Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
6:28 2K
- hjs
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 10076
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
- Location: Amstelveen the netherlands
KevJGK wrote:Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
Yep.KevJGK wrote:Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
If you do this, your competitive status as a rower, your 2K time, comes down to one thing:
What is your 2K SPI?
For instance, Mike VB and Rocket Roy do their distance rowing at 9.5 SPI, their 2K SPI.
I am doing my distance rowing at 11, perhaps even 11.5 SPI, my 2K SPI.
The problem with Mike and Roy, then, is not their endurance and efficiency, but their stroking power.
If they did more quality foundational rowing, as I have done over the last five years, they would have a higher 2K stroking power and could do their distance rowing at higher rates and paces on the 10 MPS ladder.
Right now, they are at 1:51 @ 27 spm (9.5 SPI).
They meed to move up to 1:48 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI).
1:42 @ 29 spm (11 SPI)
Or even 1:40 @ 30 spm (11.7 SPI).
Then they would be rowing well.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Do you want to try again?KevJGK wrote:Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
Sure.KevJGK wrote:Do you want to try again?KevJGK wrote:Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
If you do this, your competitive status as a rower, your 2K time, comes down to one thing:
What is your 2K SPI?
For instance, Mike VB and Rocket Roy do their distance rowing at 9.5 SPI, their 2K SPI.
I am doing my distance rowing at 11, perhaps even 11.5 SPI, my 2K SPI.
The problem with Mike and Roy, then, is not their endurance and efficiency, but their stroking power.
If they did more quality foundational rowing, as I have done over the last five years, they would have a higher 2K stroking power and could do their distance rowing at higher rates and paces on the 10 MPS ladder.
Right now, they are at 1:51 @ 27 spm (9.5 SPI).
They meed to move up to 1:48 @ 28 spm (10.2 SPI).
1:42 @ 29 spm (11 SPI)
Or even 1:40 @ 30 spm (11.7 SPI).
Then they would be rowing well.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
Don't you want to be like Mike?KevJGK wrote:Do you want to try again?KevJGK wrote:Am I getting this right? You think you should do distance rowing at the same power as your best 2K, and do it all at 10MPS?ranger wrote:BTW, PaulS's advice to row at 10MPS in your distance training, I think, is excellent.
The only stricture that needs to be added is that you should also do this rowing in and around your 2K stroking power.
This is what _he_ does.
He is our 1x 55s OTW US National Champ--for both heavyweights and lightweights.
Not bad for someone who does silly things like doing their distance rowing on the erg at 10 MPS and their 2K SPI.
ranger
Last edited by ranger on November 29th, 2009, 12:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)
-
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 93
- Joined: November 3rd, 2009, 5:50 am
- Location: Butte, MT
-
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 93
- Joined: November 3rd, 2009, 5:50 am
- Location: Butte, MT
- Rocket Roy
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 338
- Joined: October 16th, 2006, 3:59 pm
- Location: London
Kev,KevJGK wrote:What about now?
What sort of 2K time could you pull now if you absolutely had to?
Certainly not sub 6.38.1 that is for sure.....
Lwt 55+ World Record Holder 6.38.1 (2006-2018)
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
World champion 2007, 2009, 2014.
2k pb...6.34.7
cycling
25 miles...55;24
10 miles...21.03
Golf best gross 78, 8 over par.
Kev--ranger wrote:People like Stepansen and Eskild E. do their distance rowing, 1:40 @ 30 spm (11.7 SPI), right at their 2K SPI.
That's ideal!
ranger
Things like distance rowing at 10 MPS and your 2K stroking power are ideals.
Do whatever lousy thing you want to do to get to the finish line in a 2K.
Pull the handle with your teeth if you want.
Don't train at all.
There is certainly no absolute need for ideals.
In fact, most of those in and around this forum seem to feel that any mention of ideals is outrageous, insulting, humiliating, lying, etc.
To each his own, I guess.
Personally, I can't get anything done without ideals.
And they don't make me feel bad at all.
I admire them.
So they inspire me.
They're amazing.
So they give me something significant to reach for.
ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)