JimR wrote:
This appears confusing as you have slowed more than any 55-59 lwt in the history of erging.
No, not at all.
The 6:41 I pulled this year, without distance trials or hard sharpening, was pretty much right in line with expectations, given my lwt 6:30 at WIRC 2003, when I set the 50s lwt WR
Perhaps a second better.
Historically, the best 50s lwt fall off at the rate of 1.7 seconds per year, so 11.9 seconds in the seven years from 2003 to 2010.
This means that any improvement at all that I can make on this 6:41 with distance trials and hard sharpening over the next year, as I bring this training to completion, will be beyond the normal historical expectations.
6:28 would be a dozen seconds beyond these expectations.
6:16 would be _two_ dozen seconds beyond these expectations.
I usually get a dozen seconds over 2K from hard sharpening.
Distrance trials (and other kinds of "threshold" and AT rowing) are also a crucial part of training for a 2K.
The 6:41 I pulled this year is a second faster than the 60s lwt WR, just as the 6:30 I pulled in 2003 was a second faster than the 50s lwt WR at the time.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)