snowleopard wrote:No, I mean why in your shirtless video nasty is your body heading south?
You seem to be deaf and blind.
As erg times reflect, most bodies go south at about 30.
Next year I'll be 60.
Not much to be done about making a 60-year-old body look like a 20-year-old body, if that's what you think I should look like.
At the moment, my concern is much more with rate than weight.
Given my stroking power now, if I can pull 36 spm for 2K, I'll row 6:16.
Weight is irrelevant to that.
That breaks the 55s hwt WR by 2 seconds; the 60s hwt WR by 6 seconds.
I am very comfortable at 36 spm.
Given my size, that's my normal race rate when I am fully trained.
That's what I rated for 2K back in 2003.
So it's time to get excited and let it rip.
If I row a lwt 6:16 at 60, the question will not "why am I so flabby" but "how did a flabby 60-year-old man row under the lightweight erg standard for the US National Team and, at the same time, faster than any lightweight beyond their 30s."
Or this:
"How did a male WR-holder, 40-70, train himself to be so much better after so many years, when, up until now, all male WR-holders, 40-70, have only gotten worse--and then much worse--and then, much, much worse?"
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)