Avast! matey!! 'rrrrrr!ranger wrote:I don't know where you get this stuff from, Mike.mikvan52 wrote:I will not get on the erg again this spring/summer and do 2-5k race pace for some time now. I am OTW and my coach suggests I stay off the erg. I'd be happy to do 60 minute pace though... .for 60 minutes.... You go first!
and I don't handle down... you do!
(snip)
On the erg, I am also quite a bit better than you over 2K.
The two are directly related.
(snip)
Sure, I'll do 60min over the next couple of weeks.
Then we can see what you can do.
(snip)
Then our technique, by and large, will be the same, and any difference in our achievements will be differences in aerobic capacity.
Now high can you rate?
How high can I rate?
If you pull 11 SPI at 135 df., what rate will you shoot for, so that your HR stays below 143 bpm, your anaerobic threshold?
23 spm?
I'll run my HR to 170 bpm, which I think will come out to be about 29 spm.
Pulling 11 SPI in this way, the best young lightweights rate 32 spm, as do the best boats at the Head of the Charles.
Why?
I guess this is what I don't get.
If your aerobic capacity is so substantial, as you keep saying it is, despite your low maxHR, why don't you rate 32 spm for 60min pulling 11 SPI at 135 df., like the best young lightweights?
Doing 11 SPI is not pulling hard at all.
It is just a solid stroke for anyone who knows how to row well.
So technique is not the issue, or anything else skeletal-muscular.
A 60min row of this sort is just a pure test of aerobic capacity.
'rrrrr
So rowing a great hour piece on the erg settles the OTW technique issue?
It took a lotta bluster to get down to the brass tacks:
According to you, "technique is not the issue"
Red Alert! Tug boat w/o a rudder approaching the pier! Collision imminent!
"Not the issue" at all?
(Smash)
One of my points about the two videos above was to indicate how your OTW "technique" matched your erg "technique" I imagine it still does even with implementation of The Rich's Excellent Adventure Training (TREAT)
(Mine does too to a great extent. I don't like that. That's why I moved to the sliders which forces positive changes.)
I repeat: You are a faster erger over 2k (than me): 6 whopping TREAT seconds this year. (we won't go into 2008 if you promise to forget about 2003)
However, I am a racing sculler who has posted sub 2:00/pace results for 5 k and 2:01 avg for between 9 and 10k and 1:50 results for 1k. I surmise from your posts that your times OTW are far slower at these distances at much higher rates than I row.
If you are stronger and technique is not the issue, what is (HERE, ON THE WATER)?
No, it can't be rate. You should be able to match me stroke for stroke because of your superior power at matching rates.
I await your TREAT theory on this.
I await your TREAT lwt 60min row w/o breaks IND_V... Then I'll beat it (w/o TREAT)
(Please don't wait for me to challenge "the young lightweights". I am not young. Evidently you think you are )
I prefer to leave out any answer to the "why not row at 135 df at 32 spm?" I'll answer that once you TREAT us to your lwt 60' IND_V piece.