Height/Weight Differences for Doubles

No, ergs don't yet float, but some of us do, and here's where you get to discuss that other form of rowing.
Post Reply
User avatar
ckaiserca
1k Poster
Posts: 144
Joined: June 21st, 2007, 1:04 pm
Location: Aurora, ON CANADA
Contact:

Height/Weight Differences for Doubles

Post by ckaiserca » May 14th, 2008, 8:50 pm

Howdy,

I'm 6'2" tall and weigh in around 230-35. My wife is 4'10.5" tall and is about 130. Something tells me that this will never work for a double.

Maybe in a touring scull? I don't know anything about real OTW, so please no laughing.
Started with my Model D on June 11, 2007
M 46 6'2" (1.87m) 233lbs (105.9kg)
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1184862882.png[/img]

Rowing for Eight Million!

psucrewcronin
Paddler
Posts: 15
Joined: December 24th, 2007, 11:59 pm
Location: State College, PA
Contact:

Post by psucrewcronin » May 14th, 2008, 10:22 pm

Hey ckaiserca,

I can't say I've done any sculling, but the experience I've had with height differences in fours and eights is that I find it extremely hard to keep with a stroke who is much taller than me. I know traditionally the bowman is the lightest, but I recommend having your wife stroke because it will be easier for you to keep up with her because you can drive faster. I have found when a taller person strokes I usually finish my drive earlier and have to make up for it with a slower recovery. Since you are presumably much much stronger, I think you can compensate for her shorter drive with your faster drive.

Take my advice with a grain of salt, because I only sweep.

Hope I helped.
J'aime l'aviron!
Penn State Crew
5' 11' 163lbs
Predominantly Port
2K 6:57
6K 22:33
10K 40:17

User avatar
PaulS
10k Poster
Posts: 1212
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Height/Weight Differences for Doubles

Post by PaulS » May 15th, 2008, 11:55 am

ckaiserca wrote:Howdy,

I'm 6'2" tall and weigh in around 230-35. My wife is 4'10.5" tall and is about 130. Something tells me that this will never work for a double.

Maybe in a touring scull? I don't know anything about real OTW, so please no laughing.
Don't expect Olympic Performance, but there is no reason to not row together if you want to. My recommendation would be to get her a set of oars with dimensions that will allow for her size. The nice part for her is that "regular" club rigging span will be "wide" in her case, and that is a nice thing. IOW, you both will need to be made comfortable and you are "normal rowing dimensions", she is not.

I'm your size, and my wife and I row togehter, however she is 5'7", so not quite so drastic a difference as what you deal with, I've learned a lot about scaling the rig because of this. I'm still a bit longer in the water, but we are comfortable. We have our own boat, which is the most comfortable, but we change the oars when using club boats and they work out fine.

We often hear comments from other rowers that are married, like "I can't believe you guys can row together", but as far as I'm concerned it's the most enjoyable rowing that I do. They must have something else in mind.

Oh, you go ahead and be the stroke, that way your wife gets to give the commands while rowing, and they seem to take quite naturally to that. :wink:
Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."

User avatar
michelle
500m Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: January 2nd, 2008, 2:43 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Post by michelle » May 15th, 2008, 1:26 pm

I agree with Paul... get your oars set up properly and put her in bow. She can just take her time through the water to match you.
Right now I'm coaching a masters quad that has two 5'7ish women, one 6'1 man and a 5'0 woman. I put one of the 5'7s in stroke because she has the best rhythm, then the guy, then the other 5'7 then the little lady in bow. They're totally pulling it off fine (now that we've set up the oars). And having less weight in the bow keeps you from plowing.
But I think the main thing is that if you like who you're rowing with you'll have a good time!

User avatar
ckaiserca
1k Poster
Posts: 144
Joined: June 21st, 2007, 1:04 pm
Location: Aurora, ON CANADA
Contact:

Post by ckaiserca » May 15th, 2008, 2:01 pm

Thanks for the input! It sounds like this could work then. . .

Now I just need to convince the wife :?
Started with my Model D on June 11, 2007
M 46 6'2" (1.87m) 233lbs (105.9kg)
[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1184862882.png[/img]

Rowing for Eight Million!

Snail Space
2k Poster
Posts: 258
Joined: September 10th, 2006, 12:13 pm
Location: Durham, UK

Re: Height/Weight Differences for Doubles

Post by Snail Space » May 15th, 2008, 4:57 pm

PaulS wrote:We often hear comments from other rowers that are married, like "I can't believe you guys can row together", but as far as I'm concerned it's the most enjoyable rowing that I do. They must have something else in mind.
They must be using the alternative pronunciation of "row".
:wink:

Cheers
Dave

User avatar
PaulS
10k Poster
Posts: 1212
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Height/Weight Differences for Doubles

Post by PaulS » May 15th, 2008, 5:54 pm

Snail Space wrote:
PaulS wrote:We often hear comments from other rowers that are married, like "I can't believe you guys can row together", but as far as I'm concerned it's the most enjoyable rowing that I do. They must have something else in mind.
They must be using the alternative pronunciation of "row".
:wink:

Cheers
Dave
Oh yes, good point. That happens from time to time, but is generally minor. And "Post practice debriefing" has a whole nuther meaning.... :D
Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."

Post Reply