The Two Types of Training

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 4:57 am

I don't know where this is coming from, and I didn't expect it, but today, my distance rowing pushed up to 32 spm.

Yikes.

That's amazing.

I go 1:38 when I am rating 32 spm.

1:34 @ 37 spm is also feeling as comfortable as can be.

Both of these are right around 11.5 SPI, which is perfect.

So my distance training has now come to a natural plateau.

These two rates and paces will prepare me maximally for all the distance races: 5K, 6K, 30min, 10K, 60min, HM, FM.

For the moment at least, no need to go any faster or rate any higher.

The race pace 500s at 37 spm will prepare me maximally for 5K and 6K.

The distance rowing at 32 spm will prepare me maximally for the longer rows.

Then when I am done with distance trials, I will need to raise the rate to 40 spm on my 500s and do 8 x 500m @ 1:31.

At this stage, I will also need to do 4 x 1K @ 37 spm and 4 x 2K @ 32 spm.

Then I will be ready to race 2K and hit my 2K target.

I'll race at 37 spm.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 5th, 2010, 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 5:05 am

What would an elite young 2x rate in a 1K?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 5:10 am

Hey.

What's up, Mike?

It doesn't look like these guys are rating 26 spm.

And they are going 2K, no?

Not 1K?

40 spm?

Higher?

Yikes.

The start looks like 60 spm.

Are they rating 50 spm through the center of the race?

Quicksdraw on those recoveries, huh?

Gasp.

HR at 200 bpm.

Gasp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjQ7qoys3O0

Wow.

There's that 1:31 500m.

OTW!

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by snowleopard » April 5th, 2010, 5:19 am

ranger wrote:The start looks like 60 spm.
It's 40 off the start. How many fingers does a troll have?

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 5:21 am

snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:The start looks like 60 spm.
It's 40 off the start. How many fingers does a troll have?
Dang.

Looked faster than that.

I'll get my metronome and check it out.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 5:24 am

snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:The start looks like 60 spm.
It's 40 off the start. How many fingers does a troll have?
Nope.

By my metronome, it's 50 spm at the start.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by snowleopard » April 5th, 2010, 5:25 am

ranger wrote:
snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:The start looks like 60 spm.
It's 40 off the start. How many fingers does a troll have?
Dang.

Looked faster than that.

I'll get my metronome and check it out.
Count the strokes in the first 30 seconds of the clip :idea:

It's closer to 40/2. And in case you haven't worked it out, even 50 is less than 60 :idea: :idea:

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 5th, 2010, 5:51 am

Mike--

In a 1K, and in a 2x rather than a 1x, I think we could rate at least 40 spm.

What do you think?

We'll have to try it when I come out East in June.

Are there 2x's around that we could use?

Actually, I'd like to buy one for my cottage in Door County, WI.

Perhaps I can do that before you visit next summer.

If I had a 2x up there, we could have a blast.

There's a lot of big water--which, more often that you'd think, is like glass.

Evenings are often especially nice.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Byron Drachman
10k Poster
Posts: 1124
Joined: March 23rd, 2006, 9:26 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by Byron Drachman » April 5th, 2010, 6:05 am

snowleopard wrote:
ranger wrote:The start looks like 60 spm.
It's 40 off the start. How many fingers does a troll have?
I agree with snowleopard. Around 40 or a little less is what I get using my cadence watch. They settle into the mid 30's during the middle, obviously at a lower rate than the others near them.

JimR
5k Poster
Posts: 544
Joined: March 20th, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by JimR » April 5th, 2010, 6:29 am

ranger wrote:Mike--

In a 1K, and in a 2x rather than a 1x, I think we could rate at least 40 spm.

What do you think? ...
I believe Mike's response to one of your more hilarious observations on OTW rowing was to rescind his 2x offer ... something about your boat-stopping abilities.

It is in this thread ... but since you actually ignore what everyone else is posting you probably missed it.

JimR

mrfit
2k Poster
Posts: 293
Joined: September 19th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by mrfit » April 5th, 2010, 6:45 am

Ranger's Ranking distance countdown:
Days down: 23
Days to go: 26
Rows ranked: 0

User avatar
Rockin Roland
5k Poster
Posts: 570
Joined: March 19th, 2006, 12:02 am
Location: Moving Flywheel

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by Rockin Roland » April 5th, 2010, 6:59 am

At 40 spm the time taken for the recovery should equal the time taken for each stroke. Whereas at a lowly 18 spm the recovery is about 2.5 times that of the stroke.

However Ranger would need to rate 40 spm to keep up with a good sculler rating 18 spm of the same age and weight.
That's because Ranger would be missing water at the catch and washing out at the finish ending up with a rather short stroke through the water. He wouldn't have the skills to get lots of length through the water at a rate of 40 spm.

On the erg I would imagine Ranger would row the same short ineffective strokes. Bad erg habits almost always transfer to the boat. Ranger would be uncoachable on the water because he only listens to himself. So why would anyone want to row in a double scull with somebody like that.
PBs: 2K 6:13.4, 5K 16:32, 6K 19:55, 10K 33:49, 30min 8849m, 60min 17,309m
Caution: Static C2 ergs can ruin your technique and timing for rowing in a boat.
The best thing I ever did to improve my rowing was to sell my C2 and get a Rowperfect.

leadville
2k Poster
Posts: 320
Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
Location: Vermont and Connecticut

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by leadville » April 5th, 2010, 7:40 am

John Rupp wrote:
leadville wrote:rangerboy - you dope, AT is measured w pulse but occurs at the muscular level, and more specifically at the cellular level. It is NOT POSSIBLE to do 20 500s at a HR that peaks at AT at the end of each with a 500m paddle and still produce any splits worthy of considering as a basis for a 2k because the muscle cells will run out of glycogen and ATP, won't get enough O2, and will have a very difficult time processing the excess lactate produced during the previous interval.

Subsequent to the initial 500, the heart rate response will drive the HR up much faster, and that, combined with muscular exhaustion, will result in a continuous decrease in wattage after the first few 500s 'at AT'.

How is it possible for you to be so incredibly ignorant? Do you practice it? Or are you not capable of learning basic exercise physiology?
There is no such thing as AT, so you're blabbing on about a concept that doesn't exist.
perhaps in your mind that's the case, but in minds of those who actually understand exercise physiology, AT does exist. If you want to make a statement like that, you'd better have a lot of evidence to back it up. Until you do, don't embarass yourself.
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b

leadville
2k Poster
Posts: 320
Joined: December 30th, 2009, 10:38 am
Location: Vermont and Connecticut

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by leadville » April 5th, 2010, 7:48 am

Citroen - i'm outta here.

ranger suffers from many tragic conditions, most of all the dread incurable moron disease, and none of us are going to solve his problems. And after Rupp's idiotic comments about vaccines and AT, the pointlessness of this discussion has reached epic levels.
Returned to sculling after an extended absence; National Champion 2010, 2011 D Ltwt 1x, PB 2k 7:04.5 @ 2010 Crash-b

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by NavigationHazard » April 5th, 2010, 7:58 am

I respectfully disagree about how epically silly things are right now. One of the parties in question once argued that it's easier to run 10k races and to erg at altitude (thinner air = less resistance to athlete's motion). He failed to acknowledge that performance actually suffers since there's less available oxygen at altitude. That argument was far sillier.

As for the LW2x race from the Athens Olympics, here's factual data from Kleshnev:

Image

Note r42-42.5 off the start, r35-39 in the middle depending on boat, and trading rate for pace as the finish approached. Note also that the gold went to the Poles, who averaged a whopping 3.8 spm less than the second-place French. According to Kleshnev's analysis, gold medallists at Athens averaged about 1 spm lower than silver medallists, who themselves were about 1 spm lower than bronze winners. Clearly rating higher than your competition does not ipso facto guarantee beating it.
67 MH 6' 6"

Locked