mikvan52 wrote:Rich: Do you think resting is part of good training? Should one rest for several (non-consecutive) days out of the week?
I should share too: that I am not resting at
2k pace + 17 to 21 seconds and I am at 20 strokes per minute.
Do you call a pace like that (which for me or any other decent rower is 80% effort ) resting?
I am unable to characterize it as such. When I do such a workout for 45-80 minutes.. It's real work
{edit}
So: It was time for my evening workout. Happenstance: "easy rowing"
20' just to loosen up for a interval session tomorrow
111 drag factor
on slides (to enhance the OTW feel of good rowing)
20:00 - 4953m - 2:01.1 pace - 19 spm
Low hr... No monitor worn but probably in the 60-70% range of HRR
By the way: THese are VERIFIED HRR levels not ("I suppose my max is")
Is this a useless workout, to be scorned by the well trained 50+ rower?
No.... IMHO, it's extremely useful;
#1 It works neural pathways so that you can continue to row well at higher spm.
#2 It is not something reserved just for building one's base
#3 It is therapeutic for flushing out residual toxins from prior hard workouts.
IOW it is not simply "REST" it is restful training a required element.
If and when an erger goes on the water there is even more of it,... doing drills and such..
How many ergers "drill" for form on the erg? Fess- up!
I'll start:
I confess I hate to "drill" OTErg... How dreary!!
But... it's good for your rowing... Low rate stuff is a good substitute for formal drills because it lets you slow down and feel what is happening.
This needs to be done throughout one's rowing career.
Do not think that I am saying that all ergers should row as if they will have to move a boat. TO the contrary: Do what you like... But please do not say that Low Rate stuff is needed by NO ONE training for 2k.
Or just for rest...
I repeat (you are not listening), if you already row well, and are not just resting, keep the rate up.
Do you row well?
Rowing well is 13 SPI for lighweights; 16 SPI for heavyweights.
You are a lightweight.
So, sure, you can benefit enormously by rowing _all_ your meters at 20 spm and 13 SPI, until you row well.
13 SPM at 20 spm is 1:50 @ 20 spm, or heck, 1:47 @ 22 spm.
For you, we don't disagree at all about low rate rowing.
In fact, our disagreement goes the other way.
I think you should do _all_ your rowing at low rates--for years and years (as I did).
Until you row well.
But....
When you row well, there will no longer be any need.
As John (Rupp) so rightly claims, rowing at low rates is not an efficient production of power.
It is trudging.
You can't learn to row your best if you are just trudging all the time.
If anything, rowing is a rhythmical production of power.
PaulS is exactly right, I think, that the essence of the affair if feeling the right ratio to use in order to be maximally efficient.
I also think that he is right that this ratio, for everyone, is right around 10 MPS.
So, if you already are effective in your rowing, just row at 10 MPS up to the limits of how hard you would like to work.
Don't waste your time being inefficient, working on improving your effectiveness, which doesn't need improvement.
What needs improvement, what _always_ needs improvement in rowing, once you know how to row well, if your efficiency, learning, better and better, how to glide along producing power effortlessly by locking into the most efficient ratio for the level of work you are doing.
If you are a lightweight and can pull 13 SPI at low rates for miles and miles with just a natural stroke, you don't need to work on stroking power .
Right now, Eskild is pulling 10.5 SPI in a 2K.
But since he can pull 39 spm, he can row under 6:20 for 2K.
Almost no lightweights can row under 6:20 for 2K.
How do you get so that you can row like this?
Learn to row well (13 SPI).
Then learn to row efficiently (10 MPS) up to the limits of your aerobic capacity over long distances.
NB!!!!!
13 SPI @ 10 MPS is 1:34 @ 32 spm
12.4 SPI @ 10 MPS is 1:37 @ 31 spm
11.7 SPI @ 10 MPS is 1:40 @ 30 spm
11 SPI @ 10 MPS is 1:43 @ 29 spm
For you, it is an enormous labor to pull 13 SPI.
When you are rowing well, you are killing yourself.
So, sure, you should still be working on effectiveness--hard.
In fact, if you are ambitious about your rowing, I think you should be working at it all the time.
You are not yet rowing effectively.
And why try to be efficient if you are ineffective?
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)