The Two Types of Training

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by mikvan52 » April 3rd, 2010, 7:51 pm

ranger wrote:Mike--

You seem to think that 5K is something distinct from 2K.
Yes. You are right. 2k is not the same as 5k :P in my book. :roll: :roll: :!:

Why does Michael Sevigny beat Mahe Drysdale at the HOCR when Sevigny cannot hold a candle to Drysdale at 2k? Why has Drysdale not won the HOCR... It may be because he's best suited for the 2k...

Elsewhere in sport:
On the track... Do the same athletes win at 1500 m and 5k?.... (rhetorical question)

(We've been over this many, many times)

As for formulae ("is done at")...
Please provide comprehensive data and provide margins of error...

User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by mikvan52 » April 3rd, 2010, 7:57 pm

ranger wrote: You don't get better by racing.

You don't even get good by racing.
Do you mean on the erg only or in all sports?

Aside:
Interesting, too, that Ursula James-Grobler got the 2k WR (Open lwts) w/o either prior racing or training on the erg...... hmmmmmm :idea: :mrgreen:

(I do not count three erg sessions "training"!)
She trained OTW and cross trained x/c skiing etc...

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by johnlvs2run » April 3rd, 2010, 8:24 pm

mikvan52 wrote:out of the bow four I think I compared favorably when looking at watts/kilo.
Haven't you been paying attention?? to the experts on this thread, who say that watts per kilo don't matter!!!

It's how much blubber is on your body that counts!

And being tall is not an advantage!
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by snowleopard » April 3rd, 2010, 8:54 pm

John Rupp wrote:It's how much blubber is on your body that counts!
Guess what SFB, you can be tall, heavy and lean. There are people a foot taller than you with lower bodyfat

:idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:

User avatar
NavigationHazard
10k Poster
Posts: 1789
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:11 pm
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by NavigationHazard » April 3rd, 2010, 9:00 pm

Funny thing too about watts per kilo. Some allegedly "fat" people are a hell of a lot faster than skinny muscle-free runts with delusions of weight-adjusted grandeur. True, some of my weight is because my cojones weigh 30 kilos. Each.

6 x 500m/1' rest, done as a rate ladder: r20/22/24/26/28/30. Results:

Image

01] 1:37.2 r20 381w 19.0 spi
02] 1:35.5 r23 402w 17.4 spi
03] 1:34.3 r24 417w 17.3 spi
04] 1:35.2 r25 406w 16.2 spi :oops: left off a stroke at the end and cost myself
05] 1:33.8 r27 424w 15.7 spi
06] 1:30.3 r31 475w 15.3 spi

3000m (9:26.3 total work time), 1:34.3 average pace, 416w r25. Not at all bad for this kind of rate ladder. I'm especially fond of the last rep.... Back OTW again tomorrow.
67 MH 6' 6"

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by johnlvs2run » April 3rd, 2010, 9:45 pm

snowleopard wrote:you can be tall, heavy and lean
Yes, you sure can. :roll:
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by johnlvs2run » April 3rd, 2010, 9:49 pm

NavigationHazard wrote:Funny thing too about watts per kilo. Some allegedly "fat" people are a hell of a lot faster than skinny muscle-free runts
A 1:37 at 6' 6 and 260 pounds is amazing. :o
Last edited by johnlvs2run on April 3rd, 2010, 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by jliddil » April 3rd, 2010, 9:54 pm

NavigationHazard wrote:Funny thing too about watts per kilo. Some allegedly "fat" people are a hell of a lot faster than skinny muscle-free runts with delusions of weight-adjusted grandeur. T
That me. 178lbs 6'5" Heavy weight delusional. Can barely break 7;55 for 2K.
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

PaulH
6k Poster
Posts: 993
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:03 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by PaulH » April 3rd, 2010, 11:51 pm

That's a lot of replies to my point, ranger, without actually replying to my point: You claim that you and Mike row a 5k at the same pace and HR, except Mike actually rows it, whereas you have the intent of rowing it. Do you see the difference?

User avatar
BrianStaff
2k Poster
Posts: 220
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 2:20 pm
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by BrianStaff » April 4th, 2010, 1:30 am

Today on my bike...I saw 228bpm - I see what ranger sees :shock:

Image
M 65 / 6'3" / 234lbs as of Feb 14, 2008...now 212
Started Rowing: 2/22/2008
Vancouver Rowing Club - Life Member(Rugby Section)
PB: 500m 1:44.0 2K 7:57.1 5K 20:58.7 30' 6866m

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 4th, 2010, 4:17 am

mikvan52 wrote:
ranger wrote:Mike--

You seem to think that 5K is something distinct from 2K.
Yes. You are right. 2k is not the same as 5k :P in my book. :roll: :roll: :!:

Why does Michael Sevigny beat Mahe Drysdale at the HOCR when Sevigny cannot hold a candle to Drysdale at 2k? Why has Drysdale not won the HOCR... It may be because he's best suited for the 2k...

Elsewhere in sport:
On the track... Do the same athletes win at 1500 m and 5k?.... (rhetorical question)

(We've been over this many, many times)

As for formulae ("is done at")...
Please provide comprehensive data and provide margins of error...
For all serious ergers with extensive and balanced training, 5K is done at about 2K + 5, +/- 1.

You can't improve your 2K without improving your 5K, and vice versa.

Brian Bailey's 60s lwt WR for 5K is 17:26/1:44.5; his 2K WR is 6:42/1:40.5.

So when he was 60, his spread was 4 seconds per 500m.

He was a 5K guy on the track, so his 5K is very good, given his 2K.

He is still probably more of a runner than a rower.

Back in 2003, my 2K was 1:37; my 5K was 1:43.

So my spread was 6 seconds per 500.

I am the opposite.

I am more of rower than a runner.

I have quite a bit of core and upper body power, in addition to what I can do with my legs.

You can surprise us all, I guess.

But I don't think you are going to do 5K @ 1:39 if you do 2K @ 1:42.5.

:D :D

To do 5K at 1:39, you'll have to do 2K in and around 1:34.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 4th, 2010, 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 4th, 2010, 4:34 am

BTW, a great training game that I am starting to play now, and will be playing from now on until WIRC 2011, is what might be called "aerobic 500s."

In a 2K, I think most of us would like to stay aerobic for about 500m.

So, if you wear a heart rate monitor and do 500s, a nice pace to find for training is just the pace that lets you get to the end of a 500m interval when your HR reaches your anaerobic threshold.

If you are careful not to go over your anaerobic threshold and you take pretty generous rest (e.g., paddle a 500m in between), you should be able to do these 500s for an hour and a half--20 x 500m.

This session is a good litmus test for your race pace, I think.

20 x 500m (paddle a 500m in between) is done at 2K.

Over the next month or so, I think I will get to 20 x 500m @ 1:34, rating about 37 spm.

That's about 11.5 SPI

If Mike VB did 500s at 1:42.5, his 2K race pace, I think he would find that his HR would reach his anaerobic threshold, 143 bpm, at the end of each 500m interval.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 4th, 2010, 4:48 am, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 4th, 2010, 4:37 am

BrianStaff wrote:Today on my bike...I saw 228bpm - I see what ranger sees :shock:

Image
Cool.

If your maxHR is 228 bpm, then your anaerobic threshold should be about 185 bpm.

Can you row bike for a couple of hours with a HR of 185 bpm?

Try it and see what happens.

What is your resting HR?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 4th, 2010, 5:52 am

PaulH wrote:That's a lot of replies to my point, ranger, without actually replying to my point: You claim that you and Mike row a 5k at the same pace and HR, except Mike actually rows it, whereas you have the intent of rowing it. Do you see the difference?
My 5K pb, actually rowed, is 17:10.

My project has been to get (considerably) better.

We'll soon see if I have been successful.

The 60s lwt WR for 5K is 17:26.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 4th, 2010, 5:57 am

mikvan52 wrote:Interesting, too, that Ursula James-Grobler got the 2k WR (Open lwts) w/o either prior racing or training on the erg...... hmmmmmm
But, equally interesting, you didn't.

Your WIRC time was eight seconds slower than the _60s_ lwt WR, a dozen seconds slower than the 55s lwt WR.

Eight seconds is a _huge_ margin in a 2K.

A dozen seconds is ridiculous.

Seven boat lengths?

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Locked