Indeed you are.mikvan52 wrote: am the fastest lwt american 55-59 sculler
That's why we'll all be gunning for you.
If you can't rate up...
ranger
Indeed you are.mikvan52 wrote: am the fastest lwt american 55-59 sculler
ranger wrote:Indeed you are.mikvan52 wrote: am the fastest lwt american 55-59 sculler
That's why we'll all be gunning for you.
If you can't rate up...
ranger
mikvan52 wrote:I row faster than that and I'm 57!
John Rupp wrote:RANKING RESULTS 2003
Rod freed 53 mission viejo ca USA 16:47.0
RANKING RESULTS 2010
Henry Baker 62 Santa Barbara CA USA 18:25.7 RowPro
2 Photo Email this rower gregory brock 61 santa cruz ca USA 18:27.9 IND
3 Email this rower Bob Willis 59 Longmeadow Ma USA 18:30.6 IND
4 Photo Email this rower Rolf Meek 59 Oslo NOR 18:42.9 IND
5 Email this rower Hugh Conway 60 St. Pats TOW Club IRL 18:43.1
Mike -- ? absent
mikvan52 wrote:What are Freed's rowing times, JOHN? (not his erg times)
No evidence for this at all.mikvan52 wrote:I will always beat ranger on the water
Hardly.mikvan52 wrote:He changed this form and slowed down. His form remains WRONG.
That amounts to a lot of meters, no?mikvan52 wrote:He would have done lots of low rate, lots of drills, lots of time OTW.
Over the next five weeks, I think I will best my 16.7K 60min row from 2003 pretty soundly and pull well over 17K, even though I am now seven years older.auerll wrote:I think Rich´s 16690m hour (probably not done at weight) which he pulled when he (still) was extremely fit and used a not very nice but very efficient technique is not far from the maximum 50+ year old lightweights (at weight ) can achieve. I do not believe in 17k+ efforts.
Where are the remaining 47?Ranger wrote:March 12, 2010: Sure, standing ab-wheels are harder, but not as hard as extension press ups. I could do 50 of them, I think. But that would be about it.
You want to see 50?Byron Drachman wrote:
Where are the remaining 47?Ranger wrote:March 12, 2010: Sure, standing ab-wheels are harder, but not as hard as extension press ups. I could do 50 of them, I think. But that would be about it.
Make sure it's verified. We wouldn't want you sneaking in any more "Just Rows" claimed as continuous.ranger wrote:Over the next five weeks, I think I will best my 16.7K 60min row from 2003 pretty soundly and pull well over 17K, even though I am now seven years older.
Sure, I'll do it IND_V and post a screen shot, too, with splits, rates, and heart rates, which should be interesting.snowleopard wrote:Make sure it's verified. We wouldn't want you sneaking in any more "Just Rows" claimed as continuous.ranger wrote:Over the next five weeks, I think I will best my 16.7K 60min row from 2003 pretty soundly and pull well over 17K, even though I am now seven years older.
Rich, you're supposed to keep your body straight, and off the ground at all times.ranger wrote:Here are three or four standing ab-wheels.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DjbUepLvsE
ranger
You link contained no evidence I could see. So I ask again, on what basis do you make your assertion?John Rupp wrote:PaulH wrote:on what basis do you say that most rowers in this country try to bully their way through the water?http://www.c2forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=131057#p131057a quick catch feels "easier" than a big "weightlifting-type" slug at the catch, but the quick catch lets me go faster
Most rowers use a huge weightlifting-type slug at the catch.
They insist on banging their heads against the wall on the water.
But the top rowers, Stephanen, Luini, Ebbesen, row like Freed.
Or at least avoid pushing off with your knees so blatantly.John Rupp wrote:
Rich, you're supposed to keep your body straight, and off the ground at all times.
The link works fine for me and supports the quotation that I posted.PaulH wrote:You link contained no evidence I could see.