
It must be the gatorade version of the waterrower.Bob S. wrote:Now the new erg prototype - that's a different matter. The only way I can see to work Gatorade in with that is perhaps to christen one of them with a bottle of the stuff.