This is again nonsens. This season has nothing to do with it. Althoug he now says that he will pay after this season.ranger wrote:If the times I log in the various races this year fall well short of my targets, even though I am fully trained.KevJGK wrote:In all seriousness, under what circumstances would you concede that hjs has won the bet?ranger wrote: Over the next couple of week, I think I do it for 20K and win my bet with hjs.
I haven't done any races yet.
ranger
I will again open a thread to tell the simple facts
Ranger has made 3 bet's 2 with me and one small one with Roy Brook.
The one with Roy was simple, he has to show up at Wirc and weigh in ass a lightweight to win. This was for 20 dollars. He did not weigh in at all so this one he lost.
The second one was a bet about last season. It was about his 2k that year, it has 2 sides, the one side was about 2000 dollars, if he rowed a 6.16 2k I would have lost and had to pay him 2k.
The other side was him being slower than 6.40, If that was to be case I would have won and he should to pay me 1000 $
This was for season 2008/09, last season.
The outcome was clear, although ranger did very well for his age in my view he did not go sub 6.40 so I won.
He admited that fact and begged me to have mercy and give him a change to win his debt back. This is not made up he really begged! it was quite embarrising seing a grown man doing that
So I told him: "you have lost this one so you have to pay me, but I will offer you the change to win you money back and even double it. If you at any time during the rest of his life erg any one of your goals I will pay you 2000 dollars".
So in short, he ows 1020 dollars and refuses to pay up.
And if he does what is saying I will pay him 2k