The Two Types of Training
- Rocket Roy
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 338
- Joined: October 16th, 2006, 3:59 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Two Types of Training
Mike he will never race you on the water, ever. he wuld be totally and utterly defeated, just like everytime I race him on the erg.
Lwt 55+ World Record Holder 6.38.1 (2006-2018)
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
Re: The Two Types of Training
Mike,
a lot of those events you mentioned involved boats and oars. What were you thinking? That's not rowing! Rowing is what ranger does in his basement, or occasionally at some high school gymnasium, when not too many people are watching. Try not to make this mistake again, okay?
a lot of those events you mentioned involved boats and oars. What were you thinking? That's not rowing! Rowing is what ranger does in his basement, or occasionally at some high school gymnasium, when not too many people are watching. Try not to make this mistake again, okay?
Re: The Two Types of Training
And just where is this "ranked" piece? I looked as far back as the online records show and it's not there. Seems to be nothing more than the imaginary wolf, as usual.ranger wrote:Not true.kini62 wrote:No you won't. You never have
My best ranked piece for 60min is 16.7K.
I am now working on the technical skills I need to improve on that.
ranger
Gene
59m, 5'6" 160lbs, rowing and skiing (pseudo) on the Big Island of Hawaii.
Re: The Two Types of Training
In the interest of accuracy, you might check out 2003. It was 8 meters short of the quoted distance, but that is not significant when rounding it off to the nearest tenth of a kilometer. I didn't check any of the later years. The page shows only 2005-2010, but the scroll down goes to 2002, another year for which there is a ranking of well over 16 km.kini62 wrote:And just where is this "ranked" piece? I looked as far back as the online records show and it's not there. Seems to be nothing more than the imaginary wolf, as usual.ranger wrote:Not true.kini62 wrote:No you won't. You never have
My best ranked piece for 60min is 16.7K.
I am now working on the technical skills I need to improve on that.
ranger
Gene
Bob S.
Re: The Two Types of Training
That "16.7k" was also done as a heavyweight, though no doubt there will be claims that it wasn't.
Re: The Two Types of Training
You can race on the erg whenever you want, Roy.Rocket Roy wrote:Mike he will never race you on the water, ever. he wuld be totally and utterly defeated, just like everytime I race him on the erg.
So why not?
Show us what you can do.
Your pb is pretty out of date.
You can race OTW whenever you want, too.
Nothing mysterious about racing.
You just time yourself.
Any sort of sprint interval workout is really a mini-race, no?
It's not hard to tell how fast you are going, anyway.
You don't even need a clock.
You just check your wake and the roar of the wind in your ears.
Yep, the one time we raced head-to-head, almost five years ago now, you pulled, what, 6:45?
Nice win.
Congrats.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on March 14th, 2010, 9:37 am, edited 5 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: The Two Types of Training
Yes, I was a heavyweight at the time, but not by much.whp4 wrote:That "16.7k" was also done as a heavyweight, though no doubt there will be claims that it wasn't.
That year, I raced 2K as a lightweight seven times, including all of the major championships internationally.
6:36, 6:33, 6:30 (WIRC), 6:32. 6:29, 6:28 (BIRC), 6:32 (EIRC)
Pretty consistent racing, I would say.
Three of these 2Ks were WR rows.
Two were just .4 seconds off the old WR.
One was 1.4 seconds off the old WR.
The 6:36 was a first race of the winter, a month before WIRC, when I was just getting into my winter sharpening.
I rowed six seconds better a month later at WIRC, when I was fully sharpened.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: The Two Types of Training
When I am doing distance rowing, I like to eliminate the roll up onto my toes at the catch and therefore the first two beats of the drive, when I push off the balls of my feet and roll back to my heels.
The drive of this stroke, then, is shorter and sharper, lifting the ratio to over 4-to-1 (13/3).
The rhythm of the stroke cycle is still the same.
I still do the stroke cycle right on a beat, duple time, in a four-beat measure, 16 pulses to a measure.
Just the gestures on the last two pulses of the recovery and the first two pulses of the drive are elided.
I rest at the catch for four more pulses than I normally do when I am using my full stroke.
These elisions shorten the drive time by 40%, from 5/16 to 3/16 of the stroke cycle.
Given the shortening, this distance stroke is weaker than my full stroke by about 2 SPI, but because the big push with my legs, with heels set, plus the explosive swing of my back and finish with my arms, is still there, I can still get plenty of power for distance rowing.
1:43 @ 29 spm (10 MPS, 11 SPI) comes along just fine.
I don't know, but using this stroke, I think I am going to do 1:43 @ 29 spm for a HM.
This stroke is _very_ efficient.
Back in 2003, 1:43 was my 5K pace.
HM is done at 5K + 6.
So, if I can pull this off, it would be an improvement of six seconds per 500m over a HM vis-a-vis my former self in 2003, when I didn't know how to row.
I have given up rowing at max drag.
This is also helping my quickness and efficiency.
I am now rowing at 145 df.
ranger
The drive of this stroke, then, is shorter and sharper, lifting the ratio to over 4-to-1 (13/3).
The rhythm of the stroke cycle is still the same.
I still do the stroke cycle right on a beat, duple time, in a four-beat measure, 16 pulses to a measure.
Just the gestures on the last two pulses of the recovery and the first two pulses of the drive are elided.
I rest at the catch for four more pulses than I normally do when I am using my full stroke.
These elisions shorten the drive time by 40%, from 5/16 to 3/16 of the stroke cycle.
Given the shortening, this distance stroke is weaker than my full stroke by about 2 SPI, but because the big push with my legs, with heels set, plus the explosive swing of my back and finish with my arms, is still there, I can still get plenty of power for distance rowing.
1:43 @ 29 spm (10 MPS, 11 SPI) comes along just fine.
I don't know, but using this stroke, I think I am going to do 1:43 @ 29 spm for a HM.
This stroke is _very_ efficient.
Back in 2003, 1:43 was my 5K pace.
HM is done at 5K + 6.
So, if I can pull this off, it would be an improvement of six seconds per 500m over a HM vis-a-vis my former self in 2003, when I didn't know how to row.
I have given up rowing at max drag.
This is also helping my quickness and efficiency.
I am now rowing at 145 df.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on March 14th, 2010, 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: The Two Types of Training
BTW, if I maintain the 11 SPI drive of this shortened distance stroke, with heels set, but do the stroke in double time, at 56 spm rather than 28 spm, with only eight rather than 16 pulses to the stroke cycle, with the legs on the downbeat rather than buried in the measure on the third pulse, I am in something close to a 5/3, 1.7-to-1, golden-section ratio, pulling 605 watts, 1:23.5 pace.
1.1 seconds per stroke, .7 seconds on the recovery, .4 seconds on the drive.
Pretty nice stroke for 500m, no?
Danish lightweight racing stroke?
ranger
1.1 seconds per stroke, .7 seconds on the recovery, .4 seconds on the drive.
Pretty nice stroke for 500m, no?
Danish lightweight racing stroke?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: The Two Types of Training
Well, so far this year, that's what the _facts_ are, if you are interested in the facts, rather than just blowing a lot of hot air.mikvan52 wrote:Well, I guess this makes you far superior to me
RANKING RESULTS 2010
Indoor Rower | Individual and Race Results | 2000m | Men's | Lightweight | Custom Age Range (55–59) | Current 2010 Season
You are number 1 of 101
View your Ranking
1 Rich Cureton 59 Ann Arbor MI USA 6:41.4 RACE
2 Michael van Beuren 57 Hartland VT USA 6:47.6 IND_V
This is certainly to be expected, though.
I have lowered an erg WR by four seconds.
On the erg, you have never come much closer than two seconds per 500m of a WR.
This might have be be considered, too:
I think I might be _much_ better over 2K by the end of April, hopefully well under the 55s lwt WR, perhaps under the 50s lwt WR, too.
I pulled the 6:41 at Cleveland with no substantial sharpening, heck, without even finishing my distance rowing, including distance trials,
Over the next six weeks, I will be working hard to try to get more fully trained.
Will you be better over 2K by the end of April?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Re: The Two Types of Training
Ranger's ranking distance trials countdown:
48 days
48 days
Re: The Two Types of Training
Let's not forget your most recent effort, which clearly shows the trajectory of your "improvement":
You pulled the 2k in Detroit without even finishing
You pulled the 2k in Detroit without even finishing
Re: The Two Types of Training
I think I will be quite a bit better at normal drag, with distance trials, and sharpened.whp4 wrote:Let's not forget your most recent effort, which clearly shows the trajectory of your "improvement":
You pulled the 2k in Detroit without even finishing
6:41 at max drag, no distance trials, unsharpened.
Distance trials will tell the story, even before sharpening.
1:43 for a HM predicts a 6:08 2K, etc.
The 60s lwt WR for a HM is 1:54.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on March 14th, 2010, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
Re: The Two Types of Training
ranger wrote:I think I will be quite a bit better at normal drag, with distance trials, and sharpened.whp4 wrote:Let's not forget your most recent effort, which clearly shows the trajectory of your "improvement":
You pulled the 2k in Detroit without even finishing
6:41 at max drag, no distance trials, unsharpened.
Distance trials will tell the story, even before sharpening.
1:43 for a HM predicts a 6:08 2K, etc.
ranger
on February 10th, 2010, 8:17 am, ranger wrote: I would admit that work on basic fitness, cross-training, foundational rowing, and technique are hard to evaluate realistically because of how far they are removed from racing, but--happily--I am no longer in that place at all.
I am doing distance rowing and sharpening.
I no longer do foundational rowing.
I am at weight; so cross-training is now dispensable.l
I now row well (13 SPI). I no longer have to work on technique and stroking power.
Heck, I have even done six months or so of distance rowing, slowly building the rate up to 10 MPS and 29 spm, 30 spm, or even 31 spm--1:43 @ 28 spm (11 SPI); 1:40 @ 30 spm (11.7 SPI), 1:37 @ 31 spm (12.4 SPI)-- so that the cadences are smooth and relaxed.
So the only thing remaining is the reality-testing.
So, it is getting to be time to test reality, no?
Wish me luck!
ranger
Re: The Two Types of Training
Yes.
I no longer do foundational rowing.
I am now getting ready for distance trials.
These distance trials will be my first reality testing, because I will be fully trained to race them.
My 2K races this year didn't test any reality.
Sure, I pulled WR pace for my age and weight, but I wasn't fully trained to race them.
ranger
I no longer do foundational rowing.
I am now getting ready for distance trials.
These distance trials will be my first reality testing, because I will be fully trained to race them.
My 2K races this year didn't test any reality.
Sure, I pulled WR pace for my age and weight, but I wasn't fully trained to race them.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)