The Two Types of Training

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 9:34 am

lancs wrote:It's time for me to leave this thread for a while as it's clear that you have no intention whatsoever of posting any of your alleged distance trials this year or any other.
Well, that's my intention, but if I don't, who cares.

I'll just keep rowing, 1:43 @ 29 spm, day in and day out, year in and year out.

Great training.

I am already the best 55s lwt erger--by far.

Next year, I will be 60.

No 60s erger this year came within 20 seconds of my 2K this year, even though I didn't even prepare for it.

Sharpening alone will get me a dozen more seconds.

I think this distance rowing, 1:43 @ 29 spm, will get me another dozen.

That brings the full count of my 2K next year compared to other 60s lwts to about 45 seconds.

That's a lot.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 9:39 am

aharmer wrote:Are you disputing the fact that your monitor records what you do on a daily basis?
Indeed I do.

The PM4 has no way to record work on relaxation and habituation, or effectiveness and efficiency, as it is done in training.

It can only record the _result_ of this training, once this work is complete.

But that result is not the record of the training itself.

The training can take weeks and weeks, months and months, or even years and years.

The PM4 reading of time over distance rowed is the record of a race.

Different matter entirely.

If you just race your training, you do no training at all, no work on relaxation and habituation, effectiveness and efficiency.

So you never improve.

You just get worse.

Racing does nothing at all to improve your 2K.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 1st, 2010, 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
chgoss
10k Poster
Posts: 1060
Joined: March 25th, 2006, 1:38 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by chgoss » April 1st, 2010, 9:43 am

ranger wrote:
aharmer not chgoss wrote:If we're all so wrong about what you're doing then post it.
Post what?

...
Rich: what is the problem with misattributing posts???? Are you intentionally doing this?

I did not post that, please change it to aharmer :roll: :roll: :roll:
52 M 6'2" 200 lbs 2k-7:03.9
1 Corinthians 15:3-8

User avatar
chgoss
10k Poster
Posts: 1060
Joined: March 25th, 2006, 1:38 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by chgoss » April 1st, 2010, 9:50 am

ranger wrote:
aharmer wrote:Are you disputing the fact that your monitor records what you do on a daily basis?
Indeed I do. The PM4 has no way to record work on relaxation and habituation, or effectiveness and efficiency, as it is done in training.
If all those gains in relaxation, habituation, "rhythmicity", etc.. dont result in covering more distance in the same time/SPM of what benefit is it?

Are you looking for style points?
52 M 6'2" 200 lbs 2k-7:03.9
1 Corinthians 15:3-8

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by jliddil » April 1st, 2010, 10:00 am

NavigationHazard wrote: That's because anyone trying it won't be standing for very long. They'll be horizontal, being pumped full of embalming fluid....
My point exactly. :twisted:
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

PaulH
6k Poster
Posts: 993
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 10:03 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Contact:

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by PaulH » April 1st, 2010, 10:04 am

ranger wrote: When I am doing 1:43 @ 29 spm, my HR is stably below my anaerobic threshold.

When I am fully trained up for it, I can row a HM at my anaerobic threshold.
Wrong. If your HR really is stably below your AT, then you should be able to row a HM at AT today. If you can't, it's because your HR *isn't* stable at that level. One or the other can be true, but not both.

User avatar
jliddil
6k Poster
Posts: 717
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 11:44 am
Location: North Haven, CT

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by jliddil » April 1st, 2010, 10:21 am

ranger wrote: When I am doing 1:43 @ 29 spm, my HR is stably below my anaerobic threshold.

When I am fully trained up for it, I can row a HM at my anaerobic threshold.
Rice University:
"The AT, also known as the lactate threshold, is the point where lactate (lactic acid) begins to accumulate in the bloodstream."

Concept2
"The anaerobic threshold (AT) (also called the lactate threshold) is the level of exertion where your body must switch from aerobic metabolism to anaerobic metabolism."

So you are saying you can do a HM while accumulating lactic acid from the first stroke? Amazing
JD
Age: 51; H: 6"5'; W: 172 lbs;

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by lancs » April 1st, 2010, 10:25 am

ranger wrote:I am already the best 55s lwt erger--by far
..other than Roy Brook, the current WR holder.

Had to break my leave from this thread to ensure that the occasional shred of fact makes it through..

User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by mikvan52 » April 1st, 2010, 10:50 am

ranger wrote:I am already the best 55s lwt erger--by far
..other than Roy Brook, the current WR holder.

and in the current year?
the following list includes lightweights :? :? :?

As the year draws to a close: I'd like to acknowledge those who did pieces and logged them.

I don’t think that the list will change much. We’ll see. I’ll save this to a Word file and update it on May 1.



Highlights of Distance Rowing in the 2010 year
for 50-59 men divisions 5k, 10k,30', 60'



Image
5k lights
now winning
50-54 = Greg Trahar
55-59 = Bob Willis

Image
10k lights
now winning
50-54 = Greg Trahar
55-59 = Michael van Beuren

Image
30 min lights
now winning
50-54 = Steve Geary
55-59 = Michael van Beuren

Image
60 min lights
now winning
50-54 = Greg Trahar
55-59 = Michael van Beuren

Image
5k heavies
now winning
50-54 = Steve Krum
55-59 = James Crawford

Image
10k heavies
now winning
50-54 = Steve Krum
55-59 = George Perrin

Image
30 min heavies
now winning
50-54 = Steve Krum
55-59 = Steve Roedde

Image
60 min lheavies
now winning
50-54 = James Crawford
55-59 = Steve Roedde

Two questions:
1. How many leaders in the rankings at 500,1k & 2k are also on the list above?
2. “Where’s Waldo?”

Image
3 Crash-B hammers
American 60's Lwt. 2k record (6:49) •• set WRs for 60' & FM •• ~ now surpassed
repeat combined Masters Lwt & Hwt 1x National Champion E & F class
62 yrs, 160 lbs, 6' ...

User avatar
BrianStaff
2k Poster
Posts: 220
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 2:20 pm
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by BrianStaff » April 1st, 2010, 10:52 am

chgoss wrote:
Rich: what is the problem with misattributing posts???? Are you intentionally doing this?

I did not post that, please change it to aharmer :roll: :roll: :roll:
He has done that at least 4 times over the last week or so. I wonder what technique he is using to cut/paste quotes because he's getting wrong on too many occasions.

One can speculate what the prof would say if his students did that.
M 65 / 6'3" / 234lbs as of Feb 14, 2008...now 212
Started Rowing: 2/22/2008
Vancouver Rowing Club - Life Member(Rugby Section)
PB: 500m 1:44.0 2K 7:57.1 5K 20:58.7 30' 6866m

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 10:53 am

lancs wrote:
ranger wrote:I am already the best 55s lwt erger--by far
..other than Roy Brook, the current WR holder.

Had to break my leave from this thread to ensure that the occasional shred of fact makes it through..
Roy hasn't been the best 55s erger for two years.

Right now, at 58, like Mike VB, he would struggle with 6:50, if he were rowing at all.

When my training is complete, I'll be _waaaay_ under 6:38.

I'm in no rush.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 10:58 am

mikvan52 wrote:As the year draws to a close
There is a full month left in the indoor rowing season.

_Lots_ of time, both to train and do trials.

If you do two sessions a day, as many do, that's 60 sessions.

Outside of the FM, it only takes 15min-75min to do a distance trial.

And there are only six distances--5K, 6K, 30min, 10K, 60min, HM.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 11:03 am

PaulH wrote:if your HR really is stably below your AT, then you should be able to row a HM at AT today.
Sure, if I were rowing a full HM right now at my anaerobic threshold.

That is what I am working toward in my distance rowing.

When I get there, sure, that's what will happen.

My heart rate has been coming up nicely.

If I row 1:43 @ 29 spm, it comes right up.

So, that's what I will try to do as much as possible from now on--for longer and longer periods.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on April 1st, 2010, 1:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
Citroen
SpamTeam
Posts: 8008
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:28 pm
Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by Citroen » April 1st, 2010, 11:09 am

aharmer wrote: Unless you have some method of turning off the monitor so it will not record, there is a record of what you do.
Simple to do that, pull the 2.5mm (3/32″) TSR jack from the bottom of the PM4 and it won't show anything, not a sausage, bugger all. (It's kind of like the amount of useful information in a Ranger posting.)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: The Two Types of Training

Post by ranger » April 1st, 2010, 11:11 am

mikvan52 wrote:I'd like to acknowledge those who did pieces and logged them.
Why?

They are already "acknowledged" in the rankings.

And this is a training thread.

Racing doesn't have anything to do with training.

So "acknowledging" them here is both superfluous and inappropriate.

What is important for training is to know how these folks remained so slow even though they trained hard.

:D :D

Then we could avoid that type of training and consider better alternatives.

Science also progresses, for the most part, by eliminating dead ends.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

Locked