mikvan52 wrote:ranger wrote:Mike--
You seem to think that 5K is something distinct from 2K.
Yes. You are right. 2k is not the same as 5k
in my book.
Why does Michael Sevigny beat Mahe Drysdale at the HOCR when Sevigny cannot hold a candle to Drysdale at 2k? Why has Drysdale not won the HOCR... It may be because he's best suited for the 2k...
Elsewhere in sport:
On the track... Do the same athletes win at 1500 m and 5k?.... (rhetorical question)
(We've been over this many, many times)
As for formulae ("is done at")...
Please provide comprehensive data and provide margins of error...
For all serious ergers with extensive and balanced training, 5K is done at about 2K + 5, +/- 1.
You can't improve your 2K without improving your 5K, and vice versa.
Brian Bailey's 60s lwt WR for 5K is 17:26/1:44.5; his 2K WR is 6:42/1:40.5.
So when he was 60, his spread was 4 seconds per 500m.
He was a 5K guy on the track, so his 5K is very good, given his 2K.
He is still probably more of a runner than a rower.
Back in 2003, my 2K was 1:37; my 5K was 1:43.
So my spread was 6 seconds per 500.
I am the opposite.
I am more of rower than a runner.
I have quite a bit of core and upper body power, in addition to what I can do with my legs.
You can surprise us all, I guess.
But I don't think you are going to do 5K @ 1:39 if you do 2K @ 1:42.5.
To do 5K at 1:39, you'll have to do 2K in and around 1:34.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)